U.S. Empire of Chaos Loses its Footing and Attempts to Topple Democratically Elected Philippine President Rodrigo Roa Duterte: Part One

Ferdinand Magellan Trip Around The World

On the 16^th of March 1521, Spaniard explorer Ferdinand Magellan, sailing from Spain, reached the archipelago of what was to become the Philippines. With the colonization that followed, the Philippines became part of the Spanish Empire, ending in 1898 when the U.S. Deep State targeted Cuba’s local gold (sugar) thanks to the 15th February 1898 dubious explosion of the U.S.S. Maine battleship in the harbor of Havana. This terrorist act did trigger the Spanish-American war and the beginning of the American Colonial Era of the Philippines. The Spanish-American war was followed by the 1899—1992 Philippine—American War and the Commonwealth period that was designed as a transitional administration in preparation for the country’s full achievement of independence.

Rodrigo Roa Duterte: Philippines 16th President

Rodrigo Roa Duterte, born in 1945 in Maasin, Southern Leyte, a law graduate, with a seven times Davos City’s Mayor proven track record, became the 16th President of the Philippines. Rodrigo Roa Duterte presents a potential threat to the Washington neocon leaders as he turned towards China and Russia and waved a French farewell “au revoir” to the Washington neocon thugs. The U.S. Empire of Chaos does not take this sort of loyalty shift lightly and many of us know what the Washington entourage is capable of when countries stop toeing the Washington neoconservative fascist line.

China President Xi Jinping with Philippine President Dutarte during official in China (October 2016)

During an October 2017 visit to Beijing China, Philippine President Rodrigo Roa Duterte, accompanied by 250 Philippine business leaders, made some remarkable comments that paved the way to what he called “a new commercial alliance as relations with longtime ally Washington deteriorate . . .In this venue, your honors, in this venue, I announce my separation from the United States.” Duterte told Chinese and Philippine business people, to applause, at a forum in the Great Hall of the People attended by Chinese Vice Premier Zhang. “Both in military, not maybe social, but economics also, America has lost.” Furthermore, President Dutarte added “For as long as I am here, do not treat us like a doormat because you’ll be sorry.” He added. “I will not speak with you. I can always go to China.”

Exercises in the disputed South China Sea have been put on hold, and 107 US troops operating drones surveilling Muslim militants will also have to leave the country soon, the Philippines Defense chief said. President Rodrigo Duterte said he wants an ongoing US-Philippine amphibious beach landing drill to be the last in his six-year presidency, with plans to halt all the 28 military exercises carried out with US forces every year.“This year would be the last,” Duterte pledged on Friday in Davao in the southern Philippines, AP reported. Dutarte also made some crude comments towards (former US. President) Barack Obama: the outspoken Philippines leader said his US counterpart Barack Obama, whom he has previously publicly called a “son-of-a-b***h,” should “go to hell.” Experts say the Philippines president’s plans to limit the presence of US troops will thwart Washington’s intention to beef up US forces in Southeast Asia in order to counter China. “President Duterte’s shoot-from-the-hip style of parochial democracy is deeply troubling,” Carl Thayer, an expert on the South China Sea, told AP. “If Duterte moves to curtail US rotational military presence from bases in the Philippines, this would undermine the US ability to deter China not only in defense of Philippines sovereignty, but regional security as well.”

Meanwhile the warmongering U.S. Empire of Chaos is remodeling Guantánamo Bay (Cuba) facilities and planning to invest a mere USD 500 million in new construction, from which USD 250 million for the hospital facilities: five additional beds: USD 50 million per bed.” Not bad for a Zimbabwe money printing style nation with twenty trillion USD debt!

Things are not doing well for the Anglo-American elite, The Bretton Woods Reserve Currency USD is losing its grip on an international community beginning to create and establish alternative competing financial products and institutions:

• BRICS: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa as an alternative to the Bretton Woods Western nations’ USD, GBP, EUR and ¥EN
• SCO: Shanghai Cooperation Organizationas as alternative to NATO
• AIIB: Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank as alternative to the IMF
• CIPS: Chinese inter-banking payment system as alternative to SWIFT
• Shanghai Gold Exchange as alternative to the fraudulent financial paper markets of London and New York
• CFFEX: China’s New China Financial Future Exchange

The AIIB or Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank is a major development in the international world of finances and a direct threat to US Dollar based institutions such as the Federal Reserve (FED), the IMF (International Monetary Fund), the World Bank, the Bank of England (BoE), the European Central Bank (ECB), the Bank of Japan (BoJ), and last but not least the Bank of International Settlements in Basel (BIS.)

Many of us may not have heard of the AIIB, but let’s not kid ourselves, The AIIB is a major financial threat to the 1944 Bretton Woods International Reserve Currency agreements. No less than 57 countries contributed to the start of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank; among others: The Philippines, France, Germany, Switzerland, Britain, South Korea, Canada, Belgium, Hungary, Ireland and Hong Kong.

But let’s get back to the Philippines, three archipelagos became of strategic importance for the geopolitical control of the U.S. Empire: the Philippines, Taiwan and Japan. As a footnote let’s not forget that following World War II, Japan and Germany remained to this very day two U.S. vassal states and US-occupied territories…

To be followed….

