Tag Archives: Refugees

Guest Article: “Trump’s Anti-Interventionism – Neocons Hate It As Anti-War Left Comes Around”

Original Link: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-22/trumps-anti-interventionism-neocons-hate-it-anti-war-left-comes-around

Submitted by John Walsh via LewRockwell.com,

Until recently the progressive mind has been resolutely closed and stubbornly frozen in place against all things Trump.

But cracks are appearing in the ice.  With increasing frequency over the last few months, some of the most thoughtful left and progressive figures have begun to speak favorably of aspects of Trump’s foreign policy.  Let us hear from these heretics, among them William Greider, Glen Ford, John Pilger, Jean Bricmont, Stephen F. Cohen and William Blum.  Their words are not to be construed as “endorsements,” but rather an acknowledgment of Trump’s anti-interventionist views, the impact those views are having and the alternative he poses to Hillary Clinton in the current electoral contest.

First, let’s consider the estimable William Greider, a regular contributor to The Nation and author of Secrets of the Temple.  He titled a recent article for the Nation, “Donald Trump Could be The Military Industrial Complex’s Worst Nightmare: The Republican Front Runner is Against Nation Building.  Imagine That.” 

Greider’s article is brief, and I recommend reading every precious word of it.  Here is but one quote: “Trump has, in his usual unvarnished manner, kicked open the door to an important and fundamental foreign-policy debate.”  And here is a passage from Trump’s interview with the Washington Post that Greider chooses to quote:

“‘I watched as we built schools in Iraq and they’d be blown up,’ Trump told the editors.  ‘And we’d build another one and it would get blown up. And we would rebuild it three times. And yet we can’t build a school in Brooklyn.… at what point do you say hey, we have to take care of ourselves. So, you know, I know the outer world exists and I’ll be very cognizant of that but at the same time, our country is disintegrating, large sections of it, especially in the inner cities.'”

Trump talks about building infrastructure for the inner cities, especially better schools for African American children, rather than bombing people of color halfway around the world!  That is hardly racism.  And it is not how the mainstream media wants us to think of The Donald.

Next, Glen Ford, the eloquent radical Left executive editor of Black Agenda Report, a superb and widely read outlet, penned an article in March 2016, with the following title: “Trump Way to the Left of Clinton on Foreign Policy – In Fact, He’s Damn Near Anti-Empire.” Ford’s piece is well worth reading in its entirety; here are just a few quotes :

“Trump has rejected the whole gamut of U.S. imperial war rationales, from FDR straight through to the present.”

 

“If Trump’s tens of millions of white, so-called ‘Middle American’ followers stick by him, it will utterly shatter the prevailing assumption that the American public favors maintenance of U.S. empire by military means.”

 

“Trump shows no interest in ‘spreading democracy,’ like George W. Bush, or assuming a responsibility to ‘protect’ other peoples from their own governments, like Barack Obama and his political twin, Hillary Clinton.”

 

“It is sad beyond measure that the near-extinction of independent Black politics has placed African Americans in the most untenable position imaginable at this critical moment: in the Hillary Clinton camp.

Next, let’s turn to John Pilger, the Left wing Australian journalist and documentary film maker who has been writing about Western foreign policy with unimpeachable accuracy and wisdom since the Vietnam War era.   Here are some of his comments on Trump:

“..Donald Trump is being presented (by the mass media) as a lunatic, a fascist.  He is certainly odious; but he is also a media hate figure.  That alone should arouse our skepticism.”

 

“Trump’s views on migration are grotesque, but no more grotesque than those of David Cameron. It is not Trump who is the Great Deporter from the United States, but the Nobel Peace Prize winner, Barack Obama.”

 

“In 1947, a series of National Security Council directives described the paramount aim of American foreign policy as ‘a world substantially made over in [America’s] own image’.  The ideology was messianic Americanism. We were all Americans. Or else. …”

 

“Donald Trump is a symptom of this, but he is also a maverick. He says the invasion of Iraq was a crime; he doesn’t want to go to war with Russia and China. The danger to the rest of us is not Trump, but Hillary Clinton. She is no maverick. She embodies the resilience and violence of a system whose vaunted ‘exceptionalism’ is totalitarian with an occasional liberal face.

