U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchs and Neocons’ Feudalistic Power Grab (Part Six)

“There is a special breed of international financiers whose success typically is built upon certain character traits. Those include cold objectivity, immunity to patriotism, and indifference to the human condition. That profile is the basis for proposing a theoretical strategy, called the Rothschild Formula, which motivates such men to propel governments into war for the profits they yield… As long as the mechanism of central banking exists, it will be to such men an irresistible temptation to convert debt into perpetual war and war into perpetual debt.”        

  —G. Edward Griffin | Author of “The Creature from Jekyll Island“

“People, governments and economies of all nations must serve the needs of multinational banks and corporations.” 

—Zbigniew Brzezinski | Author of “The Grand Chessboard”

Geopoliticalnews suggests a review of Part One, Part Two, Part Three of our series on “U.S. exceptionalism and its global terror management.” This alleged 21^st century U.S. exceptionalism, Part Four and Part Five, doctrine is perfectly sustained by a the resurgence of virulent brand of neocon propaganda spewed by major U.S. newspapers with its goons and stooges: Part Four and Part Five.

We saw how this swaggering super-arrogant superpower, cowboys-on-steroids, imperialist U.S.A. continues to spread its “gospel of democracy”, mostly with coup d’états and wars (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Ukraine, to name just a few) and defend its fiat currency: USD, EUR, GBP and YEN system against the rising alternative offered by the BRICS, China’s SCO, AIIB, the new Shanghai Gold Exchange, the Financial Future Exchange (CFFEX), the CIPS, and the (Chinese) Renminbi, which entered the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on October 1^st of 2016. We reviewed the neocon financial tools: Quantitative Easing (QE) “to infinity” and derivative products such as Credit Default Swaps (CDS) as a way of kicking the financial can down the road and saw how ECB, FED, BOE and BOJ Central Banks destroy capital for the sake of bailing out the too-big-to-jail financial institutions.

As Dr. Stephen J. Sniegoski writes in: Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel: “It was only the traumatic effects of the 9/11 terrorism that enabled the agenda of the neocons to become the policy of the United States of America.”

Where is the judicial foundation of all those U.S.-wars and coup d’états? Was the U.S., Britain or France threatened by Libya? What’s the heck were France (with its French President neocon Sarkozy) and Britain doing bombing Libya? Why were France and Britain meddling in Africa’s richest country and attacking its sovereignty instead of minding their own business and rebuilding their crumbling road-infrastructure or reducing their astronomic public debts, both in excess of two billion Euro?

What is Germany doing bombing Syria with the US-Allies and supporting the Empire of Chaos’ neocon imperialistic agenda instead of protecting the sovereignty of its own German territory? Where is the balance between the executive, legislative and judicial branches with its system of checks and balances? How could Angela Merkel have overstepped the judicial raison d’être of the German constitution to open Germany’s borders on September the 4^th of 2015? Did Merkel consult with her government? Did Merkel democratically ask the German People?

How about the 9/11 hijacking of the U.S. Democracy? Shouldn’t have the legislative branch of the U.S government, represented by Congress, the House of Representatives and the Senate, been active? How come the U.S. Congress did not impeach the Bushes, Clinton’s and alleged Kenyan Squatter in Chief himself for drug trafficking and/or war crimes? Could not these be the signs of a resurging “democratic totalitarianism” just about to transform itself into outright fascism? Are we becoming a dystopian society?  Remember Henry Gouroux’s observation on oligarchy aka plutocracy and kleptocracy? 

The western world has being taken captive by oligarchs, plutocrats and kleptocrats represented by key cartel groups ruling the world of finances and business: We could call them the profiteering beneficiaries who can be easily classified in seven different industrial cartels: Finance, Media, Energy, Military, Pharmacy, Chemy and food:

1. Finance cartel

• World Bank | USA
  
• International Monetary Fund (IMF) | USA
• The Institute for the Works of Religion | Vatican Bank | Italy
  
• Bank of International  Settlements (BIS) | Switzerland
  
• Private Federal Reserve Bank (FED) | USA
  
• Bank of England (BOE) | Britain
  
• European Central Bank (ECB) | Germany
  
• Bank of Japan (BOJ) | Japan
  
• JP Morgan Chase & Co. | USA
  
• Goldman Sachs | USA
  
• Citigroup Inc | USA
  
• Wells Fargo & Co. | USA
  
• Bank of America | USA
  
• BNP Paribas | France
  
• Deutsche Bank | Germany
  

2. Media cartel

• Google | USA | USD 74.64 billion
• Walt Disney | USA | USD 52.46 billion
• Comcast | USA | USD 75.51 billion
• 21^st Century Fox | USA | USD 28.99 billion
• Facebook | USA | USD 17.93 billion
• Bertelsmann | Germany | USD 17.14 billion
• Viacom | USA | USD 13.27 billion
• CBS | USA | USD 13.89 billion
• Baidu | China | USD 66.4 billion
• News Corp | USA | USD 33.7 billion

3. Energy cartel: “Seven Sisters” which became the Super Majors

• BP British Petroleum | United Kingdom (merged with Amoco in 1998)
• Eni SpA | Italy
• Total SA  | France
• Chevron | USA (merged with Texaco in 2000)
• ExxonMobil | USA (merged with Mobile in 1999)
• Royal Dutch Shell | Netherlands

4. Military cartel:

• Lockheed Martin | USA
• Boeing | USA
• BAE Systems | UK
• Raytheon | USA
• General Dynamics | USA
• Northrop Grumman | USA
• Airbus Group | FRA & GER | EU