Bruno P. Gebarski for Geopoliticalnews.wordpress.com

 

 

 

The United States of America’s Democratic Values: An Empire’s Charade of Duplicity, Criminality and Lawlessness

American terrorist hooliganism is constantly mascaraed as Washington’s “spread of democracy” and the “defending of Western Values” thanks to the main stream media apparatchik well in control of the neocon-mana fed daily to a gullible nations of jaded westerners more interested in the Game of Throne or the latest Kim Kardashian gossip than the nefarious deeds their governments are up to. This alleged Western “spread of democracy” leitmotiv could not be further from the truth.

When revisiting the establishment of the Den Hague International Criminal Court of Justice in the Netherlands, honorable mentions (and kudos) ought to go to the nations that voted in favor of the establishment of this international rule of law. The International Criminal Court of Justice’s aim was and remains the putting away of international criminality whereby illustrious names such as Rockefeller, Rothschild, J. P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs, the Federal Reserve, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank of England (BoE) established in 1694, The European Central Bank, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) and the Khazarian mafia should have been put away a very long time ago, would justice reign in the land.

As prophet Isaiah, under God’s inspiration, once wrote: “The way of peace they know not; and there is no judgment in their goings: they have made them crooked paths: whosoever goeth therein shall not know peace.” —Isaiah 59.8 (KJV – King James Version of the Bible)

Needless to say, the international take down of recent war criminals such as Dick Cheney, both Bush and Clinton dynasties, also known as international drug lords for those better informed, Nicolas Sarkozy (former French President), Anthony Charles Lynton Blair (Former British Prime Minister) and of course Barack Obama, should have been put away a long time ago. Enumerating the name of the conflicts those nefarious leaders are responsible for would take too much space and is not the object of this post; nonetheless something Geopolitical News might revisit in future installments.    

If you think Geopolitical News is exaggerating when putting names like Obama or the Bush dynasty on this war criminals’ list: may we, please, invite you to review both Noam Chomsky’s quote about the corruption of all Post World War II U.S. presidencies:

or Ramsey Clark’s statement on U.S. Foreign Policy:

In 1998, the International Criminal Court was founded by the United Nations. The International Criminal Court (ICC or ICCt) is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal that sits in The Hague in the Netherlands. The ICC has the jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for the international crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. One would think the ICC would be an institution the Western World, including Britain and the United States of America in particular, would support and promote right?

170 nations were present in Rom on the 17 of July 1998 for the establishment of the International Criminal Court; great undertaking right? Well, among the 170 nations represented, 120 voted for the ICC’s establishment/foundation; 20 abstained and seven nations voted against it:

Bruno Gebarski

The Empire of Chaos strikes again: Declaration of U.S. sanctions thus war against Russia, Germany and Austria?

Amidst geopolitical cacophony, U.S. President Donald J. Trump and Владимир Путин (Vladimir Putin) will meet for the first time in Hamburg, Germany, against the backdrop of the well-known narrative of an alleged Russian collusion and meddling into the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.  What some astute observers describe here as the ongoing Neocon (Neo-Conservative) Washington fascist refrain. But naturally, the nefariousness of the Washington Régime and its countless destruction of lives and countries is “a given” and a “legitimate act of grandeur” as the U.S upholds its “Liberty and Freedom” Leitmotiv, shoving it down the throat of our international community with tanks, missiles, weaponry and wars if necessary.

As the US/EU fascist cavalry, within the cover-up of NATO, expands East, the amount of attempted color revolutions, coup d’états and deaths rise to a level never mentioned in the Mainstream Media (CNN, BBC, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Le Monde, Süd Deutsche Zeitung, the Washington Post and the New York Times) fake news narrative.  Babylon is ready to defend its Bretton Woods Reserve Currency Status (USD/EUR/GBP/YEN, and Chinese Renminbi since 2015) with wars if necessary and it has become necessary Ladies and Gentlemen!

Swiss historian Daniele Ganser in his brilliant work (unfortunately only in German): Die Illegale Kriege der NATO / The Illegal Wars of NATO, coins post-WWII U.S bête noire hegemon as an “Empire” being responsible for the death of at least 300 million lives since the end of World War II.

But this time, the (U.S.) Empire of Chaos is isolating itself again, wanting now to supply LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) and replace our Russian gas delivery and the upcoming €9.2 billion Nord Stream 2 pipeline project under the Baltic Sea that will double Russian gas delivery to Europe. Washington is trying to coerce Germany, Austria, France and Britain into buying U.S. energy: This time it won’t wash, Chancellor Merkel, French President Emmanuel Macron and Co. showed the Washington Empire of Chaos the finger sign threatening the U.S. with retaliations and sanctions. And by the way Сергей Викторович Лавров (Sergej Viktorovitch Lavrov), who was in Paris just one day before G20 Hamburg, confirmed that France & Germany will resume normal trade partnership with Russia thus by-passing the Washington fascist demands.

Further Reading: Washington and Berlin on a collision course via Counterpunch.org

Bruno Gebarski

 

Post-Mortem Western Mainstream Media Propaganda vis à vis U.S. Presidential Election

Quotes:

• “If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged. By violation of the Nuremberg laws I mean the same kind of crimes for which people were hanged in Nuremberg.” —Noam Chomsky

• “In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”  —Quote often attributed to George Orwell author of the renowned novel:  Nineteen Eighty-four

• What is history? The lie that everyone agrees on…” —Voltaire

President Elect Of the United States, PEOTUS, Donald Trump’s 2016 victory has left the Western Mainstream Media (MSM) speechless but yet struggling to salvage some scrap of what is left of its credibility or lack of it. Rigged news is spewed constantly by Western neocon controlled-media-outlets uttering an endless array of war-mongering propaganda against PEOTUS, Russia and China. This neocon propaganda is topped up by a never ending cultural Marxist Leitmotiv.

