Tag Archives: NGO

U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchs and Neocons’ Feudalistic Power Grab (Part Six)

There is a special breed of international financiers whose success typically is built upon certain character traits. Those include cold objectivity, immunity to patriotism, and indifference to the human condition. That profile is the basis for proposing a theoretical strategy, called the Rothschild Formula, which motivates such men to propel governments into war for the profits they yield… As long as the mechanism of central banking exists, it will be to such men an irresistible temptation to convert debt into perpetual war and war into perpetual debt.”        

  —G. Edward Griffin | Author of “The Creature from Jekyll Island

People, governments and economies of all nations must serve the needs of multinational banks and corporations.” 

—Zbigniew Brzezinski | Author of “The Grand Chessboard

Geopoliticalnews suggests a review of Part One, Part Two, Part Three of our series on “U.S. exceptionalism and its global terror management.” This alleged 21st century U.S. exceptionalism, Part Four and Part Five, doctrine is perfectly sustained by a the resurgence of virulent brand of neocon propaganda spewed by major U.S. newspapers with its goons and stooges: Part Four and Part Five.

We saw how this swaggering super-arrogant superpower, cowboys-on-steroids, imperialist U.S.A. continues to spread its “gospel of democracy”, mostly with coup d’états and wars (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Ukraine, to name just a few) and defend its fiat currency: USD, EUR, GBP and YEN system against the rising alternative offered by the BRICS, China’s SCO, AIIB, the new Shanghai Gold Exchange, the Financial Future Exchange (CFFEX), the CIPS, and the (Chinese) Renminbi, which entered the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on October 1st of 2016. We reviewed the neocon financial tools: Quantitative Easing (QE) “to infinity” and derivative products such as Credit Default Swaps (CDS) as a way of kicking the financial can down the road and saw how ECB, FED, BOE and BOJ Central Banks destroy capital for the sake of bailing out the too-big-to-jail financial institutions.

As Dr. Stephen J. Sniegoski writes in: Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel: “It was only the traumatic effects of the 9/11 terrorism that enabled the agenda of the neocons to become the policy of the United States of America.”

Where is the judicial foundation of all those U.S.-wars and coup d’états? Was the U.S., Britain or France threatened by Libya? What’s the heck were France (with its French President neocon Sarkozy) and Britain doing bombing Libya? Why were France and Britain meddling in Africa’s richest country and attacking its sovereignty instead of minding their own business and rebuilding their crumbling road-infrastructure or reducing their astronomic public debts, both in excess of two billion Euro?

What is Germany doing bombing Syria with the US-Allies and supporting the Empire of Chaos’ neocon imperialistic agenda instead of protecting the sovereignty of its own German territory? Where is the balance between the executive, legislative and judicial branches with its system of checks and balances? How could Angela Merkel have overstepped the judicial raison d’être of the German constitution to open Germany’s borders on September the 4th of 2015? Did Merkel consult with her government? Did Merkel democratically ask the German People?

How about the 9/11 hijacking of the U.S. Democracy? Shouldn’t have the legislative branch of the U.S government, represented by Congress, the House of Representatives and the Senate, been active? How come the U.S. Congress did not impeach the Bushes, Clinton’s and alleged Kenyan Squatter in Chief himself for drug trafficking and/or war crimes? Could not these be the signs of a resurging “democratic totalitarianism” just about to transform itself into outright fascism? Are we becoming a dystopian society?  Remember Henry Gouroux’s observation on oligarchy aka plutocracy and kleptocracy? 

The western world has being taken captive by oligarchs, plutocrats and kleptocrats represented by key cartel groups ruling the world of finances and business: We could call them the profiteering beneficiaries who can be easily classified in seven different industrial cartels: Finance, Media, Energy, Military, Pharmacy, Chemy and food:

1. Finance cartel

  • World Bank | USA
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) | USA
  • The Institute for the Works of Religion | Vatican Bank | Italy
  • Bank of International  Settlements (BIS) | Switzerland
  • Private Federal Reserve Bank (FED) | USA
  • Bank of England (BOE) | Britain
  • European Central Bank (ECB) | Germany
  • Bank of Japan (BOJ) | Japan
  • JP Morgan Chase & Co. | USA
  • Goldman Sachs | USA
  • Citigroup Inc | USA
  • Wells Fargo & Co. | USA
  • Bank of America | USA
  • BNP Paribas | France
  • Deutsche Bank | Germany

2. Media cartel

  • Google | USA | USD 74.64 billion
  • Walt Disney | USA | USD 52.46 billion
  • Comcast | USA | USD 75.51 billion
  • 21st Century Fox | USA | USD 28.99 billion
  • Facebook | USA | USD 17.93 billion
  • Bertelsmann | Germany | USD 17.14 billion
  • Viacom | USA | USD 13.27 billion
  • CBS | USA | USD 13.89 billion
  • Baidu | China | USD 66.4 billion
  • News Corp | USA | USD 33.7 billion

