Tag Archives: Twitter

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and US-led “Terror Management” | NATO’s Totalitarian Expansion | Neo-Conservatism | NGOs and Color Revolutions

EU_Gorbachev_EUSSIn the previous blog article, we reviewed how post WWI U.S. replaced the British Empire with the start of the private Federal Reserve and post WWII 1944 Bretton Woods agreements with the establishment of the U.S. Dollar as world currency; the 1971 de-pegging of the USD from gold, the 1973 Rockefeller’s crude oil quadrupled price heist also known as “Oil Crisis”, the 1989 Berlin wall events that reunited Germany and triggered the destruction of the Union of the Socialist States of Russia (USSR) and the promise the United States made to the Soviet Union (now Russia) not to use German Reunification as an opportunity for NATO‘s expansion.

Totalitarian Democracies | Neocolonialism | Color Revolutions

Why would the United States of America embarrass its Western European allies and break its promise? A few months later, on March the 12th of 1999, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland became full members of NATO. In 2004, on March the 29th, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia joined the ranks of NATO, and last but not least, Albania and Croatia in 2009!

Color Revolution is a neocolonialism form of 21st century warfare! I would like to suggest color revolutions as a  cyber- or net-centric digital warfare form of the old fashioned coup d’état. Why digital? Because the U.S. army, transnational crime organizations and NGOs, among others, use social media platforms such as Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, ask.fm, Tumblr in a highly sophisticated and coordinated manner (flashmobs) to disseminate their propaganda via social swarming:

“Tweeting the Arab Spring? That’s so 2010. A future tactic in cyber-based-information warfare is built upon mobile-media wielding e-citizen soldiers employing social swarming tactics to overwhelm a system, a decision maker, or a critical node. These mobile networks are vital to starting and maintaining cyber-based insurgency, drawing physical and moral strength from super-empowered individuals, while also using super-connected-individual networks to spread information, move undetected, and muster support, constantly one step ahead of authorities. It is possible for this swarm to move from the online world into the real world where violence may ensue.” (source: usacac.army) It is one of the many venues Western totalitarian democracies (such as the U.S. and its EU vassal state) use. Totalitarian democracy is a term that F. William Engdahl coined in his challenging book: “Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order.”
In the articleNeo-Cons for human rights” Tony Cartalucci makes a very insightful statement about Neo-Conservatism: “As counter-intuitive as it may sound, a great deal of Neo-Conservatives are deeply involved in human rights. One may wonder in what capacity, since this war mongering clique of big-business connected scoundrels is renowned for its role in the most unprecedented, flagrant, and grievous human rights violations in American history.”
The United States of America, NATO and the European Union use some of the following tools and tactics (alphabetically ordered)
  • Balkanisation of target countries and regions
  • Central Banking such as the Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of England (BoE) and Bank of Japan (BoJ)
  • Color Revolutions: Serbia/Kosovo, Georgia and Ukraine
  • Media propaganda via Western Press under U.S. CIA control
  • NATO as an international tool of neocolonialism expansion
  • Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
  • Social Media propaganda (Kosovo and Egypt) used by the military
  • Social Swarming military techniques (flachmobs, e-citizens)
  • War on Terror: a fictitious enemy that can be created any where any time with U.S. | Western | Saudi | Israeli army subsidiaries such as Al Qaeda, ISIS, IS, ISIL, Daesh or Blackwater: One of the many (170) private mercenaries firms employed by the U.S. during the war in Iraq.

to expand their geopolitical reach, sphere of “influence” and financial “thiefdom.” Just like the old communist iron curtain exemplified by the Berlin Wall, a similar “EU-Financial Wall” has been raised with the single European currency. As Prof. Dr. Politics_F_Friedrich.Hayek_ServitudeWilhelm Hankel used to say: Nineteen men of different heights and statures cannot expect a tailor to cut them one single suit to fit them all!” This is what the EUR is supposed to be; in the long term the EUR can only “survive” under the terms of financial fascism and slavery countries such as Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and France are already experiencing.

Colored revolutions always occur in a nation with strategic, natural resources: gas, oil, military bases and geopolitical interests. And they also take place in countries with socialist-leaning, anti-imperialist governments. The movements promoted by US agencies in those countries are generally anti-communist, anti-socialist, pro-capitalist and pro-imperialist.” writes international lawyer and consultant Eva Golinger In her article “Colored Revolutions, a New Form of Régime Change Made in the USA:”

“In 1983, the strategy of overthrowing inconvenient governments and calling it ‘democracy promotion’ was born. Through the creation of a private ‘foundations’ also known as Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs)” such as:

  • Canva: Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies
  • Albert Einstein Institution (AEI): Advancing freedom through non violent action”
  • Freedom House: 75 years championing democracy
  • International Center for Non-Violent Conflict (ICNC): “Nonviolent conflict is a way for people to fight for rights”
  • International Republican Institute (IRI): “Advancing Democracy Worldwide” (Board of directors: John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Brent Scowcroft)
  • National Democratic Institute (NDI): “Support and strengthen democratic institutions worldwide”
  • National Endowment for Democracy (NED): “Supporting freedom around the world freedom, justice, self-determination, and accountable government, through the use of civil resistance”
  • Project for the New American Century (PNAC)
  • USAID: “We partner to end extreme poverty and promote resilient, democratic societies while advancing our security and prosperity”


” . . . The Washington régime filters funding and strategic aid to political parties and groups abroad that promotes U.S. agenda in nations with insubordinate governments.” Golinger goes on to say: “Behind all these ‘foundations’ and ‘institutes’ is the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the financial branch of the Department of State. Today, USAID has become a critical part of the security, intelligence and defense axis in Washington. In 2009, the Inter-agency Counterinsurgency Initiative became official doctrine in the US. Now, USAID is the principal entity that promotes the economic and strategic interests of the US across the globe as part of counterinsurgency operations. Its departments dedicated to transition initiatives, reconstruction, conflict management, economic development, governance and democracy are the main venues through which millions of dollars are filtered from Washington to political parties, NGOs, student organizations and movements that promote US agenda worldwide. Wherever a coup d’état, a colored revolution or a regime change favorable to US interests occurs, USAID and its flow of dollars is there.”

 Geopolitics_F_Real.Threat.for.EU.peace.USASo what are color revolutions? According Golinger: “. . . The procedure is often the same. Sponsored students and youth movements lead the way with a new face, attracting others to join in as though it were the fashion, the cool thing to do. There’s always a logo, a color, a marketing strategy. In Serbia, the group OTPOR, which led the overthrow of Slobodan Milosevic, hit the streets with t-shirts, posters and flags boasting a fist in black and white, their symbol of resistance. In Ukraine, the logo remained the same, but the color changed to orange. In Georgia, it was a rose-colored fist, and in Venezuela, instead of the closed fist, the hands are open, in black and white, to add a little variety.”

Vladimir Putting stated: “Today almost un-contained hyper use of military force in international relations is plunging the world into an abyss of permanent conflicts.” Adds Russian General L. Ivashov: “Terrorism is simply a new type of war in order to install a unipolar world, a pretext to establish the rule of a world élite.”

Bruno P. Gebarski

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Blackwater, Central Banking, Color Revolution, Corruption, Coup d'état, Facebook, Fascism, Geopolitics, Germany, Middle East, Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO, NED, Neo Con, NGO, NWO, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Russia, Sergey Lavrov, Social Media, Twitter, Ukraine, USA, Vladimir Putin, YouTube

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part Three)

We are being told by (German) Main Stream Media that Migrants are warmly accepted by the Germans (obviously things changed after the violence that took place on New Year’s Eve in Cologne, Düsseldorf and Hamburg). But is it or was it really so? Boatloads of “refugees” are originating from Northern Africa’s U.S. war-torn zones such as Libya, Tunisia, Syria, Iraq and Eurasian Afghanistan.

This kind of mass migration acceptance would not be possible without the support (propaganda) of the German Main Stream Media as Udo Ulfkotte showed in his book “Gekaufte Journalisten – Bought Journalists”.  Interesting to notice that a survey results presented to the Germans: “Welcome Refugees to Germany“ never mentioned that

Clipboard_Image 050

Source: quer-denken.tv

19,2% of the tweets originated from the UK, 17% from the U.S. and 5% from Australia! How on earth can the UK, U.S. and Australia represent the veracity of the German‘s reaction and perception to the Migrant crisis when only 6,4% of the tweets originated from Germany?

We now know that 75%-80% of the migrants are healthy and vibrant young men being purposely sent to Germany and Austria! They arrive by boat mostly financed by the U.S.: do watch this excellent video breaking down what is happening between Libya and Europe. The „choice“ of „refugees“ moved to Germany/Austria must be carefully „chosen“ as the bulk of them are „healthy and full of vitality“ as we were able to witness in „New Year‘s Eve attacks on women“ in the second and fourth largest German cities of Hamburg and Cologne (Köln).

This „migration scheme“ seems well organized.  Austrian authorities know that “paperless migrants“ arrive without phones but are given a smartphone after going through “local authority procedures.”  It’s impossible to acquire a mobile phone in Austria or Germany without showing personal identification, a residential address and a bank account: “it’s for security reason” we have been told! So how can unregistered migrants be given smartphones?  Who is giving it to them including A1 Austrian Network SIM-cards? Who is footing the bill? Could it be the owner of Austrian A1, Carlos Slim the Mexican billionaire and second richest man in the world?