In his essay What is Cultural Marxism, William S. Lind writes: “Cultural Marxism is a branch of western Marxism, different from the Marxism-Leninism of the old Soviet Union. It is commonly known as ‘multiculturalism’ or, less formally, Political Correctness. From its beginning, the promoters of cultural Marxism have known they could be more effective if they concealed the Marxist nature of their work, hence the use of terms such as ‘multiculturalism.‘” Cultural Marxism upholds, among other things, sexual lawlessness and the destruction of the traditional Judeo-Christian family structure: the foundation of any stable and functioning society.

Both Democrats and Republicans parties are backed up by an oligopoly that controls its failing Main Stream Media (MSM) western propaganda with a succession of U.S.-NATO war-mongering geopolitical plots following each other at a breathtaking speed:

—Failed attempt to democratic candidate Hilary Rodham Clinton vote recount, which MSM rapidly brushed aside since more votes were “recovered” for PEOTUS than Hillary Clinton.

—Fake News narrative followed the failed attempt to the Democratic US vote-recount scheme.

—Shortly after the Fake News narrative, the MSM oligopoly came up with the “Russia-rigged-the-elections-results” stunt in an attempt to oppose the alternative media with outlets such as former United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy Dr. Paul Craig Robert’s blog. As if mainstream media did own the credibility for delivering facts and neutral information to its sheeple: Yeah right!

Most U.S., British and French citizens, under the spell of Western democratic delusion, underestimate how crucial it is for the establishment to control the news thus their minds. Maintaining the right level of MSM propaganda upholds the sheeple’s support for U.S.-NATO inception of uprisings, coup d’états and wars : Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Ukraine being just a few of the most recent US-examples. Remember the 1915 U.S./British sinking of the Lusitania cover-up plot that eventually brought the U.S. into WWI? Assistant Editor to the Financial Times Dr. Gillian Tett reminds us of the importance of controlling the masses’ opinion: “Most societies have an élite; an élite [who] tries to stay in power, and the way they stay in power is not merely by controlling the means of production, to be Marxist: i.e. controlling the money, but by controlling the cognitive map, the way we think. And what really matters in that respect is not so much what is actually said in public, but what is left undebated, unsaid.”

—The ongoing U.S and Western neocon war-mongering against Russia and China could have reached the next level with the assassination of the Russian Ambassador Andrey Karlov who was shot dead as he was delivering a speech at the opening of an exhibition called “Russia in the Eyes of Turks” at an art gallery in Ankara. Russian Senator Frants Klintsevich suggested that “the cold-blooded killing of Andrei Karlov, who died after being shot five times in the back, was a ‘planned action'”. He continued: “Everyone knew that he was going to attend this photo exhibition. It can be ISIS, or the Kurdish army which tries to hurt Erdogan. But maybe – and it is highly likely – that representatives of foreign NATO secret services are behind it.”

—Finally, a Russian military plane carrying 92 people, including dozens of Red Army Choir singers, dancers and orchestra members, crashed into the Black Sea shortly after takeoff from Sochi on its way to Latakia, Syria, on Sunday, killing everyone on board, Russian authorities said.

As author Fred Branfman wrote in his remarkable book Voices from the Plain of Jars, “One of the most shattering revelations about the [Laos] bombing was discovering why it had so vastly increased in 1969, as described by the refugees. I learned that after President Lyndon Johnson had declared a bombing halt over North Vietnam in November 1968, he had simply diverted the planes into northern Laos. There was no military reason for doing so. It was simply because, as U.S. Deputy Chief of Mission Monteagle Stearns testified to the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in October 1969, ‘Well, we had all those planes sitting around and couldn’t just let them stay there with nothing to do.'”

One of the worst pieces of neocon U.S. propaganda to be published on the East Coast, besides the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, is The Washington Post and its daily disgorge of war-mongering titles such as “Intelligence community investigating covert Russian influence operations in the United States.” According this Washington Post article, “U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies are investigating what they see as a broad covert Russian operation in the United States to sow public distrust in the upcoming presidential election and in U.S. political institutions, intelligence and congressional officials said. The aim is to understand the scope and intent of the Russian campaign, which incorporates cyber-tools to hack systems used in the political process, enhancing Russia’s ability to spread disinformation.”

Well, is not this what one of the worst Washington neocon representatives, Hillary Rodham Clinton, gushes on a regular basis: “. . . And we will make sure the Iranians and the world understand that the United States will act decisively if necessary, including taking military action. There will have to be consequences for any violation by Iran and that, the nuclear option should not at all be taken off the table: that has been my position consistently . . . And Russia has to support the international community’s effort sincerely or be held to account . . . That Russia or China will pay a price, because they are holding up ‘progress’ blockading it that is no longer tolerable.” —Hillary Rodham Clinton

In a very insightful article, The New York Times’ Media Bias, author Noam Chomsky perfectly refers to the U.S. empire hegemonic aspiration: “The [U.S] media reflects, uncritically, the approved doctrine: that the U.S. owns the world, and it does so by right.”