5. Pharmacy cartel

• Johnson & Johnson | USA | ÚSD 70.07 billion
• Novartix | Switzerland | USD 49.4 billion
• Roche | Switzerland| CHF 48.14 billion
• Pfizer | USA | USD 48.85 billion
• Sanofi | France | EUR 37.05 billion
• Merck Group | Germany | EUR 11.36 billion
• Glaxo Smith Kline; GSK | Britain | GBP 23.92 billion  

6. Chemy cartel

• BASF | Germany | USD 78.70 billion
• Dow Chemical | USA | USD 58.2 billion
• Sinopec | China | USD 58 billion
• SABIC | Saudi Arabia | USD 43.3 billion
• Exxon Mobil | USA | USD 38.2 billion
• Formosa Plastics | Taiwan | USD 37.1 billion
• Lyondell Basell Industries | USA | USD 34.8 billion
• DuPont| USA | USD 29.9 billion
• Ineos | Switzerland | USD 54 billion
• Bayer | Germany | USD 28.1 billion

7. Food cartel

• Nestlé | Switzerland | CHF 88.8 billion
• Pepsi Co. | USA | USD 63.06 billion
• Unilever | Britain and Netherlands | EUR 53.27 billion
• Coca Cola | USA | USD 44.29 billion
• Mars | USA | USD 33 billion
• Mondelēz | USA | USD 29.6 billion
• Danone | France | EUR 22.41 billion
• General Mills | USA | USD 16.6 billion
• Kellogg’s | USA| USD 14.8 billion
• Associated British Foods | Britain | GBP 12.8 billion

Bruno Gebarski

U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part Two)

Polish-American political scientist and geostrategist Zbigniew Brzezinski and his monumental geopolitical work: “The Grand Chessboard”, is a must read if we want to better understand 21^st century U.S. Hegemon Unipolar World priorities. (Former) Imperialist Atlantic Europe (Portugal, Spain, France, Belgium, The Netherlands and Britain) did rule Europe and the world up to the 1870’s until Continental Europe: Italy (grandiose contributor to modern banking system and the Renaissance) and Germany  “showed up”most likely  feeling left out and wanting a piece of the geopolitical pie. In 1879, Germany and Austria-Hungary formed what is known as the Dual Alliance which became the Triple Alliance with the addition of Italy in 1882. In the late second half of the 19^th century and beginning of the 20th century (1880 — 1910), the German Empire was to become an economic powerhouse: Its economy rivaled and surpassed imperialistic Britain and France:

“The speed of Germany’s advance to industrial maturity after 1890 was breathtaking. The years from 1895 to 1907 witnessed a doubling of the number of workers engaged in machine building, from slightly more than one-half million to well over a million. An immediate consequence of expanding industrial employment was a sharp drop in emigration; from an average of 130,000 people per year in the 1880s, the outflow dropped to 20,000 per year in the mid-1890s. The surplus population continued to leave Prussia’s eastern provinces, but the destination was the growing and multiplying factories of Berlin and the Ruhr rather than the Americas. Earlier British fears of German competition were now fully justified. While Britain produced about twice as much steel as Germany during the early 1870s, Germany’s steel production exceeded Britain’s in 1893, and by 1914 Germany was producing more than twice as much steel as Britain. Moreover, only one-third of German exports in 1873 were finished goods; the portion rose to 63 percent by 1913. Germany came to dominate all the major Continental markets except France.”(Source: Encyclopedia Britannica)

Due to its unbalance of trade payments towards Germany, Britain got so worried about losing its gold (The British Pound was then backed up by gold) that in 1887, it issued the “Made in Germany” Merchandise Marks Act intended at degrading German products as shoddy compared to the renowned “British manufacturing standards” (sic). Obviously the unintended consequence is the fact that “Made in Germany” became, and remains to this very day, a worldwide seal of first class workmanship and quality. Where is the French, British or U.S. equivalent to Audi, Mercedes Benz, Porsche, Volkswagen, BMW (Bayerische Motor Werke) fine German automobiles? Was this one of the reasons why the Washington neocons have lassoed Volkswagen, for a while the first automobile manufacturer in the world, with a 15 billion USD fine and 3.000 of their cars were blown up in the Tianjin catastrophe?

At the turn of the 20^th Century, the German Empire (with Austria, Hungary and Italy) had already become a Post-Industrial Revolution threat to Britain and France unchallenged Imperialists powers. I would like to  suggest that this could have been one of the core reasons why France and Britain needed Germany’s destruction (WWI) “once and for all” as stated by the great Sir Winston Churchill:

“You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest.”

Shortly after the newly (1913) created Private Federal Reserve, thanks to corrupt U.S. President Woodrow Wilson’s acquiescence, much evidence shows that taking down “German strength” could have very well been on the allies’ agenda:

1. Germany’s industrial power and the talent of its people
2. Germany not borrowing money from the central banks of England (BoE) or Federal Reserve

What followed Germany’s 1918 defeat was the 11th of November 1919 humiliating Treaty of Versailles inflicted by Imperialists France and Britain (with the help of the U.S.) The combination of Germany’s WWI defeat and the Versailles dictate had just crushed a superb industrial nation by demanding an additional gold ransom (lost between 1871 and 1914 due to France and Britain’s trade unbalance) of 132 billion (gold) mark. 

“You see, the real value of a conflict, the true value is in the debt that it creates. You control the debt – you control everything. You find this upsetting, yes? But this is the very essence of the banking industry, to make us all – whether we [are] nations or individuals, slaves to debt.”

—Umberto Calvini, from the motion picture: The International (starring Clive Owen as Louis Sallinger and Naomi Watts as Eleanor Whitman.)