The money quote is: “The danger to the rest of us is not Trump, but Hillary Clinton.”  When Pilger submitted his article to the “progressive” magazine Truthout, this sentence was deleted, censored as he reported, along with a few of the surrounding sentences.  Such censorship had not been imposed on Pilger by Truthout ever before.  Truthout’s commitment to free speech apparently has limits in the case of The Donald versus Hillary, rather severe ones.  So one must read even the progressive press with some skepticism when it comes to Trump.

Trump has also been noticed by the Left in Europe, notably by the sharp minded Jean Bricmont, physicist and author of Humanitarian Imperialism who writes here:

 

(Trump) “is the first major political figure to call for ‘America First’ meaning non-interventionism.  He not only denounces the trillions of dollars spent in wars, deplores the dead and wounded American soldiers, but also speaks of the Iraqi victims of a war launched by a Republican President. He does so to a Republican public and manages to win its support. He denounces the empire of US military bases, claiming to prefer to build schools here in the United States. He wants good relations with Russia. He observes that the militarist policies pursued for decades have caused the United States to be hated throughout the world. He calls Sarkozy a criminal who should be judged for his role in Libya. Another advantage of Trump: he is detested by the neoconservatives, who are the main architects of the present disaster.”

And then there is Stephen F. Cohen, contributing editor for The Nation and Professor Emeritus of Russian History at Princeton and NYU.  Cohen makes the point that Trump, alone among the presidential candidates, has raised five urgent and fundamental questions, which all other candidates in the major parties have either scorned or more frequently ignored. The five questions all call into question the interventionist warlike stance of the US for the past 20 plus years. Cohen enumerates the questions here, thus:

“Should the United States always be the world’s leader and policeman?

 

“What is NATO’s proper mission today, 25 years after the end of the Soviet Union and when international terrorism is the main threat to the West?

 

“Why does Washington repeatedly pursue a policy of regime change, in Iraq, Libya, possibly in Ukraine, and now in Damascus, even though it always ends in “disaster”?

 

“Why is the United States treating Putin’s Russia as an enemy and not as a security partner?

 

“And should US nuclear weapons doctrine include a no-first use pledge, which it does not?”

Cohen comments in detail on these questions here. Whatever one may think of the answers Trump has provided to the five questions, there is no doubt that he alone among the presidential candidates has raised them – and that in itself is an important contribution.

At this point, I mention my own piece, which appeared late last year.  Entitled “Who is the Arch Racist, Hillary or The Donald”?  Like Cohen’s pieces, it finds merit with the Trump foreign policy in the context of posing a question.

Finally, let us turn to Bill Blum, who wrote an article entitled, “American Exceptionalism and the Election Made in Hell (Or Why I’d Vote for Trump Over Hillary).”  Again there is little doubt about the stance of Blum, who is the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II, a scholarly compendium, which Noam Chomsky calls “Far and away the best book on the topic.”

Blum begins his piece:

“If the American presidential election winds up with Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump, and my passport is confiscated, and I’m somehow FORCED to choose one or the other, or I’m PAID to do so, paid well … I would vote for Trump.”

 

“My main concern is foreign policy. American foreign policy is the greatest threat to world peace, prosperity, and the environment. And when it comes to foreign policy, Hillary Clinton is an unholy disaster. From Iraq and Syria to Libya and Honduras the world is a much worse place because of her; so much so that I’d call her a war criminal who should be prosecuted.”

And he concludes:

“He (Trump) calls Iraq ‘a complete disaster’, condemning not only George W. Bush but the neocons who surrounded him. ‘They lied. They said there were weapons of mass destruction and there were none. And they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction.’ He even questions the idea that ‘Bush kept us safe’, and adds that ‘Whether you like Saddam or not, he used to kill terrorists’.”

“Yes, he’s personally obnoxious. I’d have a very hard time being his friend. Who cares?”

I conclude with Blum’s words because they are most pertinent to our present situation.  The world is living through a perilous time when the likes of the neocons and Hillary Clinton could lead us into a nuclear Armageddon with their belligerence toward Russia and their militaristic confrontation with China.

The reality is that we are faced with a choice between Clinton and Trump, a choice which informs much of the above commentary.  Survival is at stake and we must consider survival first if our judgments are to be sane.