Bruno Pierre Gebarski

• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part One)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part Two)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | September 11th 2001 and the Rise of U.S. Neocons (Part Three)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Preemptive Strike & Neocons Mainstream Media Propaganda (Part Four)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchy and Neocons Destructive Agenda (Part Five)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchy and Neocons Destructive Agenda (Part Six: coming soon)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | U.S.-NATO Serbian Genocide (Part Seven: planned)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Iraq the War for Oil and Control of the Middle East (Part Eight: planned)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Iraq the War for OIL and Control of the Middle East (Part Nine: planned)

U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchs and Neocons’ Feudalistic Power Grab (Part Six)

“There is a special breed of international financiers whose success typically is built upon certain character traits. Those include cold objectivity, immunity to patriotism, and indifference to the human condition. That profile is the basis for proposing a theoretical strategy, called the Rothschild Formula, which motivates such men to propel governments into war for the profits they yield… As long as the mechanism of central banking exists, it will be to such men an irresistible temptation to convert debt into perpetual war and war into perpetual debt.”        

  —G. Edward Griffin | Author of “The Creature from Jekyll Island“

“People, governments and economies of all nations must serve the needs of multinational banks and corporations.” 

—Zbigniew Brzezinski | Author of “The Grand Chessboard”

Geopoliticalnews suggests a review of Part One, Part Two, Part Three of our series on “U.S. exceptionalism and its global terror management.” This alleged 21^st century U.S. exceptionalism, Part Four and Part Five, doctrine is perfectly sustained by a the resurgence of virulent brand of neocon propaganda spewed by major U.S. newspapers with its goons and stooges: Part Four and Part Five.

We saw how this swaggering super-arrogant superpower, cowboys-on-steroids, imperialist U.S.A. continues to spread its “gospel of democracy”, mostly with coup d’états and wars (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Ukraine, to name just a few) and defend its fiat currency: USD, EUR, GBP and YEN system against the rising alternative offered by the BRICS, China’s SCO, AIIB, the new Shanghai Gold Exchange, the Financial Future Exchange (CFFEX), the CIPS, and the (Chinese) Renminbi, which entered the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on October 1^st of 2016. We reviewed the neocon financial tools: Quantitative Easing (QE) “to infinity” and derivative products such as Credit Default Swaps (CDS) as a way of kicking the financial can down the road and saw how ECB, FED, BOE and BOJ Central Banks destroy capital for the sake of bailing out the too-big-to-jail financial institutions.

As Dr. Stephen J. Sniegoski writes in: Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel: “It was only the traumatic effects of the 9/11 terrorism that enabled the agenda of the neocons to become the policy of the United States of America.”

Where is the judicial foundation of all those U.S.-wars and coup d’états? Was the U.S., Britain or France threatened by Libya? What’s the heck were France (with its French President neocon Sarkozy) and Britain doing bombing Libya? Why were France and Britain meddling in Africa’s richest country and attacking its sovereignty instead of minding their own business and rebuilding their crumbling road-infrastructure or reducing their astronomic public debts, both in excess of two billion Euro?

What is Germany doing bombing Syria with the US-Allies and supporting the Empire of Chaos’ neocon imperialistic agenda instead of protecting the sovereignty of its own German territory? Where is the balance between the executive, legislative and judicial branches with its system of checks and balances? How could Angela Merkel have overstepped the judicial raison d’être of the German constitution to open Germany’s borders on September the 4^th of 2015? Did Merkel consult with her government? Did Merkel democratically ask the German People?

How about the 9/11 hijacking of the U.S. Democracy? Shouldn’t have the legislative branch of the U.S government, represented by Congress, the House of Representatives and the Senate, been active? How come the U.S. Congress did not impeach the Bushes, Clinton’s and alleged Kenyan Squatter in Chief himself for drug trafficking and/or war crimes? Could not these be the signs of a resurging “democratic totalitarianism” just about to transform itself into outright fascism? Are we becoming a dystopian society?  Remember Henry Gouroux’s observation on oligarchy aka plutocracy and kleptocracy? 

The western world has being taken captive by oligarchs, plutocrats and kleptocrats represented by key cartel groups ruling the world of finances and business: We could call them the profiteering beneficiaries who can be easily classified in seven different industrial cartels: Finance, Media, Energy, Military, Pharmacy, Chemy and food:

1. Finance cartel

• World Bank | USA
  
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) | USA
• The Institute for the Works of Religion | Vatican Bank | Italy
  
• Bank of International  Settlements (BIS) | Switzerland
  
• Private Federal Reserve Bank (FED) | USA
  
• Bank of England (BOE) | Britain
  
• European Central Bank (ECB) | Germany
  
• Bank of Japan (BOJ) | Japan
  
• JP Morgan Chase & Co. | USA
  
• Goldman Sachs | USA
  
• Citigroup Inc | USA
  
• Wells Fargo & Co. | USA
  
• Bank of America | USA
  
• BNP Paribas | France
  
• Deutsche Bank | Germany
  

2. Media cartel

• Google | USA | USD 74.64 billion
• Walt Disney | USA | USD 52.46 billion
• Comcast | USA | USD 75.51 billion
• 21^st Century Fox | USA | USD 28.99 billion
• Facebook | USA | USD 17.93 billion
• Bertelsmann | Germany | USD 17.14 billion
• Viacom | USA | USD 13.27 billion
• CBS | USA | USD 13.89 billion
• Baidu | China | USD 66.4 billion
• News Corp | USA | USD 33.7 billion

3. Energy cartel: “Seven Sisters” which became the Super Majors

• BP British Petroleum | United Kingdom (merged with Amoco in 1998)
• Eni SpA | Italy
• Total SA  | France
• Chevron | USA (merged with Texaco in 2000)
• ExxonMobil | USA (merged with Mobile in 1999)
• Royal Dutch Shell | Netherlands