After re-entering the geopolitical chessboard in 1871, Germany’s post WWII-partition, into West-Germany or Western Federal Republic of Germany (FRG), and East Germany or German Democratic Republic (GDR), gave the birth to a bipolar world dominated by the United States of America (USA) and the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR | CCCP: Сою́з Сове́тских Социалисти́ческих Респу́блик). After the fall of the Soviet Union in December 1991, we returned to a Unipolar world dominated by the United States of America but increasingly challenged by the BRICS nations led by the Double Helix Russia and China.

How is the U.S. profiling and securing its geopolitical, financial and industrial hegemony? What are the main geopolitical “building sites” the United States of America is trying to control and secure right now? We shall begin addressing some of these topics:

• Controlling the Balkan via NATO-Kosovo territories (Camp Bondsteel)
• Ukraine:  a fascist coup d’état led by the U.S. and EU
• Syrian conflict and U.S. gas and crude oil control
• Qatar vs. Iran: The Sunni—Shiite gas dilemma
• Destabilization of the Eurasian Balkan

Bruno Gebarski

Additional Reading:

• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part One)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part Two)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | September 11th 2001 and the Rise of U.S. Neocons (Part Three)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Preemptive Strike & Neocons Mainstream Media Propaganda (Part Four)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchy and Neocons Destructive Agenda (Part Five)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchy and Neocons Destructive Agenda (Part Six: coming soon)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | U.S.-NATO Serbian Genocide (Part Seven: planned)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Iraq the War for Oil and Control of the Middle East (Part Eight: planned)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Iraq the War for OIL and Control of the Middle East (Part Nine: planned)

 

U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part One)

“Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.” —Sun Tzu, Chinese general, military strategist and philosopher | 544–496 BC

What has happened to U.S. Exceptionalism? Does it still exist? Is 21st Century USA still “The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave?”

“In its classic forms, American Exceptionalism refers to the special character of the United States as a uniquely free nation based on democratic ideals and personal liberty. Sometimes this special character is inferred from the nature of American political institutions founded in the 1776-89 period–the declaration of independence (1776), revolution (1776-83), constitution (1787).” —Ian Tyrrell

Since the December 1991 fall of the Soviet Union (USSR), we have been leaving in a Unipolar World dominated by a resurging Anglo-American Neo-Conservative leadership: One of the many Khazarian Mafia’s extensions assisted by its own private banking center headquartered in the Financial District of the City of London. Looking into history, one could trace the roots of the most nefarious KM: Khazarian Mafia‘s aspiration all the way back to the Babylonian Empire and its pagan worship that has come down in all sorts of secret societies: Freemasonry, Skull and Bones, Illuminati, The Bohemian Grove’s “Cremation of Care ritual“, held every July in the Redwood Forest outside of San Francisco, California USA, in a 2.700-acre (10.92 km²) privately owned summer camp: Part 1 and Part 2.

One could equate September 11. 2001 to the termination of U.S. democracy as established by the Founding Fathers of the United States of America with its Fourth of July 1776 Declaration of Independence: Thanks to an egregious synthetic terrorist neocon coup d’état on its own American Citizenry.

Since 911, Washington’s worldwide neo conservative destabilization mission is ongoing. “Exceptionalistan” as shrewdly coined by international Brazilian geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar or the “Empire of Chaos” to-do-list is endless: Kosovo, Afghanistan (FBI cocaine trafficking via Incirlik Turkey and Ramstein Germany NATO airbases), Iraq, Egypt, Iran, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Macedonia, Georgia, Russia, Venezuela, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Kyrgyzstan part of the soon to be destabilized Eurasian Balkan. In the name of U.S. Unipolar World hegemony: “Color revolutions would never be enough; [US] Exceptionalistan is always on the lookout for major strategic upgrades capable of ensuring perpetual Empire of Chaos hegemony,” Pepe Escobar goes on to say.

However, this Anglo-American financial Unipolar World, as we’ve known it since post-WWII 1944 Bretton Woods Conference, is under threat.

BRICS, SCO, AIIB, China’s New Shanghai Gold Exchange, China Financial Future Exchange (CFFEX) and CIPS are all menacing the Anglo-American fiat money USD hegemony (including GBP, EUR and YEN) re-established in 1971, when President Richard Nixon, following General de Gaulle demanding French gold back from the Federal Reserve, unilaterally ended the convertibility of US Dollars to Gold.

Washington’s neocon headquarters have since transformed the United States of America into the world’s largest Terror State, a country which is using God’s blessings promised to Abraham to attack innocent nations (Libya, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Syria to name just a few) on behalf of its Khazarian Neocon Mafia with/via the deployment of synthetic terror, creating new enemies who then must be attacked by the “official” U.S. Pentagon army. All this is being done to allegedly “stop terrorism” and bring “freedom and democracy” to the Middle East and Africa: pure neocon “national socialist” propaganda that reminds us of Third Reich National Sozialismus’ (Nazi). In other words, Neo Conservatism (neocon) is a political euphemistic jargon synonym of Third Reich’s “National Sozialismus” or in English: National Socialism.

For the sake of maintaining its fiat financial USD Unipolar Leadership Status, “Exceptionalistan” is ready to implement whatever nefarious methodology is necessary: Even if terror has to be applied on its own citizenry and snuff out three thousands human lives like it did on September 11^th of 2001. A fictitious “terrorist” enemy had just been created out of nothing. After the birth of this new breed of synthetic terrorism, destabilization of whatever country that dared to threaten U.S. and Western geopolitical and geo-financial interests would follow:

• Iraq: as Sadam Hussein announced in 2000 that Iraqi oil would be traded in EUR instead of USD
• Libya: as Gaddafi planned to introduce a gold Dinar and thus had to be removed

Initiative such as the BRICS’ and Russia’s De-Dollarization of the world economy is dangerous and taken by the Anglo-American neocons very seriously. As Gerald Celente at Trendsresearch says: “Do you think we [The USA] would be in Iraq if its major export was broccoli?”