Original Link: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-22/trumps-anti-interventionism-neocons-hate-it-anti-war-left-comes-around

Submitted by John Walsh via LewRockwell.com

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Al Nusra, Al Qaeda, Bolshevik Revolution, Color Revolution, Daesh, IS, ISIL, ISIS, Islamic State, Libya, Middle East, Migrant, NATO, Neo Con, NGO, NWO, Russia, Syria, Terrorism, Ukraine, USA, Vladimir Putin, WWIII

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)

German citizens are being coerced by the Establishment, the mainstream media and their own government to “willingly” accept a societal genocide or be labeled as right intolerant extremists, racists and even Nazis. This emotional „tour de force” could have never been possible without the backup of mainstream media propaganda. “On the ground”, migrant campaigns are structured with a push and pull migration strategy:

  • Push Strategy: NGOs push migrants to leave their countries of origin with incentives such as free transportation, prospect of better financial and employment opportunities, traveling tips in form of printed and digital material and even free smartphones upon arrival.  Migrant support to be found at site such as: Welcome To Europe w2eu.info, Watchthemed and WatchTheMed-Alarmphone.
  • Pull Strategy: NGOs and profit oriented organizations such as Amnesty International, Caritas and ORS “pull” migrants upon arrival with groups like Fluchhelfer encouraging EU citizens to illegally smuggle migrants into their country.

Remember unsavory George Soros’ reply to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban? “His [Viktor Orban] plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the  [migrants] as an obstacle, . . . [o]ur plan treats the protection of  [migrants] as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.” To complete Soros’ statement just add Dr. Thomas P.M. Barnett’s “mingling of races” geopolitical diatribe: “In Europe a light-brown race would emerge this way with an average intelligence quotient of 90 – ideal working slaves. . . . [I]rrational people who will fight against this mingling of races. . . . [W]e should kill them.”  As a reader you now should have an obvious overview of what is happening to our European Continent under massive attack.Clipboard_Image 006_F

George Soros’ Welcome to Europe (w2eu.info) platform states: “For freedom of movement: Independent information for refugees and migrant coming to Europe” but also “We welcome all travelers on their difficult trip and wish you all a good journey” and “Because freedom of movement is everybody’s right.”

Clipboard Image (14)_F

Sky Finds ‘Handbook’ For EU-Bound Migrants: “Refugees arriving in Greece on people smugglers’ boats are given a ‘migrants handbook’ packed with tips, maps, phone numbers and advice about getting across Europe. . . . The ‘rough guide’ is written in Arabic and contains phone numbers of organizations which might help refugees making the journey, such as the Red Cross and UNHCR. Among those behind the booklet are organizations called WatchTheMed-Alarmphone and w2eu, which means ‘Welcome To Europe.'” http://live.w2eu.info/category/germany/ gives additional and updated information on most (traveling and arriving) issues faced by migrants.

Clipboard Image (4)_FSonia, who did not want to give her surname, is a volunteer with WatchTheMed and told Sky News: ‘Activists from our network distribute the guides for free in Turkey’. The guide is distributed to refugees as they come ashore on the Aegean Islands and in Athens and other Greek cities. She added that other leaflets about safety at sea were distributed to would be migrants before they set out on their journeys with advice on what to do if they get into trouble on the water. The guide Sky News found also contained a 24-hour hotline number for migrants to call so volunteers can then pass their details to the relevant coastguard. ‘We are a big group of about 100 people’ she said. ‘We are based across Europe and North Africa.’ The pocket-sized guide has a handy map of Europe detailing the areas boats tend to land in. Marked in red are what it describes as ‘detention/reception/screening sites.'”

Clipboard_Image 007_F

Fluchthelfer.in or in English “Become an escape agent” is a German platform that encourages European citizens to break the constitutional laws of their countries’ sovereignty to “become an escape agent.” The German intro video of two and a half minutes features a white elderly couple driving and discussing the smuggling of a refugee inside the EU.  The elderly gentleman replies to his wife: “What we are doing here is not quite legal.” Fluchthelfer.in is an internet platform that also gives Migrants “the latest information” on lots of different legal and “not so legal tips and tricks” on how to “manage arrival” into their country of destination.