___geopolitics_part-6_7-sisters-energy-cartel_023. Energy cartel: “Seven Sisters” which became the Super Majors

4. Military cartel:

  • Lockheed Martin | USA
  • Boeing | USA
  • BAE Systems | UK
  • Raytheon | USA
  • General Dynamics | USA
  • Northrop Grumman | USA
  • Airbus Group | FRA & GER | EU

5. Pharmacy cartel

  • Johnson & Johnson | USA | ÚSD 70.07 billion
  • Novartix | Switzerland | USD 49.4 billion
  • Roche | Switzerland| CHF 48.14 billion
  • Pfizer | USA | USD 48.85 billion
  • Sanofi | France | EUR 37.05 billion
  • Merck Group | Germany | EUR 11.36 billion
  • Glaxo Smith Kline; GSK | Britain | GBP 23.92 billion  

6. Chemy cartel

  • BASF | Germany | USD 78.70 billion
  • Dow Chemical | USA | USD 58.2 billion
  • Sinopec | China | USD 58 billion
  • SABIC | Saudi Arabia | USD 43.3 billion
  • Exxon Mobil | USA | USD 38.2 billion
  • Formosa Plastics | Taiwan | USD 37.1 billion
  • Lyondell Basell Industries | USA | USD 34.8 billion
  • DuPont| USA | USD 29.9 billion
  • Ineos | Switzerland | USD 54 billion
  • Bayer | Germany | USD 28.1 billion

___geopolitics_part-6_10-larges-food-biz7. Food cartel

  • Nestlé | Switzerland | CHF 88.8 billion
  • Pepsi Co. | USA | USD 63.06 billion
  • Unilever | Britain and Netherlands | EUR 53.27 billion
  • Coca Cola | USA | USD 44.29 billion
  • Mars | USA | USD 33 billion
  • Mondelēz | USA | USD 29.6 billion
  • Danone | France | EUR 22.41 billion
  • General Mills | USA | USD 16.6 billion
  • Kellogg’s | USA| USD 14.8 billion
  • Associated British Foods | Britain | GBP 12.8 billion

Bruno Gebarski

Leave a comment

Filed under AIIB, Angela Merkel, BRICS, Central Banking, China, Color Revolution, Corruption, Fascism, France, Geopolitics, Germany, IMF, Migrant, NED, Neo Con, New Development Bank, NGO, NWO, Refugees, Renminbi, Russia, Sarkozy, SCO, SDR, SGE, Syria, USA, USD, WWI, WWII, WWIII, Yuan

Washington Tries to Break BRICS —Rape of Brazil Begins

 

Brazil, August 2016: Another US-Coup d’état organized by its Washington rogue régime: It was about setting up the new US-vassal Brazilian President: Michel Temer (done) and “privatize” aka steal Brazil state’s owned assets (oil, water, electricity belonging to the Brazilian people) for the benefit of the Wall Street and London City bankster cabal: More of the same as the ongoing Washington coup-d’état campaign-spree goes on.

This article was written by F. William Engdahl exclusively for the online magazine  New Eastern Outlook under the title:  Washington tries to break BRICS —Rape of Brazil Begins

“Washington’s regime change machinery has for the time being succeeded in removing an important link in the alliance of large emerging nations by railroading through a Senate impeachment of the duly elected President [Washington’s new color revolution aka coup d’état],  Dilma Rousseff. On August 31 her Vice President Michel Temer was sworn in as President. In his first speech as president, the cynical Temer called for a government of ‘national salvation,’ asking for the trust of the Brazilian people. He indicated plans to reform, and has also signaled his intention to overhaul the pension system and labor laws, and cut public spending, all themes beloved of Wall Street banks, of the International Monetary Fund and their Washington Consensus. Now after less than three weeks at the job, Michel Temer has unveiled plans for wholesale privatization of Brazil’s crown jewels, starting with oil. The planned Wall Street rape of Brazil is about to begin (emphasis throughtout: Geopoliticalnews.)

It’s important to keep in mind that elected President Rousseff was not convicted or even formally charged with any concrete act of corruption, even though the pro-oligarchy mainstream Brazil media, led by O’Globo Group of the billionaire Roberto Irineu Marinho, ran a media defamation campaign creating the basis to railroad Dilma Rousseff into formal impeachment before the Senate. The shift took place after the opposition PMDB [Brazilian Democratic Movement Party] party of Temer on March 29 broke their coalition with Rousseff’s Workers’ Party, as accusations of Petrobras-linked corruption were made against Dilma Rousseff and former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

On August 31, 61 Senators voted to remove her while 20 voted against removal. The formal charge was ‘manipulation of the state budget’ before the 2014 elections to hide the size of the deficit. She vehemently denies the charge. Indeed, the Senate issued its own expert report that concluded there was ‘no indication of direct or indirect action by Dilma’ in any illegal budgetary maneuvers. According to the Associated Press, ‘Independent auditors hired by Brazil’s Senate said in a report released Monday that suspended President Dilma Rousseff didn’t engage in the creative accounting she was charged with at her impeachment trial.’ Under an honest system that would have ended the impeachment then and there. Not in Brazil.