Among others, the neo-cons’ methodologies include:

• Deployment of synthetic terror: New York, September 11. 2001 | Madrid, March 11. 2004 | London July 7. 2005 | Paris November 13. 2015 | Nice 14. July 2016 | Munich July 23. 2016
• Manufactured wars (Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine)
• US-Pentagon “official” army fighting CIA narcotic financed Langley mercenaries (ISIS, ISIL, IS, Al Qaeda, Daesh, Al Nusra, Al Nustra, The Islamic State)
• Color revolutions (Egypt 2008 “Arab Spring” thanks to newly 2006 created social media technology via Twitter propaganda
• NGOs such as Freedom House innocuously founded in 1941 by Eleanor Roosevelt
• Weapons of Mass Migration: Germany and Austria being hit the hardest since September 4^th 2015
• Dīvide et īmpera: “divide and conquer” strategy creating ongoing chaos

Western citizenry is to the most part oblivious to what is happening. Main Stream Mass Media Propaganda is crucial in upholding the Western ignorance of a compliant and acquiescent sheeple who has been taken captive by a neocon “liberalism” aimed at enslaving its citizens and destroying the God-ordained family structure, which remains the foundation of a functioning and healthy society.

• Mind-control (via Mass Media Propaganda, Smartphones, Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR)
• Social Media Propaganda (Facebook and Twitter)
• Induced drug addiction slavery
• QE: Quantitative Easing “to infinity”
• Debt slavery:

• Destruction of water supply via fracking shale oil industry: Fueling half of U.S. oil output
• Destruction of natural God ordained living seeds via genetically modified organisms (Monsanto‘s GMO’s)
• Murdering of innocent unborn babies via abortion: 58,5 million children lives sacrificed to the 21^st century molech god of materialism
• “Planned Parenthood” murdering of babies and selling of “fresh” aborted baby eyes, hearts and “gonads”
• Heating of UK hospitals with aborted babies incineration
• Removing of God’s 10 commandments from our schools and public places

The Washington rogue régime has turned the table of good and evil upside down: We only have the Word of God left to properly qualify or summarize the level of nefariousness these fascist neocons are inflicting upon their victims. Christof Hörstel from newly created Deutsche Mitte (German Middle) qualifies it as “The Global Chaos Management of the U.S. Government.”

Let’s conclude the indictment of this present nefarious ruling “establishment” and take heed to the wise Words of Almighty God via His (Minor) Prophet Habakkuk:

• Hab 2:6  Shall not all these take up a parable against him, and a taunting proverb against him, and say, Woe to him that increaseth that which is not his! how long? and to him that ladeth himself with thick clay!
• Hab 2:7  Shall they not rise up suddenly that shall bite thee, and awake that shall vex thee, and thou shalt be for booties unto them?
• Hab 2:8  Because thou hast spoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall spoil thee; because of men’s blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein. (KJV: King James Version of the Bible)  

Bruno Gebarski

Additional Reading:

• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part One)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part Two)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | September 11th 2001 and the Rise of U.S. Neocons (Part Three)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Preemptive Strike & Neocons Mainstream Media Propaganda (Part Four)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchy and Neocons Destructive Agenda (Part Five)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchy and Neocons Destructive Agenda (Part Six: coming soon)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | U.S.-NATO Serbian Genocide (Part Seven: planned)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Iraq the War for Oil and Control of the Middle East (Part Eight: planned)
• U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Iraq the War for OIL and Control of the Middle East (Part Nine: planned)

Ukraine 22nd and 23rd of February 2014 U.S. Coup d’État | Viktor A. Yushchenko | Viktor F. Yanukovych | EU & U.S. NeoCons: Petro O. Poroshenko

To this day the bulk of German citizenry, spoon fed by German western propagandists such as Der Spiegel, Focus, Bild, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Die Welt and Süd Deutsche Zeitung, to name just a few, believes that Russian President Vladimir Putin is responsible for the Ukraine conflict. U.S. CIA fueled German drumbeat propaganda is loud and clear: As former (German) mainstream media journalist and whistle blower Udo Ulfkotte once said: “You either publish what is ‘expected of you’ or you’re pronto out of a job!” Welcome to (German) 21^st century western neocon journalism and this, mind you, on both sides of the pond!

A few golden nuggets preceding this Western Ukrainian Eurasian coup d’état ought to be reviewed. Here are some of the events that led to the climax of this well orchestrated western geopolitical fascist masquerade!

In his article:  “CIA: Undermining and Nazifying Ukraine Since 1953,” Wayne Madsen writes: “The recent declassification of over 3800 documents by the Central Intelligence Agency provides detailed proof that since 1953 the CIA operated two major programs intent on not only destabilizing Ukraine but Nazifying it with followers of the World War II Ukrainian Nazi leader Stepan Bandera.  The CIA programs spanned some four decades. Starting as a paramilitary operation that provided funding and equipment for such anti-Soviet Ukrainian resistance groups as the Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council (UHVR); its affiliates, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), all Nazi Banderists. The CIA also provided support to a relatively anti-Bandera faction of the UHVR, the ZP-UHVR, a foreign-based virtual branch of the CIA and British MI-6 intelligence services. The early CIA operation to destabilize Ukraine, using exile Ukrainian agents in the West who were infiltrated into Soviet Ukraine, was codenamed Project Aerodynamic.

Ukraine’s dramatic November and December 2004 Orange Revolution

Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko

Six months after the November December 2004 Orange Revolution, led by Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych, the Ukraine, and its Western-leaning president Viktor Andriyovych Yushchenko and charismatic Prime Minister Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko, who later ended up in jail for corruption, was on a firm Western-oriented course! Reforms however remained slow. While Viktor A. Yushchenko was celebrated as a hero, his leadership started drawing disapproval. The Kyiv Post was then urging its readers to “resist Orange depression.”