4. Military cartel:

• Lockheed Martin | USA
• Boeing | USA
• BAE Systems | UK
• Raytheon | USA
• General Dynamics | USA
• Northrop Grumman | USA
• Airbus Group | FRA & GER | EU

5. Pharmacy cartel

• Johnson & Johnson | USA | ÚSD 70.07 billion
• Novartix | Switzerland | USD 49.4 billion
• Roche | Switzerland| CHF 48.14 billion
• Pfizer | USA | USD 48.85 billion
• Sanofi | France | EUR 37.05 billion
• Merck Group | Germany | EUR 11.36 billion
• Glaxo Smith Kline; GSK | Britain | GBP 23.92 billion  

6. Chemy cartel

• BASF | Germany | USD 78.70 billion
• Dow Chemical | USA | USD 58.2 billion
• Sinopec | China | USD 58 billion
• SABIC | Saudi Arabia | USD 43.3 billion
• Exxon Mobil | USA | USD 38.2 billion
• Formosa Plastics | Taiwan | USD 37.1 billion
• Lyondell Basell Industries | USA | USD 34.8 billion
• DuPont| USA | USD 29.9 billion
• Ineos | Switzerland | USD 54 billion
• Bayer | Germany | USD 28.1 billion

7. Food cartel

• Nestlé | Switzerland | CHF 88.8 billion
• Pepsi Co. | USA | USD 63.06 billion
• Unilever | Britain and Netherlands | EUR 53.27 billion
• Coca Cola | USA | USD 44.29 billion
• Mars | USA | USD 33 billion
• Mondelēz | USA | USD 29.6 billion
• Danone | France | EUR 22.41 billion
• General Mills | USA | USD 16.6 billion
• Kellogg’s | USA| USD 14.8 billion
• Associated British Foods | Britain | GBP 12.8 billion

Bruno Gebarski

France, Britain, Israel and U.S. deep rooted hatred towards Germany | Earnest Albert Hooton | Theodore N. Kaufman | Louis Nizer

An alliance between Russia and Germany has always made sense: German engineering, excellence of manufacturing to the minutest detail, German craftsmanship respectfully acknowledged by the French as the result of “la rigueur allemande”: German precision and exactness. But let’s look at the Larousse definition of the French word rigueur:

• Trait of a person, or something that distinguishes himself/itself with exactitude, logic and perfect precision
• Behaving with severity and inflexibility
• Excessive as of a rule, obligation or action
• Character, discipline, staying the course, uncompromising: my personal understanding of the French word rigueur in connection to Germany
  

I’d like to suggest: German precision with disciplined exactitude as an English translation for the French expression: la rigueur allemande.

The first three definitions came from the French Larousse dictionary (a French institution similar to l’Académie Française (French Academy). I don’t quite agree with excessive; however, severity and inflexibility are a possible negative side of “rigueur” as often perceived by the much more lenient and flexible French, who often are ready to compromise “to get a job done.” The word rigueur has also an intrinsic/built-in meaning of character, discipline, staying the course and not compromising; as opposed to the renowned French “system D” we seem to be so good at!

The French “system D” is probably the opposite of “la rigueur allemande!” The letter “D” being a charming French euphemism for the verb “se démerder” (French slang) which literally means “de-shitting oneself” or “getting oneself out of a shitty situation one might have been suddenly confronted with! Possessing both cultures and more than 28 years of German residency (while pretending to be fluent in German), I perceive the French expression “la rigueur allemande” as a French (and international) acknowledgement of the high level of German industrial and technological workmanship.

The French army may not necessarily be an institution the international observer would perceive as having “German precision and disciplined exactitude!” There is a German joke about French tanks: “When do French tanks get to see the front line? With their rear view mirrors.” As a matter of fact the (unofficial) French Resistance (Résistance française) did more damage to the invading Nazis than the official French army. As a German neighbor told me once: “Do you know why France has trees along its roads? . . . “So we Germans can march in the shade.” There is a plethora of French army jokes such as:

• How many Frenchmen does it take to defend Paris? Nobody knows, it’s never been tried.
• Why don’t they have fireworks at Euro Disney? Because every time they shoot them off, the French try to surrender.
• How many gears does a French tank have? Four reverse and one forward, in case the enemy attacks from the rear: my all time favorite.
• What do you call 100,000 Frenchmen with their hands up? The Army.

“The French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror alert level from ‘Run’ to ‘Hide.’ The only two higher levels in France are ‘Collaborate’ and ‘Surrender.’ The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France’s white flag factory, effectively paralyzing the country’s military capability.” from Alert To Threats in Europe by John Cleese

When I was working as an Export Director for a mid size Bavarian (Franconian) company, not far from Nuremberg, I preferred the comfort of a French Citroën to the traditional Audi/Benz or BMW:  I once heard one of our managers telling someone: “Oh . . . Citroën . . . French cars . . . He [yours truly] should know . . . They already rust in the catalogue!…” Renault, Citroen or Peugeot don’t rust anymore (as they used to in the 70s) but never match(ed) the aura of a “Made in Germany” BMW, Audi or Mercedes Benz!

“Made in Germany” deserves a short visit. In the 1880s, Britain was Europe’s Industrial Revolution flagship. However, Britain was losing ground to Germany being inundated with “cheaper German goods,” similar to how we perceived “made in China” in the 80’s and 90’s. The 23rd of August 1887 marked the birth of “Made in Germany.” A British trademark law from the “merchandise Marks Act” imposed by Britain for all imported German products, which had to carry the label “Made in Germany.” Britain meant this trademark as a mean to downgrade German goods but it eventually turned out to be the exact opposite! German industrialists owe the origin of “Made in Germany” to Britain.