In effect, she was impeached for the dramatic decline in the Brazilian economy, a decline deliberately pushed along as US credit rating agencies downgraded Brazilian debt, and international and mainstream Brazilian media kept the Petrobras corruption allegations in the spotlight. Importantly, the Senate did not ban her from office for 8 years as Washington had hoped, and she has promised an electoral return. The Washington —steered Michel Temer has until end of 2018 to deliver Brazil to Temer‘s foreign masters before his term legally ends.

Notably, Temer himself was accused of corruption in the Petrobras state oil company investigations. He reportedly asked the then-head of the transportation unit of Petróleo Brasileiro SA in 2012 to arrange illegal campaign contributions to Temer’s party which was running a Washington-backed campaign to oust Rousseff’s Workers’ Party. Then this June, only days into his serving as acting president, two of Temer’s own chosen ministers, including the Minister of Transparency, were forced to resign in response to allegations that they sought to subvert the probe into massive graft at Petrobras.

One of the two, Temer’s extremely close ally Romero Jucá, was caught on tape plotting Dilma’s impeachment as a way to shut down the ongoing Petrobras corruption investigation, as well as indicating that Brazil’s military, the media, and the courts were all participants in the impeachment plotting.

In brief, the removal of Dilma Rousseff and her Workers’ Party after 13 years in Brazil’s leadership was a new form of Color Revolution from Washington [same neocon procedure as ususal,] one we might call a judicial coup by corrupt judges and congressmen. Of the 594 members of the Congress, as the Toronto Globe and Mail reported, ‘318 are under investigation or face charges’ while their target, President Rousseff, ‘herself faces no allegation of financial impropriety.’

The day after the first Lower House impeachment vote in April, a leading member of Temer’s PSDP party, Senator Aloysio Nunes, went to Washington, in a mission organized by former Bill Clinton Secretary of State Madeline Albright’s lobbying firm, Albright Stonebridge Group. Nunes, as president of the Brazilian Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, has repeatedly advocated that Brazil once again move closer to an alliance with the US and UK.

Madeline Albright, a Director of the leading US [neocon] think-tank, Council on Foreign Relations, is also chair of the prime US Government “Color Revolution” NGO, the National Democratic Institute (NDI). Nothing fishy here, or? Nunes reportedly went to Washington to rally backing for Temer and the unfolding judicial coup against Rousseff.

A key player from the side of Washington, Rousseff’s de facto political executioner, was, once again, Vice President Joe Biden, the ‘Dick Cheney’ dirty operator-in-chief in the Obama Administration.

Biden’s fateful Brazil trip

In May, 2013, US Vice President Joe Biden made a fateful visit to Brazil to meet with President Rousseff. In January 2011 Rousseff had succeeded her Workers’ Party mentor, Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, or Lula, who constitutionally was limited to two consecutive terms. Biden went to Brazil to discuss oil with the new President. Relations between Lula and Washington had chilled as Lula backed Iran against US sanctions and came economically closer to China.

__geopolitics_p_brazil_oil_iara-oil-filed-santos-basin_02In late 2007 Petrobras had discovered what was estimated to be a mammoth new basin of high-quality oil on the Brazilian Continental Shelf offshore in the Santos Basin. In total the Brazil Continental Shelf could contain over 100 billion barrels of oil, transforming the country into a major world oil and gas power, something Exxon and Chevron, the US oil giants wanted to control.”

In an article published in May this year,  U.S. corporations target Brazil’s oil industry, German Economy News (Deutsche Wirtschaftsnachrichten) reported: “Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff is nearing impeachment. Brazilian politicians have contacted influential US senators in Washington. They are hoping for an alliance. The U.S. corporations want to gain influence on the Brazilian oil sector.” Doesn’t this remind us of Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Ukraine and Yemen? A familiar six-step U.S.-takeover isn’t it? 

  1. Activate U.S.-NGOs on the ground
  2. Promote your “liberation” message via social media channels: Twitter and Facebook
  3. Don’t forget your flash-mobs (think of Cologne 2015 Newyear’s eve)
  4. Ad a touch of local “liberating” terrorism
  5. Enhance, if not sufficient, with Academi hired mercenaries (Kiev Maidan vintage)

Bravo! You’ve just created your perfect color revolution and/or coup d’état. You now may replace the local leadership with your “democratically re-elected” pro-Washington neocon goons! Do not forget to round off your “democratization undertaking” with ongoing and sufficient main stream media propaganda (Geopoliticalnews.)

 

__geopolitics_p_brazil_oil_iara-oil-filed-santos-basin_01Engdhal goes on to write: “In 2009, according to leaked US diplomatic cables published by Wikileaks, the US Consulate in Rio wrote that Exxon and Chevron were trying in vain to alter a law advanced by Rousseff’s mentor and predecessor in her Brazilian Workers’ Party , President Luis Inacio Lula da Silva. That 2009 law made the state-owned Petrobras chief operator of all offshore oil blocs. Washington and the US oil giants were not at all pleased at losing control over potentially the largest new world oil discovery in decades.