 

“In December 2004 US Congressman Ron Paul of Texas, a libertarian Republican and critic of the Iraq War, echoed President George W Bush’s words that ‘Any election (in Ukraine), if there is one, ought to be free from any foreign influence.’ He continued, ‘I agree with the president wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, it seems that several U.S. government agencies saw things differently and sent U.S. taxpayer dollars into Ukraine in an attempt to influence the outcome’” (Ron Paul 2004).

In late august 2006, President Viktor Andriyovych Yushchenko was forced to appoint Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych as prime minister after his own allies, including Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko failed to form a government. Interesting to notice that both Viktor A. Yushchenko and Yulia V. Tymoshenko accused each other of corruption!  Finally on the 7th of February 2010, Viktor F. Yanukovych, leader of the Region’s Party, won the Ukrainian presidential election with 48,95%, against 45,47% of the votes for Yulia V. Tymoshenko.

On the 22^nd and 23^rd of February 2014 and under the leadership and the baton of U.S. American neo con “diplomats:” Victoria Nuland and Jeffrey Pyatt, the Ukrainian Verkhovna Rada staged a coup d’état on its Ukrainian people: The Ukrainian parliament forced its president Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych to resign and replaced him with the former boss of its secret services Oleksandr Turchynov. The Ukrainian constitution that used to be parliamentary was repealed and transformed into a presidential type of régime similar to the United States of America: What a coincidence!

 

Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko

Democratically elected President Viktor F. Yanukovych was impeached and removed from office. Former Prime Minister and billionaire Yulia V. Tymoshenko (undergoing a seven-year prison sentence) was released and Oleksandr Valentynovych Turchynov was proclaimed acting (sic) president. The whole neo colonialism western bloody power grab (coup d’état) was then celebrated by Western Powers and its media propaganda stooges, under the control of the CIA dutifully filtering (pun intended) and spewing distorted information to its gullible smartphones hypnotized, sodomized, drugged up, decadent and morally lawless western zombie citizens, as a “return to democracy” (sic). Finally, on Mai the 25^th of 2014, Ukrainian corrupt chocolate magnate and oligarch Petro Oleksiyovych Poroshenko was “elected” President of the Ukraine! But it is all the fault of Russian “war mongering” Vladimir Putin right?

Orange Revolution 2.0

Memorable U.S. Assistant Secretary of State to Secretary of State John Kerry Victoria Nuland is your typical American bubblegum-chewing mafia doll! Some sort of a neo-colonialist reincarnated neo-con cow-girl riding high the tsunami waves of U.S. and NATO’s Eurasian expansion! In a public speech, our Washington’s cloned female warmonger made the following fascist hypocritical and propagandist NATO statement: “Since the declaration of Ukrainian independence in 1991, the United States supported the Ukrainians in the development of democratic institutions and skills in promoting civil society and a good form of government – all that is necessary to achieve the objectives of Ukraine’s European. We have invested more than 5 billion dollars to help Ukraine to achieve these and other goals. ” Victoria Nuland added: “The United States will continue to promote Ukraine to the future it deserves.”

Neo-Nazi Svoboda’s reelected leader: Oleh Tyahnybok

In his article: “There are No Neo-Nazis in Ukraine. And the Obama Administration does not support Fascists,” Prof Michel Chossudovsky’s writes: Svoboda is a Neo-Nazi Party, Ukraine’s fourth biggest party holding 36 seats out of 450 in parliament. They’re also part of the Alliance of European National Movements along with the BNP and Jobbik. Svoboda is supported directly by Washington.  This is Svoboda and the “Right Sector”: the Neo-Nazi group which led the “protest movement” in Ukraine. These Neo-Nazis are armed gunmen.”

Just in case you missed it, here is Princess Nuland’s encore: An oratorio of suave vocabulary finesse and rhetorical skills caught in a “Nulandgate-style” statement she made during a phone conversation with U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Jeffrey Pyatt (02:32):

• Nuland: “OK… one more wrinkle for you Geoff. I can’t remember if I told you this, or if I only told Washington this, that when I talked to Jeff Feltman [United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs] this morning, he had a new name for the UN guy Robert Serry did I write you that this morning?”
• Pyatt: “Yeah I saw that.”
• Nuland: “OK. He’s now gotten both [Robert] Serry and [UN Secretary General] Ban Ki-moon to agree that [Robert] Serry could come in Monday or Tuesday. So that would be great, I think, to help glue this thing and to have the UN help glue it and, you know, f**k the EU (02:32).”

“Meet the new (cold) war,” wrote Pepe Escobar in his editorial: The New US-Russia Cold War:  ”. . . Same as the old (cold) war. Same, but different. One day, it’s the myriad implications of Washington’s ‘pivoting’ to Asia – as in the containment of China. The next day, it’s the perennial attempt to box Russia in. Never a dull moment in the New Great Game in Eurasia.” Escobar thinks that “’F**k the EU’ is essentially directed towards Berlin and Klitschko, its key protégé. Washington sees this going nowhere, as Germany, after all, has been slowly building a complex energy-investment partnership with Russia.”

Private Blackwater/Academi mercenaries to the Neo Nazi U.S. rescue

An alleged report by Jeremy Scahill (Investigating journalist and author of Blackwater) revealed that the largest mercenary army in the world, Blackwater (later called Xe Services and more recently “Academi”) clandestine intelligence services was sold to the multinational Monsanto. Blackwater was renamed in 2009 after becoming famous in the world with numerous reports of abuses in Iraq, including massacres of civilians. It remains the largest private contractor of the U.S. Department of State “security services,” that practices state terrorism by giving the government the opportunity to deny it.