ORS Services, a Swiss company running migrant reception centers, is doing well. Run by London-based private equity firm Equistone Partners Europe Ltd, an affiliate of the Rothschild-owned Barclays Bank, which is considered to be the most influential financial institutions in the world.  German economist Wolfang Freisleben has described Barclays Bank as ‘Rothschilds slaughtership’. “It [ORS Services] now operates in Germany and Austria and recorded $99 million in revenue last year. ORS Service has thrived on Europe’s inability to cope with the refugee crisis.”

Clipboard_Image 005_FSilvia Wirnberger breaks down a report on Caritas: An organization helping the poor and needy (one would think) or a profit center belonging to the Catholic Church and mostly financed by German and Austrian taxpayers’ money? To most Austrians and Germans Caritas sounds “altruistic and generous” until one starts digging a big deeper! Caritas is an organization that churned out 712 Million EUR of mostly German and Austrian taxpayers’ money plus diverse government grants and state support. Caritas Austria gets a daily allowance of up to €77 for the care of a minor unaccompanied refugee. Austrian Caritas Secretary Klaus Schwertner claims that “similar care of Austrian children runs from €150 to €300 per day! He demands that the daily rates for refugee children should therefore be urgently increased to be able to ensure an ‘adequate and age-appropriate car.’ Caritas may well be a profit oriented organization disguising itself as an “altruistic Catholic institution.”

€300 daily allowance or €109K per year and per child? How can a German social worker survive on a €20K (per annum) income when having to entertain apartment, food, expenses and children going to school? As a footnote it is interesting to notice that the Industrial Revolution never took place in Catholic countries (Portugal, Spain, Italy and France) but in the Protestant ones (England, Germany, Flemish Belgium and The Netherlands). German Philosopher Max Weber: Die Protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus; The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is a must read if you have not done so yet.

German pharmaceutical industry is expecting EUR 13 billion additional business through products such as hepatitis C medical preparations with daily medication costs of an Iphone and a family house by the end of the treatment. Source: Udo Ulfkotte; Frubi TV | The Business of the (Rothschild) asylum industry

Udo Ulfkotte compares Siemens, the German industrial giant and its €70 Billion turnover with subsidiaries in 160 countries, to the national German social and asylum industries that represents a yearly turnover of €140 billion with a 2.5 million workforce. Compare those figures to the 700.000 workers the German automobile industry employs and it sure looks like the German governing coalition seems much more interested in financing the “misery business” than the manufacturing sector.

As a final thought let’s notice that the 3.000 German Mosques including Muslim clubs and Muslim associations have not shown much sign of “providing help” to the bulk of Muslim Migrants pouring in into Germany? Why? Udo Ulfkotte: “They prefer to have costs picked up by the unbelievers.”

In the German article: No solidarity for the refugees [migrants] (Keine Solidarität für die Flüchtlinge), Ali Ertan Toprak, Federal Chairman of the German Kurdish Association, is “proud of the fact that thousands of people have volunteered to welcome the refugees in their local communities. . . . In the administration of the [migrant] crisis Toprak observes that the Islamic associations and clubs have completely disappeared, something Toprak finds incomprehensible since 38% of the migrants are coming from Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Iran and Turkey (all Moslem countries).” This should not be a surprise since five of the wealthiest Gulf Nations: Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain have so far refused to take a single Syrian refugee.

Lots of institutions will derive profit from the migrant crisis: Health, pharma, food, larger corporation and politicians except for the German average working citizen who is forced to swallow an expensive pill while keeping his mouth shut for the better or for the worst.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Further Reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, Fascism, Geopolitics, George Soros, Geostrategy, Germany, Migrant, NWO, Refugees, Syria, USA

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part seven)

Let’s briefly review the legal difference between Migrant and Refugees in order to assess the present German crisis and avoid being swayed by ongoing western mainstream media propaganda.