Lula had not only pushed ExxonMobil and Chevron out of the controlling position in favor of the state-owned Petrobras, but he also opened Brazilian oil exploration to the Chinese, since 2009 a core member of the BRICS developing nations with Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa.

In December, 2010 in one of his last acts as President, Lula oversaw signing of a deal between the Brazilian-Spanish energy company Repsol and China’s state-owned Sinopec. Sinopec formed a joint venture, Repsol Sinopec Brasil, investing more than $7.1 billion towards Repsol Brazil. Already in 2005 Lula had approved formation of Sinopec International Petroleum Service of Brazil Ltd as part of a new strategic alliance between China and Brazil.

In 2012 in a joint exploration drilling, Repsol Sinopec Brasil, Norway’s Statoil and Petrobras made a major new discovery in Pão de Açúcar, the third in block BM-C-33, which includes the Seat and Gávea, the latter one of the world’s 10 largest discoveries in 2011. USA and British oil majors were nowhere to be seen.

Biden’s task was to sound out Lula’s successor, Rousseff, about reversing that exclusion of US major oil companies in favor of the Chinese. Biden also met with leading energy companies in Brazil including Petrobras.

While little was publicly said, Rousseff refused to reverse the 2009 oil law in a way that would be suitable to Biden, Washington and US oil majors. Days after Biden’s visit came the Snowden NSA revelations that the US had also spied on Rousseff and top officials of Petrobras. She was livid and denounced the Obama Administration that September before the UN General Assembly for violating international law. She cancelled a planned Washington visit in protest. After that, US-Brazil relations took a dive.

After his May 2013 talks with Rousseff, Biden clearly gave her the kiss of death.

Before Biden’s May 2013 visit Dilma Rousseff had 70% of popularity rating. Less than two weeks after Biden left Brazil, nationwide protests by a very well-organized group called Movimento Passe Livre, over a nominal 10 cent bus fare increase, brought the country virtually to a halt and turned very violent. The protests bore the hallmark of typical “Color Revolution” or Twitter social media destabilizations that seem to follow Biden wherever he makes a presence. Within weeks Rousseff’s popularity plummeted to 30%.

Washington had clearly sent a signal that Rousseff had to change course or face serious problems. The Washington regime change machine, including its entire array of financial warfare operations ranging from a leaked PwC audit of Petrobras to Wall Street credit rating agency Standard & Poors’ downgrade of Brazil public debt to junk in September 2015, went into full action to remove Rousseff, a key backer of the BRICS New Development Bank and of an independent national development strategy for Brazil.

Selling the Crown Jewels

The man who has now manipulated himself into the Presidency, the corrupt Michel Temer, worked as an informer for Washington the entire time. In documents released by Wikileaks, it was revealed that Temer was an informant to US intelligence since at least 2006, via telegrams to the US embassy in Brazil classified by the Embassy as “sensitive” and “for official use only.”

Washington’s man in Brazil, Temer, has lost no time appeasing his patrons in Wall Street. Even as acting President this May, Temer named Henrique Meirelles as Minister of Finance and Social Security. Meirelles, a Harvard-educated former President of the Brazilian central bank, was President of BankBoston in the USA until 1999, and was with that bank in 1985 when it was found guilty of failing to report $1.2 billion in illegal cash transfers with Swiss banksMeirelles is now overseeing the planned selloff of Brazil’s “crown jewels” to international investors, a move that is intended to gravely undercut the power of the state in the economy. Another of Temer’s key economic advisers is Paulo Leme, former IMF economist and now Goldman Sachs Managing Director of Emerging Markets ResearchWall Street is in the middle of the Temer-led economic rape of Brazil (emphasis throughout Geopoliticalnews.)

On September 13, Temer’s government unveiled a massive privatization program with the cynically misleading comment, ‘It is clear the public sector cannot move forward alone on these projects. We are counting on the private sector.’ He omitted to say the private sector he meant were his patrons.

Temer unveiled plans that would complete the country’s largest privatization in decades. Conveniently, the process us to be completed by end of 2018, just before Temer’s term must end. The influential US-Brazil Business Council detailed the privatization list on its website. The US-Brazil Business Council was founded forty years ago by Citigroup, Monsanto, Coca-Cola, Dow Chemicals and other US multinationals.

Tenders for the first round of concessions will be issued before the end of this year. They will include privatization of four airports and two port terminals, all auctioned in the first quarter of 2017. Other concessions include five highways, one rail line, bidding on small oil blocks and a later round for large, mainly offshore, oil development blocks. As well the government will sell selected assets currently controlled by its Minerals Research Department plus six electric power distributors and three water treatment facilities.