About 400 elite mercenaries from the notorious US private security firm Academi (formerly Blackwater) were taking part in the Ukrainian military operation against anti-government protesters in southeastern regions of the country, German media reported. Der Bild am Sonntag (The Photo on Sunday) newspaper, citing a source in intelligence circles, wrote that Academi employees were involved in the Kiev military crackdown on pro-autonomy activists in the  Donetsk region. German Intelligence Service (BND: Bundesnachrichtendienst)  informed Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government about the mercenaries’ participation in the operation, the paper said, RIA Novosti reported.

Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet during a telephone conversation with Catherine Ashton Foreign Affairs and Security Policy discuss Ukraine over the phone and Umas Paet reporting the snipers shooting on both sides policemen and people on the street. Again this is strong evidence of the internal meddling by the United States, European Union and NATO into the sovereign affairs of the Ukraine.

2014 March the 10^th:  A 33 tons U.S. gold heist

http://iskra-news.info/news/segodnja_nochju_iz_borispolja_v_ssha_strarto…

At 2 a.m. this morning an unmarked transport plane was on the runway at Borispol Airport. According to airport staff, before the plane came to the airport, four trucks and two Volkswagen minibuses arrived, all the truck license plates missing. Fifteen people in black uniforms, masks, and body armor stepped out, some armed with machine guns. They loaded the plane with more than 40 heavy boxes. After that a mysterious men arrived and entered the plane. All loading was done in a hurry. The plane took off on an emergency basis. Those who saw this mysterious special operation immediately notified the airport officials, who told the callers not to meddle in other people’s affairs.  Later a returned call from a senior official of the former Ministry of Income and Fees reported that tonight, on the orders of one of the new leaders of Ukraine, the United States had taken custody of all the gold reserves in Ukraine.

But as Chris Powell, Secretary and Treasurer of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc. writes:

“The first rule of mainstream financial journalism and particularly financial journalism about gold is never to put a specific critical question about the monetary metal to any of the primary participants in the gold market, central banks. That is, nearly all gold market reporting is, by design, irrelevant distraction at best, disinformation at worst.”

 “The true location and disposition of national gold reserves are secrets far more sensitive than the location and disposition of nuclear weapons.”

Maybe the gold looted by the U.S. will reimburse some of the costs neocon Victoria Nuland and her Ukrainian stooges have made in the first place! A western coup d’état that is aimed at separating Europe but particularly Germany from its main eastern trade partner Russia but also indirectly China.

Bruno P. Gebarski

 

China is Preparing the Gold Alternative to the U.S. Dollar-System

This article is an English translation of Frederick William Engdahl‘s article which first appeared on the Kopp Verlag blog under the German title: China bereitet Goldalternative zum Dollar-System-vor.

Current Chairman of the G20 group of nations China has invited France, among others, to organize a special conference in Paris. The fact that such a conference has taken place in an OECD country, is an indication of how weak the supremacy of the U.S.-dominated Dollar-system has already become.

On the 31 of March 2016, a special meeting with the name “Nanjing II” took place in Paris. In attendance was the Governor of the Central Bank of China, Zhou Xiaochuan. He gave a detailed presentation about the broader use of SDR or Special Drawing Rights of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), a basket of five major world currencies.

Only a very few priviledged guests were invited. These included German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, the British Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne and the IMF chief Christine Lagarde. They discussed with China the world financial architecture. What was striking and significant is the fact that not a single high-ranking US official participated.

Bloomberg reported about the Paris talks: “China aims to achieve a much stricter management system, in which private sector decisions are to be made by governments” said Edwin Truman, a former official of the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury. “The French have always advocated an international monetary reform. Consequently they are china’s first choice ally.”

A China Youth Daily (China Youth) newspaper journalist, who was also in Paris said: “Zhou Xiaochuan pointed out that the international monetary and financial system, presently undergoing a structural adjustment, will cause many challenges for the world economy” . . . According Journalist Zhou, “China’s goal, as the current chairman of the G20 talks, is to promote a much wider use of the SDR.”

 Source: imf.org

For most of us this sounds as exciting as watching grass grow in the prairies. But behind this seemingly insignificant technical request, the overarching Chinese strategy turns out to be more and more the removal of the U.S. Dollar from its dominant role as a reserve currency of the world’s central banks.

China and others want to put an end to the tyranny of the bankrupt U.S. Dollar-system. This system has made it possible to finance countless wars with funds borrowed from other countries that have never been paid back. The strategy boils down to end the dominance of the U.S. Dollar as the currency for most of the world traded goods and services: This is no small matter!

Despite the U.S. economy being a wreck and Washington’s astronomical national debt of 19 trillion U.S. Dollars, up to 64 percent of all central bank reserves are still held in U.S. Dollars. The largest holder of U.S. Dollar debt is China, followed closely by Japan. As long as the U.S. Dollar is the “reserve currency”, Washington can accumulate endless deficits, knowing that countries like China have no serious alternative but to invest their foreign exchange profits into U.S. government bonds or government-guaranteed loans.

As I often pointed out, this in fact means that “China is de facto financing the Washington military campaigns,” which is in complete contradiction with Chinese or Russian interests, “as well as the numerous U.S. State Department color revolutions from Tibet to Hong Kong, Libya to the Ukraine or IS [ISIS, ISIL, Al Qaeda] in the Middle East,” and the list goes on and on…

A world made of many currencies

As we take a closer look at all the steps the Beijing government has taken since the 2008 global financial crisis – in particular the establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank [AIIB], the New Development Bank [NDB] of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), and the bilateral agreement with Russia on energy supplies settled in domestic currencies thus bypassing the U.S. Dollar – it becomes clear that Zhou and Beijing’s leadership are pursuing a long-term strategy.