With smart phones not only can migrants call families back home, which is very understandable, of course, but also instantly organize flash mobs – or other joint activities that do not correspond to the practices of the local population!” Think New Year’s Eve (terrorist) attacks on women in Cologne and Hamburg.  Things are rarely given for free unless Return on Investment (ROI) is to be expected. So, what sort of ROI are we here talking about? Is the Establishment trying to create social tension within Germany and Austria’s while weakening the economic heartland of Europe?

Germany’s federal states are planning to spend around EUR 17 billion ($18.7 billion) on dealing with the refugee crisis in 2016, the newspaper Die Welt said on Tuesday, citing a survey it conducted among their finance ministries. The sum, bigger than the EUR 15.3 billion that the central government planned to allocate to its education and research ministry in 2015, is a measure of the strain that the influx is causing across the country as a whole.“

In 2015, the German government is going to spend more money on its Migrant crisis than on its education! Have the Germans been democratically asked about This? No! They have not. Dr. Prof. Michael Vogt from Quer-Denken TV is suggesting that the Migrant crisis is specifically targeted to Germany and Austria: Europe’s two strongest economies. The destructive results of mass migration will be felt on both sides for a long time to come. While Migrants will never feel home, Germans are being robbed of their homeland identity.

Dr. Thomas P. M. Barnett‘s bizarre geopolitical views could give the creeps to any sound minded individual listening to his material. Probably a derailed geostrategic genius! One of his strategies for Europe (to remain a U.S. vassal) could be very enhanced and accelerated by long term „Mingling of races“ – a targeted strategy of the New World Order.”

„In his books ‘The Pentagon’s New Map‘ – meaning so to speak – the US-Defense-Ministry’s new version of the world map and ‘Blueprint for ActionDr. Thomas P. M. Barnett turns out to be a cynical supporter of globalization. He claims that the final goal of globalization is ‘the synchronization of all the countries on earth‘. To be achieved, as he says, through a ‘mingling of the races.'” “According to Barnett, In Europe a light-brown race would emerge this way with an average intelligence quotient of 90 – ideal working slaves. Barnett warns in his books against ‘irrational people who will fight against this mingling of races’. He continues in a threatening tone, pointing out that he certainly takes notice of the irrational arguments of their opponents. However if they should put up any resistance against the global world order – he demands ‘we should kill them.'”

So what could be the reasons for the Establishment to threaten Germany with this Weapon of Mass Migration? According Kelly M. Greenhill, Author of “Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy”, this type of asymmetrical warfare has been used more than fifty times in the second part of the 20th Century.

Clipboard_Image 053

So is Germany the recent victim of Weapons of Mass Migration? Is Angela Merkel, the German Kanzler(in) coerced by the U.S. (and her oath of allegiance) to accept this flood of migrants pouring in into Germany?  What is the geopolitical goal of this “organized” human tidal wave?  What are the possible reasons for Germany to be under U.S., Britain and  France’s geopolitical attack?

  1. The inner strength of the German (and Austrian) economies: the only two EU-candidates still resisting the destruction of the fascist Euro straitjacket and the EU’s financial looting?
  2. The renewed Nord Stream 2 pipeline Gazprom agreements between Germany and Russia from whom Germany imports 40% of its gas and 30% of its crude oil?
  3. A worse conceivable U.S. threat: Germany and Russia become allies again! The reason for a U.S. coup d’état in Ukraine and how the U.S. coerced Europe into imposing economic sanctions upon Russia?
  4. Angela Merkel’s CDU being reluctant to sign TTIP, the fascist, kleptocrat and oligarch U.S. agreement that would remove the little of what is left of our German/European sovereignty?
  5. Germany and France (François Hollande) turning their support towards Russia in their common fight against ISIS, the U.S. terror subsidiary led by the CIA?
  6. France and Germany creating a split within the Western Alliance of NATO by turning towards Russia in attacking ISIS?

The German leadership’s psychological game is evil, subtle and refined. It abuses its national shameful past: The WWII Jewish holocaust. This emotional shameful “weapon” is used by the government, institutions, medias and NGOs against its own people with the aim of marginalizing citizens expressing legitimate concerns about the migrants such as costs, violence (as exemplified during new year’s eve events in Cologne) and terrorism. They are automatically stamped as “intolerant”, “right extremist” or even “Nazi”: a feeling Germans do not want to be reminded of or associated with because of the difficult past of their national history.

Clipboard_Image 054

A final quote from Joschka Fischer former German Minister and Vice-Bundeskanzler

“The plundering of Germany; a raison d’état”

Germany is the problem, because the Germans are more diligent, disciplined and talented than the rest of Europe. This will always lead to inequalities. But it can be counter measured by moving as much money as possible outside of Germany. It does not matter for what it is, even if it is radically wasted – the main thing, the Germans do not have it and already the world is saved.” —Joseph Martin “Joschka” Fischer

Bruno P. Gebarski

Further Reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)


Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, Geopolitics, Germany, Middle East, Migrant, Refugees, Russia, Syria, USA