The heart of his planned privatization are, not surprisingly, Joe Biden’s coveted state oil and gas companies along with chunks of the state Eletrobrás power company. Temer plans to get as much as $24 billion from the selloff. Fully $11 billion of the total are to come from sale of key oil and gas state holdings. Of course, when state assets such as huge oil and gas resources are sold off to foreign interests in what will clearly be a distress sale, it is a one-off deal. State oil and gas or electric power projects generate a continuing revenue stream many times any one-off privatization gainsBrazil’s economy is the ultimate loser in such privatization. Wall Street banks and multinationals are of course, as planned, the winner.

On September 19-21, according to the US-Brazil Business Council website, the Brazilian government’s key ministers for infrastructure including Minister Moreira Franco; Minister Fernando Bezerra Coelho Filho, Minister of Mines and Energy; and Minister Mauricio Quintella Lessa, Minister of Transport, Ports and Civil Aviation, will be in New York City to meet with Wall Street ‘infrastructure investors.’

This is Washington’s way, the way of the Wall Street Gods of Money, as I title one of my books. First, destroy any national leadership intent on genuine national development such as Dilma Rousseff. Replace them with a vassal regime willing to do anything for money, including selling the crown jewels of their own nation as people like Anatoli Chubais did in Russia in the 1990’s under Boris Yeltsin’s ‘shock therapy.’ As reward for his behavior, Chubais today sits on the advisory board of JP MorganChase. What will Temer and associates get for their efforts remains to be seen. Washington for now has broken one of the BRICS that ultimately threaten her global hegemony. It is not likely to bring any lasting success if recent history is any guide.”

F. William Engdahl

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
http://journal-neo.org/2016/09/24/washington-tries-to-break-brics-rape-of-brazil-begins/

Additional Reading:

  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part One)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part Two)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | September 11th 2001 and the Rise of U.S. Neocons (Part Three)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Preemptive Strike & Neocons Mainstream Media Propaganda (Part Four)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchy and Neocons Destructive Agenda (Part Five)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchy and Neocons Destructive Agenda (Part Six: coming soon)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | U.S.-NATO Serbian Genocide (Part Seven: planned)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Iraq the War for Oil and Control of the Middle East (Part Eight: planned)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Iraq the War for OIL and Control of the Middle East (Part Nine: planned)

Leave a comment

Filed under Academi, BRICS, Central Banking, Color Revolution, Corruption, Coup d'état, Facebook, Fascism, Germany, IMF, Neo Con, Social Media, Twitter, USA

NATO’s list of demands for Russia

This article is taken from the following website Fort Russ. The original title is: NATO’s list of demands for Russia

This is what the West, as well as some enlightened citizens in Russia, who call themselves “free people” and who wish our country only good, demand from Russia:

Geopolitics_F_Noam.Chomsky.Neoliberalism

  • Lift the siege on Aleppo. [Syria]
  • Do not kill terrorists worldwide, which receive funding from the United States, Qatar, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia. [Al Qaeda, ISIS, IS, Daesh are all CIA tools created by the US since the its intervention into the Soviet Afghan war in the 80s.]
  • Do not interfere with the laying of gas pipelines from Qatar to Europe. [Alternative line is from Iran-Iraq-Syria and on to Europe]

__clipboard_image_16

  • Do not obstruct the U.S. Navy from amassing a fleet in the Black sea close to the Maritime borders of Russia. [Of course the U.S. want that base for their aggressive and nefarious NATO war games.]
  • Return Crimea to their puppet Ukraine, in order to station a NATO fleet and missile bases there. [Crimea should be annexed by the U.S. Neo-Nazi fascist “Ukrainian” government: i.e. Svoboda political party supported by the EU and the U.S.]

MiddleEast_P_Qatar.Turkey.GasLine

  • Do not lay gas pipelines to Europe. [of course not: The U.S. wants its own control of European gas supply from Qatar via Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria who refuses since backing up the competitive pipeline sponsored by Russia: Gazprom and China from Iran via Iraq, Syria and on to Europe.]
  • Do not stop Ukraine’s blackmailing Russia for gas transit.
  • Do not demand payments of debts from Ukraine.
  • Do not interfere with the placement of NATO bases in Georgia and Ukraine, on Russia’s borders, and along with this to refuse support for Donbass.
  • Do not interfere with the work of foreign “charities” and NGO’s: [Fueling color revolutions such as Ukraine, Georgia, Egypt, Afghanistan, Serbia, Tunisia, Syria and Iraq.]

Politics_F_USA_6.Step.US.Strategy.4.Regime.Takeover

  • Do not declare those Russian mass media outlets to be foreign agents which are receiving financing from abroad and acting in the interests of other countries.
  • Do not oppose the Russian opposition, requiring the government to concede to the West everything it wants
  • Do not take actions that prevent the domination of the [toxic fiat paper money] U.S. Dollar around the world.
  • Do not enter into international agreements that intend to limit the reach of the U.S.’s global control.
  • Do not increase military expenditure.
  • Do not build the Nicaragua canal.