As British economist David Marsh pointed out regarding Zhou’s comments at the recent Nanjing II meeting in Paris, “China is pragmatically and steadily establishing a backup system of many currencies in the heart of the international world order.”

Since China’s currency was added to the selected group of SDR currencies last November, there is the system of multiple currencies, which China calls the “4 + 1 system.” It includes not only the U.S. Dollar (fhe first) the Euro, the Pound Sterling, the [Japanese] Yen but also the Renminbi [also known as Yuan] (the fourth). These are the five SDR components.

In order to strengthen the recognition of the SDR, the Central Bank of China has begun to publish its total foreign exchange reserves – the world’s largest – in both SDR and in U.S. Dollar.

A golden future

However, the Chinese alternative to the dominance of the U.S. Dollar goes much further than the propagation of the paper currencies of the SDR basket. China is obviously aiming at restoring an international gold standard. Most likely it won’t be based on the bankrupt Bretton Woods dollar exchange system, U.S. President Richard Nixon unilaterally terminated in August 1971, when he told the world, that in the future, they would have to swallow the paper Dollar and would not be able to redeem gold with it. At that particular juncture a global inflation — in U.S. Dollar — kicked in, an inflation, that future economic historians will most likely remember as “the greatest inflation ever.”

One estimates that between 1970 and 2000 the global U.S. Dollar circulation rose by more than 2.500 percent. Since then it has expended to well over 3.000 percent: and this, without any legal requirement to secure this U.S. Dollar amount in a predetermined ratio to gold, thus cancelling any worldwide U.S. Dollar inflation restriction. As long as the world is forced to have U.S. Dollars to pay for oil, grain and other goods, Washington can write checks endlessly without any fear of having them burst because of “insufficient cover.”

In conjuction with the fact that since 1971 another silent Wall Street Bank coup d’état has taken place, claiming any hint of representative democracy and constitutional government for itself, we have the craziest money printing machine very similar to Goethe’s 18^th century poem: the Sorcerer’s apprentice. The fiat creation of U.S. Dollars has literally run out of control!

Since 2015, China is striving to replace the London, New York and Western Financial hubs responsible for gold fixing rates. As I reported in my longer August 2015 analysis, China and Russia are making great progress, to back up their currencies with gold in order “to make them as good as gold”, while currencies such as the debt ridden Euro or the bankrupt and credit inundated U.S. Dollar are struggling for survival.

In May 2015, China announced that it had established a state owned gold mutual  / investment fund. The initial goal is to create a pool of 16 billion U.S. Dollars and convert it into the largest physical gold-fund in the world. China is also developing a gold mine project along the new high-speed rail lines that have been called the “New Economic Silk Road” or “a road or a belt,” President Xi promotes.

According to China, the goal should be to enable Eurasian countries, along the Silk Road, to raise the backing of their local currencies with gold. Countries along the Silk Road and the BRICS, having the majority of the world population, natural and human resources, would then become completely independent of anything the West has to offer.

In May 2015, China’s Gold market in Shanghai formally established the “Silk Road Gold Fund” (Silk Road Gold Fund.) The two main investors in the new fund were the two largest gold mining Chinese companies: the Shandong Gold Group with 35 percent of the shares and the Shaanxi Gold Group with 25 percent. The Fund will invest in mining projects along the railways of the Eurasian Silk Road and also in the larger not yet explored regions of the Russian Federation.

Very few know thus far that South Africa is no longer the gold king of the world. South Africa is only ranking annual gold production country number seven. China is number one and Russia number two.

On May 11, just before the founding of new China Gold Fund, China’s National Gold Group Corporation signed an agreement with the Russian gold mining group Polyus Gold, Russia’s largest operator of gold mines and one of the ten largest in the world. Both companies will tap the gold deposits at Natalka in the Far East, in the district of Kolyma the province Magadan, which is still considered the largest in Russia.

Recently, the Chinese government and its state-owned companies have shifted their strategy. Today, with the official date of March 2016, China holds more than $ 3.2 trillion of foreign currency as a reserve in its central bank. Of these – it is believed – that about 60 percent, or almost two trillion dollars are in assets such as U.S. Treasuries or quasi-government bonds, mortgage bonds of mortgage companies such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Instead of investing all their dollar revenues from trade surpluses in increasingly inflated and worthless US Treasury bonds, China has set in motion the strategy to purchase assets worldwide.

On top of the Chinese “shopping list” of Beijing’s foreign assets is the purchasing of gold mines around the world. Although the price of gold has tightened slightly since January, it still moves on a five-year low, and many mining companies, threatened by bankruptcy, are in serious need of liquidity. Gold is just about to hit the Renaissance start button.

The beauty of gold is not only the fact that countless buyers use it as a hedge against inflation but is also the most beautiful of all precious metals.

In his work The Republic, Greek philosopher Plato identified five types of forms of government – aristocracy, plutocracy, oligarchy, democracy and tyranny, tyranny which is the lowest and most scurrilous of them all. He then lists the aristocracy or the rule of the wise (philosophers’ kings) with the “golden souls” as the highest form of government, which is very kind and of the highest integrity. Throughout the history of mankind, the value of gold has always been appreciated. China, Russia and other Eurasian nations are bringing gold back to where it deserves to be and this is very good indeed.

Frederick William Engdahl

Copyright © 2016 | The copyright of this site is, unless otherwise indicated, the Kopp Verlag, Rottenburg,  Germany | Original German article: http://info.kopp-verlag.de/hintergruende/enthuellungen/f-william-engdahl/china-bereitet-goldalternative-zum-dollar-system-vor.html | Translation Bruno P. Gebarski.