In all seriousness, there has been and still is an ongoing conspiracy against the German people, particularly prior to WWI and onward. Folks like Earnest Albert Hooton, Theodore N. Kaufman and Louis Nizer are three renowned Anglo Saxon “stars” who outwardly promoted and encouraged a German ethnic cleansing aka genocide.

Professor Earnest Albert Hooton (1887 — 1954) was a U.S. anthropologist and Professor at Harvard University.

In his article “Breed War Strain Out of Germans” in the New York daily newspaper P.M. from January 4, 1943, “Sir” Earnest Albert Hooton (also notorious for his anti-Semitic written rants) laid out an “out-breeding” plan that would “destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities.” Where did Hooton acquire such pathological and evil anti-German hatred: In the U.S.A. or while studying in Britain at Oxford University?

New York daily newspaper P.M. from January 4, 1943

“Our distinguished” Harvard University professor’s proposal was calling for “genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers [doesn’t this remind us of Germany’s 2015 migrant invasion?] and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies . . . The objects of this measure,” wrote Dr. Hooton, “include reduction of the birthrate of ‘pure’ Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by ‘out breeding’ and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.”

Theodore N. Kaufman (1911 — 1986) and his publication: “Germany Must Perish”

“Theodore N. Kaufman, the author of Germany Must Perish, was a Manhattan-born Jewish [Zionist] businessman who was also chairman of a group that called itself the ‘American Federation for Peace (sic).’ [The following lines will prove the veracity of Kaufman’s understanding of the word peace.] The first edition of Germany Must Perish was published in 1940 or early 1941. A second, 96-page edition, which sold for 25 cents, was published in 1941 by Argyle Press of Newark, New Jersey. Both editions were issued when the United States was still officially neutral, that is, before the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941. Theodore N. Kaufman’s fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman’s plan a ‘sensational idea.’”

Theodore N. Kaufmann: Chairman of the “American Federation for Peace”: “The most practical and expeditious manner in which the ultimate penalty must be levied upon the German nation. Quite naturally, massacre and wholesale execution must be ruled out [how gracious and civilized of you Sir Kaufmann!]. In addition to being impractical when applied to a population of some seventy million, such methods are inconsistent with the moral obligations and ethical practices of civilization. There remains then but one mode of ridding the world forces of Germanism — and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind. This modern method, known to science as Eugenic Sterilization, is at once practical, humane and thorough. Sterilization has become a byword of science, as the best means of ridding the human race of its misfits: the degenerate, the insane, the hereditary criminal.”

Louis Nizer (1902 — 1994): American trial lawyer and senior partner of the law firm Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon.

‘In 1945 some particularly clever American Jews published the occupation guidebook What to do with Germany 1945, distributed by special service forces, army services forces, U.S. army.  The directive was based on a book of the same title by Louis Nizer  [What To Do With Germany], which was published in 1944 and is posted on the Internet. Louis Nizer, a wealthy Jewish lawyer from New York with close ties to the White House, was a colleague of Theodore Kaufmann, (author of Germany Must Perish), and of Henry Morgenthau, FDR’s [Franklin Delano Roosevelt] Secretary of the Treasury and the author of the Morgenthau Plan [more about the Morgenthau Plan in a following blog article] . . . Louis Nizer argued that ‘instead of de-industrializing Germany and reducing its population through starvation and sterilization, the USA should benevolently ‘lobotomize the Germans culturally, educationally and psychologically.'”

Sir Louis Nizer went on to say: “The French were accustomed to saying, ‘we must destroy Germany or make peace with her and to destroy her is an absurdity.’ But as the French have since learned, it is not easy to make peace with her. Others, stirred to consuming hatred by German brutalities, suggest that they be destroyed as a race by eugenic sterilization. They argue that . . . sterilization of the German people might similarly be considered a protective measure to immunize the world forever against the virus of Germanism . . . Vasectomy, the operation on the male, simply requires a slight incision since the sperm duct lies just beneath the skin. The operation takes only ten minutes to perform and the patient may resume work immediately afterwards . . . There are about 25 million German men and women within the procreation ages, and it is estimated that twenty thousand surgeons performing about twenty-five operations daily could sterilize the entire male population of Germany within three months. At the normal death rate of two per cent per annum or one and a half million people yearly, the German people would practically disappear within two generations.”

In the following installment, we shall review the war crimes of (Western) leaders such as Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Additional  reading:

• Versailles (1919): German-humiliating peace treaty from Allies France, Britain & US | Versailles Two: 1945 | Versailles Three: 1993 | Versailles Four: 2015 (Part 12)
• Britain & U.S. Pre-WWI “Terror Management” | Winston Churchill | The Reichsbank, The Federal Reserve & The Lusitania Trap (Part 11)
• Britain & U.S. Pre-WWI “Terror Management” | The British and German Navies | The Lusitania Trap (Part 10)
• Western NATO and U.S.-led geopolitical duplicity (1949 — 2016) | MittelEuropa, Lebensraum and U.S.-Vassal State Germany (Link)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (part 9)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)
• Will the abrupt change of U.S. policy towards Syria prove the demise of NATO’s Western Alliance? (link)
• The Six-Step U.S. Strategy For Violent Regime Takeover (Link)

 

 

 

 

Britain & U.S. Pre-WWI “Terror Management” | Winston Churchill | The Reichsbank, The Federal Reserve & The Lusitania Trap (Part Two)

After having won the 1871 war against France, Germany transformed its 300 entities, duchies and city states into a more unified country. In 1876. Germany also started its own central bank, the Reichsbank issuing a Goldmark independently from the Rothschild and Rockefeller central banks criminals of London and Paris. This rapidly allowed Germany to grow enough financial and industrial wealth to become a major European geopolitical and geo-financial power thus threat to both France and Britain.