___Geopolitics_Quote.Bruno.Gebarski

  • Do not interfere with American ambassadors engaged in spying on Russia.
  • Do not seek to rebuild ties with former Soviet Republics.
  • Completely pull back from the North Caucasus.
  • Do not interfere with republics inside of Russia Republics pushing for the democratic right to self-determination and secession from Russia.
  • Do not interfere with Siberia and the Far East and the “help” they are receiving from the “international community” in determining the issue of their statehood.
  • Do not interfere with Kaliningrad’s secession from Russia and becoming a member of the EU.
  • To generally, as much as possible, close Russia until the end of time.
  • Do not forget to hand over their nuclear weapons to the UN and NATO.
  • Treat mineral reserves fairly which only happen to be in what was once Russia, and to hand them over to be managed by the global democratic community.

Source: Fort Russ. The original title is: NATO’s list of demands for Russia.

 

Bruno Gebarski

 

Leave a comment

Filed under China, Fascism, Middle East, NATO, Neo Con, NGO, NWO, Russia, Syria, USA, Vladimir Putin

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and US-led “Terror Management” | NATO’s Totalitarian Expansion | Neo-Conservatism | NGOs and Color Revolutions

EU_Gorbachev_EUSSIn the previous blog article, we reviewed how post WWI U.S. replaced the British Empire with the start of the private Federal Reserve and post WWII 1944 Bretton Woods agreements with the establishment of the U.S. Dollar as world currency; the 1971 de-pegging of the USD from gold, the 1973 Rockefeller’s crude oil quadrupled price heist also known as “Oil Crisis”, the 1989 Berlin wall events that reunited Germany and triggered the destruction of the Union of the Socialist States of Russia (USSR) and the promise the United States made to the Soviet Union (now Russia) not to use German Reunification as an opportunity for NATO‘s expansion.

Totalitarian Democracies | Neocolonialism | Color Revolutions

Why would the United States of America embarrass its Western European allies and break its promise? A few months later, on March the 12th of 1999, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland became full members of NATO. In 2004, on March the 29th, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia joined the ranks of NATO, and last but not least, Albania and Croatia in 2009!

Color Revolution is a neocolonialism form of 21st century warfare! I would like to suggest color revolutions as a  cyber- or net-centric digital warfare form of the old fashioned coup d’état. Why digital? Because the U.S. army, transnational crime organizations and NGOs, among others, use social media platforms such as Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, ask.fm, Tumblr in a highly sophisticated and coordinated manner (flashmobs) to disseminate their propaganda via social swarming:

“Tweeting the Arab Spring? That’s so 2010. A future tactic in cyber-based-information warfare is built upon mobile-media wielding e-citizen soldiers employing social swarming tactics to overwhelm a system, a decision maker, or a critical node. These mobile networks are vital to starting and maintaining cyber-based insurgency, drawing physical and moral strength from super-empowered individuals, while also using super-connected-individual networks to spread information, move undetected, and muster support, constantly one step ahead of authorities. It is possible for this swarm to move from the online world into the real world where violence may ensue.” (source: usacac.army) It is one of the many venues Western totalitarian democracies (such as the U.S. and its EU vassal state) use. Totalitarian democracy is a term that F. William Engdahl coined in his challenging book: “Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order.”
In the articleNeo-Cons for human rights” Tony Cartalucci makes a very insightful statement about Neo-Conservatism: “As counter-intuitive as it may sound, a great deal of Neo-Conservatives are deeply involved in human rights. One may wonder in what capacity, since this war mongering clique of big-business connected scoundrels is renowned for its role in the most unprecedented, flagrant, and grievous human rights violations in American history.”
The United States of America, NATO and the European Union use some of the following tools and tactics (alphabetically ordered)
  • Balkanisation of target countries and regions
  • Central Banking such as the Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of England (BoE) and Bank of Japan (BoJ)
  • Color Revolutions: Serbia/Kosovo, Georgia and Ukraine
  • Media propaganda via Western Press under U.S. CIA control
  • NATO as an international tool of neocolonialism expansion
  • Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
  • Social Media propaganda (Kosovo and Egypt) used by the military
  • Social Swarming military techniques (flachmobs, e-citizens)
  • War on Terror: a fictitious enemy that can be created any where any time with U.S. | Western | Saudi | Israeli army subsidiaries such as Al Qaeda, ISIS, IS, ISIL, Daesh or Blackwater: One of the many (170) private mercenaries firms employed by the U.S. during the war in Iraq.

to expand their geopolitical reach, sphere of “influence” and financial “thiefdom.” Just like the old communist iron curtain exemplified by the Berlin Wall, a similar “EU-Financial Wall” has been raised with the single European currency. As Prof. Dr. Politics_F_Friedrich.Hayek_ServitudeWilhelm Hankel used to say: Nineteen men of different heights and statures cannot expect a tailor to cut them one single suit to fit them all!” This is what the EUR is supposed to be; in the long term the EUR can only “survive” under the terms of financial fascism and slavery countries such as Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and France are already experiencing.