“[A] Refugee [is a person who is] forced to leave [his] country because [he is] at risk of, or ha[s] experienced persecution. The concerns of refugees are human rights and safety, not economic advantage. They leave behind their homes, most or all of their belongings, family members and friends. Some are forced to flee with no warning and many have experienced significant trauma or been tortured or otherwise ill-treated. The journey to safety is fraught with hazard and many refugees risk their lives in search of protection. They cannot return unless the situation that forced them to leave improves.“

“A migrant is a person who makes a conscious choice to leave their country to seek a better life elsewhere. Before they decide to leave their country, migrants can seek information about their new home, study the language and explore employment opportunities. They can plan their travel, take their belongings with them and say goodbye to the important people in their lives. They are free to return home at any time if things don’t work out as they had hoped, if they get homesick or if they wish to visit family members and friends left behind.”

Some Migrants coming from Hungary and arriving in Austria even hire taxis: “Before this all started, [taxi] drivers would be lucky to earn 150 EUR in a 12-hour shift in Vienna. I don’t mind waiting sometimes five or six hours at a time because I know I will get a fare.” . . .  “Here at the Nickelsdorf crossing point, a long line of between 130 and 140 taxis snakes back from the border, waiting for the next train to disgorge its latest cargo of people on the Hungarian side, who then walk across.” Refugees do not hire cabs; they usually are content with food and shelter: those migrants are on the move for financial reasons.

1,2 to 1.5 million refugees migrants were “invited” by Kanzlerin Angela Merkel after unilaterally opening the German borders on September the fourth of 2015. Many German citizens are still wondering how could the leadership of one of the most powerful economies in the world do such an insane act of treason towards its own citizens?  Angela Merkel doesn’t have the legal (constitutional) right to remove Germany‘s national borders and jeopardize its sovereignty! What could be the reasons that led reluctant Hegemon Angela Merkel to become one of the worst post WWII self-destructing German kamikaze?

  • Corruption/Money incentives?
  • Possible (death) threats?
  • Possible promotion as United Nations Secretary-General or President of the European Council?
  • Childless German citizen succumbing to the renowned „pride“of the German holocaust shame?

A million of displaced citizens searching asylum for better economic conditions do not qualify as “refugees” as the western (German) propaganda would have us to believe but as migrants. Should we perceive this migrant crisis as the “sovereign protection” of the German citizens or the global protection of the Migrants?

Global oligarch Zionist cover-up “philanthropist” and “donor” George Soros clarifies the issue:  [Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s] plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees [migrants] as an obstacle, . . . [o]ur plan treats the protection of refugees [migrants] as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.” George Soros, a global citizen worth to be matched to U.S. geopolitical psychopath Dr. Thomas P.M. Barnett’s own words: “. . . In Europe a light-brown race would emerge this way with an average intelligence quotient of 90 – ideal working slaves. . . . [I]rrational people who will fight against this mingling of races. . . . [W]e should kill them.”

It is more than legitimate to suggest that migrants did cause the bulk of the sexual crimes committed on Germany’s 2015’s New Years Eve celebrations. Countless reports of sexual attacks and crimes were registered in Germany’s largest cities.

Mobs of nonwhite invader [migrants] took part in mass sex attacks in towns and cities all across Germany, Austria, and even Switzerland on New Year’s Eve; it has emerged as the controlled media’s censorship of refugee-crime collapses in the face of Internet and social media.”

  • Berlin
  • Bielefeld: where 150 “North African” refugee-criminals sexually harassed women on the main street and in a discotheque in the town;
  • Cologne
  • Düsseldorf
  • Frankfurt am Main (there is also a Frankfurt an der Oder)
  • Freiburg: In Freiburg there were a number of violent attacks on homosexuals in the city center. According to police reports, a large mob of refugee-criminals attacked, punched, and kicked the homosexuals outside one of their clubs in the town.
  • Hamburg
  • Leipzig
  • Munich: where groups of migrants harassed women in the city center on New Year’s Eve
  • Stuttgart

Austria: Salzburg: According to the Austrian OE24 news service, there were at least seven sex attacks in Salzburg, where there is a large invader center. And the list goes on and on: Austria: Vienna; Finland: Helsinki; Sweden: Kalmar, Switzerland: Zurich!