By 1900, Germany had become the largest steel producer in Europe (1913 steel production: Germany: 19,3 million tons. Britain: 10.4 million tons) with more railway tracks than Britain or France. In 1903, the Naval race between Britain and Germany led the British Navy to build the Lusitania: Coined the “Greyhound of the Seas”, the Lusitania was to become the fastest Atlantic Crossing and to compete with the German Hapag, which dated back to 1847, and Norddeutscher Lloyd (NDL) or North German Lloyd (NGL) formed in 1856.

The Lusitania made her first trip from Liverpool to New York in September 1907. Right before WWI the Lusitania had been transformed for war. Ammunition magazines and concealed gun mounts were fitted on her teak deck standing by for the addition of guns whenever it would be needed.

On May 1, 1915, the ship departed New York City bound for Liverpool. Unknown to her passengers but probably no secret to the Germans, almost all her hidden cargo consisted of munitions and contraband destined for the British war effort. As the fastest ship afloat, the luxurious liner felt secure in the belief she could easily outdistance any submarine. Nonetheless, the menace of submarine attack reduced her passenger list to only half her capacity.

“On May 7th, 1915, the Lusitania approached within 12 miles of the southern Irish coast. Winston Churchill, the Lord of the Admiralty, knew that German U-boats were operating in the area after three ships had been sunk in the previous 2 days. Not only did Churchill not come to the assistance of the Lusitania but he ordered her planned escort, the destroyer Juno, to return to Queenstown harbor. Earlier, the Lusitania had been ordered to reduce speed by shutting down one of her four boilers (ostensibly to save coal). She was a sitting duck and the entire Admiralty [Winston Churchill] knew it.”

“At 2:10 in the afternoon a torpedo fired by the German submarine U 20 slammed into her side. A mysterious second explosion ripped the liner apart. One thousand one hundred nineteen of the 1,924 aboard died. The dead included 114 Americans which enraged the American public opinion. The political fallout was immediate. President Wilson protested strongly to the Germans. Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan, a pacifist, resigned. However, the seeds of American animosity towards Germany were sown.” Within two years after Woodrow Wilson waited for his second term reelection before sending America to war in April 2017.

Central banking: the tri-polar pre-WWI financial tension: The Bank of England, the Reichbank and the Federal Reserve.

The propagandist idea behind the Federal Reserve was that the U.S. needed a “powerful banking” entity such as the Bank of England (BoE) as American financiers thought that New York needed to develop its own commercial trading system that could handle bills of exchange in the same way as the London market. The Federal Reserve was founded in 1913 in Jekyll Island and “legalized” by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson’s government not too long after.

The “Fed” is a private banking institution that has become a U.S and international financial tapeworm parasite as describe by Catherine Austin Fitts. It destroys markets, capital, middle class, societies and families thus, the very foundation of a healthy and thriving society! Since Post WWII Bretton Woods agreements, its parasite tentacles have expended globally and connected itself to the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank with even more looting organizations such as the IMF (International Monetary Fund). the World Bank and the BIS (Bank of International Settlements), all having one single basic currency packaged into four different “names”: USD, GBP, EUR & ‎¥EN. The CHF (Swiss Franc) should be added to the list since the BIS in Basel is very much part of this international banking cartel. It is very relevant to refer again to G. Edward Griffin’s monumental work on the Federal Reserve: “The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve.”

Paul Moritz Warburg (1868 – 1932) was one of the original founders of this “US financial private banking cartel” who drew up the institutional design of the Federal Reserve System. His older brother Max Moritz Warburg (1867 – 1946), a close adviser of Kaiser Wilhelm II. was the German Jewish banker who assisted Germany into financing its WWI expenses. Max Moritz Warburg and his younger brother Paul Moritz were both in favor of an American German financial version of the French-British “Entente Cordiale” in order to erode the British financial and industrial monopoly.

The creation of the German Reichsbank established in 1876. was seen by Britain as a financial threat likely to compete with the Bank of England. From 1873 to 1914 the German Empire introduced the German Goldmark.  At the beginning of WWI the Goldmark was turned into a “Papermark” to become one of the most disastrous financial crisis in German history! The Allies were shrewd enough to demand “Goldmark” payments for WWI compensation and not the fiat “Papermark” legal tender. The German Goldmark became a threat to the London and Washington central bankers: An additional reason why Germany had “to be destroyed.” It would be  worthwhile reading Peter Williamson Campbell‘s work: Britain Was Responsible For WWI, WWII & The Holocaust: Aided And Abetted By The USA And The Vatican to shed more light on the topic of western banking criminality.