Colored revolutions always occur in a nation with strategic, natural resources: gas, oil, military bases and geopolitical interests. And they also take place in countries with socialist-leaning, anti-imperialist governments. The movements promoted by US agencies in those countries are generally anti-communist, anti-socialist, pro-capitalist and pro-imperialist.” writes international lawyer and consultant Eva Golinger In her article “Colored Revolutions, a New Form of Régime Change Made in the USA:”

“In 1983, the strategy of overthrowing inconvenient governments and calling it ‘democracy promotion’ was born. Through the creation of a private ‘foundations’ also known as Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs)” such as:

  • Canva: Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies
  • Albert Einstein Institution (AEI): Advancing freedom through non violent action”
  • Freedom House: 75 years championing democracy
  • International Center for Non-Violent Conflict (ICNC): “Nonviolent conflict is a way for people to fight for rights”
  • International Republican Institute (IRI): “Advancing Democracy Worldwide” (Board of directors: John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Brent Scowcroft)
  • National Democratic Institute (NDI): “Support and strengthen democratic institutions worldwide”
  • National Endowment for Democracy (NED): “Supporting freedom around the world freedom, justice, self-determination, and accountable government, through the use of civil resistance”
  • Project for the New American Century (PNAC)
  • USAID: “We partner to end extreme poverty and promote resilient, democratic societies while advancing our security and prosperity”

Politics_FF_VVladimir_Euro-Atlantic.Nations.Moving.From.Their.Roots_3

” . . . The Washington régime filters funding and strategic aid to political parties and groups abroad that promotes U.S. agenda in nations with insubordinate governments.” Golinger goes on to say: “Behind all these ‘foundations’ and ‘institutes’ is the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the financial branch of the Department of State. Today, USAID has become a critical part of the security, intelligence and defense axis in Washington. In 2009, the Inter-agency Counterinsurgency Initiative became official doctrine in the US. Now, USAID is the principal entity that promotes the economic and strategic interests of the US across the globe as part of counterinsurgency operations. Its departments dedicated to transition initiatives, reconstruction, conflict management, economic development, governance and democracy are the main venues through which millions of dollars are filtered from Washington to political parties, NGOs, student organizations and movements that promote US agenda worldwide. Wherever a coup d’état, a colored revolution or a regime change favorable to US interests occurs, USAID and its flow of dollars is there.”

 Geopolitics_F_Real.Threat.for.EU.peace.USASo what are color revolutions? According Golinger: “. . . The procedure is often the same. Sponsored students and youth movements lead the way with a new face, attracting others to join in as though it were the fashion, the cool thing to do. There’s always a logo, a color, a marketing strategy. In Serbia, the group OTPOR, which led the overthrow of Slobodan Milosevic, hit the streets with t-shirts, posters and flags boasting a fist in black and white, their symbol of resistance. In Ukraine, the logo remained the same, but the color changed to orange. In Georgia, it was a rose-colored fist, and in Venezuela, instead of the closed fist, the hands are open, in black and white, to add a little variety.”

Vladimir Putting stated: “Today almost un-contained hyper use of military force in international relations is plunging the world into an abyss of permanent conflicts.” Adds Russian General L. Ivashov: “Terrorism is simply a new type of war in order to install a unipolar world, a pretext to establish the rule of a world élite.”

Bruno P. Gebarski

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Blackwater, Central Banking, Color Revolution, Corruption, Coup d'état, Facebook, Fascism, Geopolitics, Germany, Middle East, Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO, NED, Neo Con, NGO, NWO, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Russia, Sergey Lavrov, Social Media, Twitter, Ukraine, USA, Vladimir Putin, YouTube

U.S. President Barack Obama’s Visit to Hannover | Brexit: End of the Anglosphere or Chinese Russian Threat to the London/Washington Financial Fiat Money Lords?

The end of the Anglo sphere as written recently in a Financial Times article should be attributed to a real Russia | China (SCO: Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, AIIB: Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and SGE: Shanghai Gold Exchange) threat to the Anglo-American Bankster Cabal fiat money trail (USD, GBP, EUR and YEN) hegemony; but certainly not to Britain’s [Br]exit from the European Union!

Is this the reason why the Establishment sent its Washington minion to Hannover (Germany) to make sure that vassal state Europe (and its leader Kanzler Merkel) obeys and dances to the tact of the Washington geopolitical chanson and neocolonialism agenda?

The fact that Britain has extended a financial arm towards China’s SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) and AIIB (Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank) is a thorn in the flesh of the Washington Régime struggling to defend its post-1971 USD fiat paper currency with “sister-paper-notes” EUR, GBP and YEN: more money cover-ups for the mighty king-dollar that could soon be dethroned by a gold backed Chinese Yuan!

Mayor of London Boris Johnson was accused of: “. . . ‘dog-whistle racism’ after suggesting that the ‘part-Kenyan’ Barack Obama has an ‘ancestral dislike of the British empire’ . . . Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP, said President [Barack Obama] should ‘butt out’, accusing him of being the most anti-British American president in history: ‘Mercifully, he won’t be in office for much longer.’”