Image Credit nwright | Shutterstock

This article represents exclusively the opinion of the author. It does not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher or the opinions of other authors of these sites.

 

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (Part Nine)

”Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” —Jorge Agustín Nicolás Ruiz de (George) Santayana, Spanish-born philosopher  (1863 — 1952)

“War is the continuation of politics by other means.” —Carl von Clausewitz, Prussian General (1780 — 1831)

Relying on Western Mainstream media is often connected to propaganda and geopolitical lies such as:

• 9/11 was an Al Qaeda “terror attack” on America (which in some way it was because Al Qaeda is a U.S. CIA asset in the first place!)
• Russia is alone to be blamed for the Ukrainian conflict
• Crimea “was invaded” by Vladimir Putin
• Libya was freed from Muammar al-Gaddafi for “democratic” reasons
• Egypt and its Arab Spring was the outburst of a “democratic” revolution

Many things are not what they appear to be and many historical events, we were taught at schools/universities or read about, rarely recount the truth of what happened!  Wars are (often) initiated by financial institutions and their bankster cabal!

Could this have been the case when, on June the 28^th of 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, were shot dead in Sarajevo (Serbia)? Shortly after their assassination, Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Britain, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Italy, Serbia, Russia, Turkey and the U.S. got involved in a cataclysmic chain of events that would make up for one of the bloodiest wars in European history.

How could a European conflict (and World War One) end up with Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles, often known as the War Guilt Clause, and Germany bearing alone the full moral responsibility for this (European) catastrophe?

“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.” (Treaty of Versailles, Article 231)

Australian historian and scholar Christopher Clark, author of “The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914“, makes an insightful statement: “Those who think that my book is about an acquittal of Germany’s great responsibility for the conflict are on the wrong path. This book does not set Germany free from its shared responsibility of the outbreak of this war whatsoever. It is an attempt at considering and understanding the origin of this war as a European problem. It is not striving to ‘de-Germanize’ the war but to ‘Europeanize’ it.”

“Wer meint in meinem Buch einen Freispruch für die deutsche Staatsführung damals zu erlesen ist auf dem falschen Weg. . . . Das Buch spricht die deutschen überhaupt nicht von einer starken und großen Mitverantwortung an den Ausbruch dieses Krieges frei, sondern versucht die Entstehung dieses Krieges als europäisches Problem zu verstehen und zu betrachten. Es ist ein Versuch die Geschichte dieses Krieges nicht zu ‘entdeutschen’ sondern zu europäisieren.” —Christopher Clark

Germany never initiated nor started this war in the first place: Austria-Hungary did! So, why were the Allies (France in particular) so keen at accusing and humiliating Germany when France, Britain, Russia, Serbia, Austria-Hungary and the U.S. should have also been held accountable? Why Germany?

To answer this question, we need to review the geopolitical circumstances that transformed Prussia from a fractured kingdom (post Napoleonic wars) to a united German nation. How was Germany able to accumulate so much wealth from 1850 to 1914? Germany’s industrial strength was nothing short of an “Industrial Miracle.” Despite the fact that this Industrial Revolution started 100 years later than in Britain, the Netherlands and Flemish (north) Belgium, by 1900, Germany had become Europe’s number one economy. How did it happen?

The quintessential reason for Germany’s industrial revival (1871-1900) was the establishment of a German Currency (Mark) backed by Gold! Germany’s national wealth was rapidly created because their gold backed currency was not borrowed from central banks. This is geopolitically and geofinancially crucial because both (private) Bank of England (BoE) and newly created (private) U.S. Federal Reserve (1913 in Jekyll Island) did not have “monetary control” over Germany. As a nation, Germany was free to issue interest free money. Just like Adolf Hitler did with Germany’s development of what would become the world’s finest Autobahn (highway) network, Germany’s “interest free” money speeded up the expansion of its industrial wealth.

Germany’s late nineteen century industrialization was also speeded up thanks to:

• The 1832 creation of a Zollverein (customs union) that promoted free trade between all German States
• The 1870 German defeat over France and Otto von Bismarck‘s 1871 creation of a united Germany (from its initial 25 German-speaking states, city-states and duchies) that  stimulated its industrialization even further
• The new politically united Germany could now exploit the rich iron-fields of Lorraine taken from France
• The development of a national railway network especially after 1830. By 1850 Germany had constructed half as much as Britain and twice as much as France
• The extraction of coal from the Silesian, Rhineland and Ruhr fields
• Germany becoming Europe’s leading steel-producing nation in the late 19th century
• The emergence of larger companies such as Alfred Krupp (railway, locomotives and armament production) and Werner Siemens

Incidentally, the 23^rd of August 1887 marked the birth of Made in Germany: A trademark law from the “Merchandise Marks Act” imposed by Britain on all German imported goods, which had to bear the “Made in Germany” label. Britain’s obvious intention was to downgrade German products as of “lesser quality” thus “lesser price,” which, as we know, turned out in Germany’s favo(u)r!

We are beginning to see how German currency (gold Mark) and German economy lead us again to the central banksters! London, New York and Paris did not like Germany issuing free money and feared (France especially) the threat that such an economic powerhouse could cause!  Winston Churchill, appointed First Lord of the Admiralty before the start of World War I, would eventually make this revealing tatement:

“You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism but against the economic strength of the German people, which must be smashed once and for all, regardless whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest“. —Winston Churchill

In part 10 of this series, we shall see how French Premier Minister Georges Clémenceau was instrumental into forging the disastrous Treaty of Versailles that would eventually “humiliate” and “flatten” Germany not only economically but also as a nation.

 Bruno P. Gebarski

Further reading:

• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (Part 9)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (Part 7)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)