The carving out of Germany following WWI by the allies was obvious!  France and Britain wanted to do away with a possible ”German threat” and blend Germany into a European context that should never allow the country, financially and economically, to ever stand up again. Much more was to follow after WWII and the 1992 Treaty of Maastricht coined by French Président François Mitterrand as: “A Versailles Without The War.“

Bruno P. Gebarski

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (Part Nine)

”Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” —Jorge Agustín Nicolás Ruiz de (George) Santayana, Spanish-born philosopher  (1863 — 1952)

“War is the continuation of politics by other means.” —Carl von Clausewitz, Prussian General (1780 — 1831)

Relying on Western Mainstream media is often connected to propaganda and geopolitical lies such as:

• 9/11 was an Al Qaeda “terror attack” on America (which in some way it was because Al Qaeda is a U.S. CIA asset in the first place!)
• Russia is alone to be blamed for the Ukrainian conflict
• Crimea “was invaded” by Vladimir Putin
• Libya was freed from Muammar al-Gaddafi for “democratic” reasons
• Egypt and its Arab Spring was the outburst of a “democratic” revolution

Many things are not what they appear to be and many historical events, we were taught at schools/universities or read about, rarely recount the truth of what happened!  Wars are (often) initiated by financial institutions and their bankster cabal!

Could this have been the case when, on June the 28^th of 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, were shot dead in Sarajevo (Serbia)? Shortly after their assassination, Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Britain, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Italy, Serbia, Russia, Turkey and the U.S. got involved in a cataclysmic chain of events that would make up for one of the bloodiest wars in European history.

How could a European conflict (and World War One) end up with Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles, often known as the War Guilt Clause, and Germany bearing alone the full moral responsibility for this (European) catastrophe?

“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.” (Treaty of Versailles, Article 231)

Australian historian and scholar Christopher Clark, author of “The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914“, makes an insightful statement: “Those who think that my book is about an acquittal of Germany’s great responsibility for the conflict are on the wrong path. This book does not set Germany free from its shared responsibility of the outbreak of this war whatsoever. It is an attempt at considering and understanding the origin of this war as a European problem. It is not striving to ‘de-Germanize’ the war but to ‘Europeanize’ it.”

“Wer meint in meinem Buch einen Freispruch für die deutsche Staatsführung damals zu erlesen ist auf dem falschen Weg. . . . Das Buch spricht die deutschen überhaupt nicht von einer starken und großen Mitverantwortung an den Ausbruch dieses Krieges frei, sondern versucht die Entstehung dieses Krieges als europäisches Problem zu verstehen und zu betrachten. Es ist ein Versuch die Geschichte dieses Krieges nicht zu ‘entdeutschen’ sondern zu europäisieren.” —Christopher Clark

Germany never initiated nor started this war in the first place: Austria-Hungary did! So, why were the Allies (France in particular) so keen at accusing and humiliating Germany when France, Britain, Russia, Serbia, Austria-Hungary and the U.S. should have also been held accountable? Why Germany?

To answer this question, we need to review the geopolitical circumstances that transformed Prussia from a fractured kingdom (post Napoleonic wars) to a united German nation. How was Germany able to accumulate so much wealth from 1850 to 1914? Germany’s industrial strength was nothing short of an “Industrial Miracle.” Despite the fact that this Industrial Revolution started 100 years later than in Britain, the Netherlands and Flemish (north) Belgium, by 1900, Germany had become Europe’s number one economy. How did it happen?

The quintessential reason for Germany’s industrial revival (1871-1900) was the establishment of a German Currency (Mark) backed by Gold! Germany’s national wealth was rapidly created because their gold backed currency was not borrowed from central banks. This is geopolitically and geofinancially crucial because both (private) Bank of England (BoE) and newly created (private) U.S. Federal Reserve (1913 in Jekyll Island) did not have “monetary control” over Germany. As a nation, Germany was free to issue interest free money. Just like Adolf Hitler did with Germany’s development of what would become the world’s finest Autobahn (highway) network, Germany’s “interest free” money speeded up the expansion of its industrial wealth.

Germany’s late nineteen century industrialization was also speeded up thanks to:

• The 1832 creation of a Zollverein (customs union) that promoted free trade between all German States
• The 1870 German defeat over France and Otto von Bismarck‘s 1871 creation of a united Germany (from its initial 25 German-speaking states, city-states and duchies) that  stimulated its industrialization even further
• The new politically united Germany could now exploit the rich iron-fields of Lorraine taken from France
• The development of a national railway network especially after 1830. By 1850 Germany had constructed half as much as Britain and twice as much as France
• The extraction of coal from the Silesian, Rhineland and Ruhr fields
• Germany becoming Europe’s leading steel-producing nation in the late 19th century
• The emergence of larger companies such as Alfred Krupp (railway, locomotives and armament production) and Werner Siemens

Incidentally, the 23^rd of August 1887 marked the birth of Made in Germany: A trademark law from the “Merchandise Marks Act” imposed by Britain on all German imported goods, which had to bear the “Made in Germany” label. Britain’s obvious intention was to downgrade German products as of “lesser quality” thus “lesser price,” which, as we know, turned out in Germany’s favo(u)r!

We are beginning to see how German currency (gold Mark) and German economy lead us again to the central banksters! London, New York and Paris did not like Germany issuing free money and feared (France especially) the threat that such an economic powerhouse could cause!  Winston Churchill, appointed First Lord of the Admiralty before the start of World War I, would eventually make this revealing tatement:

“You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism but against the economic strength of the German people, which must be smashed once and for all, regardless whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest“. —Winston Churchill

In part 10 of this series, we shall see how French Premier Minister Georges Clémenceau was instrumental into forging the disastrous Treaty of Versailles that would eventually “humiliate” and “flatten” Germany not only economically but also as a nation.

 Bruno P. Gebarski

Further reading:

• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (Part 9)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (Part 7)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)