Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)

Revisiting the Libyan crisis and how Libya was doing prior to “NATO’s democratic liberation” from the alleged “Tyran and Despode” Muammar Gaddafi brings up much evidence against the West, France (then under the leadership of Nicolas Sarkozy), the U.S. and NATO.

Before the U.S., France, NATO and their “rebels” Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood began their murderous and destructive attacks on the country’s sovereignty, Libya

  • had no central bank
  • was the only debt-free nation in the world, in other words not controlled by western banking interest
  • had a lower percentage of people living below the poverty line than in the Netherlands
  • had a portion of its (Libyan) oil sales credited directly to the accounts of its citizens
  • had hardly any taxes, even enterprises were taxed only marginally
  • had its government abolish all food taxes in response to the rising food prices around the world. (Source: World Cheers as the CIA Plunges Libya into Chaos by David Rothscum, Axis of Logic)
  • had less than 5% of the population undernourished
  • had the highest gross domestic product (GDP) at purchasing power parity (PPP) per capita of all of Africa
  • had the highest life expectancy of all of Africa
  • had the lowest infant mortality rate of all of Africa
  • ranked 61st, with a lower incarceration rate than in the Czech republic

Before the U.S., France and NATO’s aggression on Libya, living as a Libyan citizen meant:

  • owning a home was a human right
  • receiving the equivalent of 45,000€ from the state as a newly-married couple
  • getting free electricity supply, free medical care and free education
  • only 25 percent of the Libyans could read, after Gaddafi’s reign 83 percent
  • emancipation of women already allowed by Gaddafi in the 70s
  • no prescription of any particular clothing style for women and high-quality education was available to all women if they wanted it

At this juncture, it is crucial to notice that NATO’s strike on Libya had been presented to us as the liberalization from a “rogue Gaddafi régime”, when actually Lybia was being ruled by an elected government. “[In 2011,] Muammar Gaddafi [was] not the president of Libya. In fact he [held] no official position in the government. This [was] the big mistake that people [made]. They claim[ed] that Muammar Gaddafi rule[d] over Libya when in fact he [did] not, his position [was] more or less ceremonial. [Muammar Gaddafi] should be compared to a founding father. The true leader of Libya [was] an indirectly elected prime-minister: Baghdadi Mahmudi. Calling Muammar Gaddafi the leader of Libya [would be] comparable to calling Akihito the leader of Japan …”

___Libya_Aquifer.System

So why would France, the U.S. and NATO want to remove this “alleged Libyan despot”, a man that carried out the world’s largest irrigation project in the world? “The largest irrigation system in the world also known as the great manmade river was designed to make water readily available to all Libyan’s across the entire country. It was funded by the Gaddafi government and it said that Gaddafi himself called it ‘the eighth wonder of the world.'”

 

As always, follow the Western cabal money trail!

Stop Gaddafi’s plan from establishing a gold-backed currency (Gold Dinar)

The [Gaddafi] gold-backed currency (the reason why John F. Kennedy was assassinated: Executive Order 11110), was ultimately planned to serve as a pan-African currency and thereby economically unite African nations and free them from Western central banking or “financial imperialism.”

According Global Research, “the Dinar was widely opposed by the [bankster cabal] of today’s society and who could blame them. African nations would have finally had the power to bring itself out of debt and poverty and only trade in this precious commodity. They would have been able to finally say ‘no’ to external exploitation and charge whatever they felt suitable for precious resources. It has been said that the gold Dinar was the real reason for the NATO led rebellion, in a bid to oust the outspoken leader.”

The free thought project reported: “NATO’s overthrow [of Libya] was not for the protection of the people, but instead it was to thwart Gaddafi’s attempt to create a gold-backed African currency to compete with the Western center banking monopoly. In spite of French-led U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973 creating a no-fly zone over Libya with the express intent of protecting civilians, one of the over 3,000 new Hillary Clinton emails released by the State Department on New Year’s Eve, contain damning evidence of Western nations using NATO as a tool to topple Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi. al banking monopoly.”

The email identifies French President Nicholas Sarkozy as leading the attack on Libya with five specific purposes in mind:

  1. Obtain Libyan oil
  2. Ensure French influence in the region
  3. Increase French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s reputation domestically
  4. Assert French military power
  5. Prevent Gaddafi’s influence in what is considered “Francophone Africa”

Furthermore: “This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French franc (CFA), thus the “huge threat that Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves, estimated at “143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver,” posed to the French franc (CFA) circulating as a prime African currency. (Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than $7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya.)”

Clipboard_Image 003

Hillary Rodahm Clinton: “We came, we saw, he died.

NATO/Western “claims” Muammar Gaddafi’s Libyan “bounty” of 144 tons of Gold

The gold bullion – held by the Libyan central bank and controlled by Colonel Gaddafi – [was] among the 25 largest reserves in the world, the Financial Times reported, citing the International Monetary Fund. As Paul Joseph Watson reported in Infowars.com: “Global central banks will now get to carve up Africa’s most oil-rich nation while simultaneously divvying up around 144 tons of gold bullion.”

In part nine, we’ll look at Benghazi, U.S. Ambassador John Christopher Stevens’ murder and NATO’s attack on Libya.

Further reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, France, Geopolitics, Germany, Libya, Middle East, Migrant, Refugees, Sarkozy, USA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s