I’ve often coined U.S President Barack Hussein Obama as the “Kenyan Squatter” but wrongly so! President Barack Obama, according the most official data, would have been born in Kenya in 1961 (was his U.S. birthcertificate forged?) A short overview of Kenya’s history is now à propos: Germans arrived in 1885 but handed the costal lines of former Kenyan territory to the British in 1888. “According to record, Kenya didn’t exist until 1963, two years after Obama was born and probably 27 years after his father’s birth . . . How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that didn’t yet exist and was known as “British East Africa Protectorate?” Kenyan Squatter ought to be renamed as: British East African Protectorate Squatter: Minutes stand as corrected!

Barack Obama’s (and Merkel) plaidoyer for Britain to remain in a “strong EU” is such of hypocritical duplicity! The United States agree to a “Strong Europe”, while at the same time promoting (with the help of Britain and France) the genocide of Europe’s strongest economy with an organized, and NGO financed, migrant German genocide? Maybe President Obama just wanted to reassure himself that Germany’s destruction was well under way! Let’s bear in mind that part of Washington’s geopolitical credo is to make sure that a Russian German entente Cordiale and rapprochement never takes place:  It is classified by geopolitical observer George Friedman as one of U.S. top geopolitical threats for ongoing 21st century U.S. hegemony. It is also the reason why the U.S. has “destabilized” Ukraine and offered Europe a vile coup d’état with the help of Erik Prince’ private Blackwater | Academi mercenaries!

Clipboard_Image 014Consider Blackwater as the new privatized face of the U.S. war machine, a classified group of mercenaries that handles “special U.S. assignments” such as the “Baghdad Bloody Sunday.” Prince’s Blackwater, that was awarded over a $1 billion in contracts from the U.S. State Department, is presently under Fed’s investigation! In the meanwhile, Erik Prince, former owner of Blackwater, whom we shall revisit in future installments, turned his back on Washington after he was thrown under the bus! he now offers his services to China (mostly in Africa) via Frontier Service Group. Further more, Erik Prince’ private forces would now operate in Libya “for the stated purpose of stopping the flow of refugees to Europe. Libya is one of the main routes from migrants trying to enter Europe from eastern Africa and parts of the central Sahel region. Prince has also long been interested in raising private military force to battle Islamic militant groups in a variety of countries.” Very much counterproductive to the U.S. (British and French) destabilization program in Northern Africa, part of the Middle East, the Ukraine, Georgia, the seven “Stans” (Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) and now Germany! One can obviously see why Eric Prince’ undertakings would be considered by Washington’s rogue régime as two military “faux-pas.

President Obama’s preaching against Brexit: What sort of duplicity and hypocrisy is this? Public Relation nonsense! Would the U.S. let itself have its constitution written in Venezuela, a country that has been additionally destroyed from within thanks to the back-up of a U.S. (led and financed) color revolution? Remember the 1992 uprising in Serbia? OTPOR was backed up by NGO’s (National Endowment for ‘Democracy’?) by the tune of millions? Wasn’t it the same logo that was found roughly 11 years later in the street of Cairo? A coincidence? I let you be the judge:

Clipboard_Image 009

OTPUR/Serbia: US backed-up Color Revolution | Cairo: US backed-up Color Revolution

More (Obama/Merkel) propaganda: “And he [Obama] also recalled the devastating consequences of ‘intolerance and extreme nationalism’ that drenched Europe in blood during the 20th century. ‘In the last century, just twice in 30 years, the forces of empire and intolerance and extreme nationalism consumed this continent and cities like this one were largely reduced to rubble, Obama said. When I read those lines, it reminds me of 70’s Soviet Union communist propaganda. Our “On tour” Obama neo-con must obviously promote that Britain remains in the fascist EU alliance: What else? Much easier to control: A single phone call to Jean-Claude Juncker!

Geert Wilders (Partij voor de Vrijheid – PVV, NL), Nigel Farage (British UKIP) or Marine Le Pen (French Front National) or German AFD (Alternative für Deutschland) are just a few popular voices coming from the people who are fed up with the fascist financial lords that have overtaken both sides of the Atlantic.

The danger in Europe and the U.S. is not Russia but our own brand of politician traitors such as Kanzler Angela Merkel, Barack Obama, Jean Claude Juncker, Martin Schulz, François Hollande and David Cameron:  these are the neo con fascists who are endangering the peace on our European Continent. Would Vladimir Putin behave the same way Berlin, Brussels and Washington do, we could be now in a full-fledged WWIII military conflict!

Bruno P. Gebarski

Leave a comment

Filed under Academi, AIIB, Angela Merkel, Blackwater, BRICS, Central Banking, China, Color Revolution, Coup d'état, Fascism, France, Geopolitics, Germany, Libya, Middle East, Migrant, NED, Neo Con, New Development Bank, NGO, Renminbi, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Russia, SCO, SGE, USA, USD, WWI, WWII, WWIII, Yuan