According German Journalist Gerhardt Wienewski, epic migration year 2015 represents a 1.2 to 1.5 million migrants  i n v a s i o n  for Germany. Not only should this invasion be analyzed as a potential societal and sociological suicide but considered in terms of military strategy.  You might think: over the top conspiracy theory? I thought “may be this time” Gerhard Wienewski did go an “extra geopolitical mile” but let’s reflect on Gerhard and Kelly M. Greenhill’s brilliant military analysis and consider this migration in military terms:

  • Occupation of the targeted country
  • Operational military base occupation
  • Weapon of mass migration
  • Forced Migration as “Non-Military” instrument of coercion
  • Extract political, military and/or economic concessions from target states
  • Hypocrisy costs via NGOs “protecting migrant’s safety”
  • 75 to 80 percent of migrants are young adult males
  • German Spring” 2016 and sexual crimes: women as the spoil of war

In Kelly M. Greenhill’s book “Weapons of Mass Migration”, Kelly examines the idea of how nations and non-state actors use forced migration as a non-military instrument of coercion. According Kelly M. Greenhill: “If traditional military coercion involves the use of threats or the use of force in order to extract changes in behavior, engineered migration by extension entails the threatened or the actual mass movement of people in order to extract political, military, and/or economic concessions from target states. Quite often this a tool that’s used by actors that are, relatively speaking, weaker than their targets and the threat to use demographic bombs or use people as weapons can help, unfortunately, level the playing field and give weak actors a sense of leverage to pressure target states in a way that allows them to punch above their weight from a strict capabilities standpoint. Unfortunately, this means that some of the world’s most vulnerable populations end up being pawns in this game between states and their targets.”

In part eight of this series, I will attempt to show how Germany and Austria have become the two targeted culprits of a vicious Western (U.S.) mass migration attack.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Further Reading

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)
  • Will the abrupt change of U.S. policy towards Syria prove the demise of NATO’s Western Alliance?
  • The Six-Step U.S. Strategy For Violent Regime Takeover

Additional Sources of information in English:

Additional Source of information in German:

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, Fascism, Geopolitics, George Soros, Germany, Migrant, NWO, Refugees, USA

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration Coming Full Circle (Part Five)

The circle of “mass migration weapon attempt” is closing in! Slowly but surely we are getting an overview of the New World Order’s “grand strategy!”

Let’s review the main points of this grand migration scheme:

A) Create a “U.S.-Homemade” 911 (100% internal) coup d’état upon your own (American) people.  Murder 2500 citizens thanks to George W. Bush and Anthony Charles Lynton Blair also known as Tony Blair.

B) Rally “(inter)national emotions” to justify a global war on terror: the perfect geopolitical recipe or “opener” for upcoming international conflicts “wherever, whenever and with whomever”! Take your pick: Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Sudan, Yemen or Mali!

C) Funnel the appropriate amount of money to “local freedom fighters” via NGOs. Create local “U.S. terrorist groups” such as Al Qaeda (as the U.S. did in 1979 when fighting Soviets troops in Afghanistan). Rename Al Qaeda into ISIS/ ISIL/IS/Daesh (Al Qaeda 2.0) wherever geopolitical needs may apply.

D) Apply U.S. Pentagon counterterrorism tactics to fight your own self-created CIA-led, CIA-trained and CIA-funded terrorist fractions (ISIS/IS/ISIL) led in your own command center: the Ankara U.S. Embassy in Turkey. Promote your campaign under the flag of  “Democracy” being fully aware that only geopolitical fools would believe in the spread of democracy in countries such as Libya, Syria, Iran, Irak, Yemen or Afghanistan!

E) Uphold the “spread of democracy” while pretending to defeat terrorism (your own “self-created” enemy.) Foster a color revolution as the perfect cover-up to destroy a country’s targeted infrastructure and transform it into a waste-state: Libya and Syria.

F) Create an army of migrants composed of vibrant citizens (75-80% are male.) Set up a migration agenda and transfer them to the target country of your choice.

It has come to our knowledge that U.S. organizations are paying for the boats taking thousands of refugees to Europe. U.S. organizations have created a co-financing scheme which provides for a considerable portion of the transportation costs. Not every refugee from North Africa has 11,000 Euro cash. Nobody is asking, where is the money coming from?” French government was caught selling life boats to refugees in Turkey via honorary pro-consul Françoise Olcay. France also caught supplying Migrants with real falsified Syrian Passports.

G) Upon arrival, supply your “migration army” with digital ammunition: smartphones

“A key ‘weapon’ used in 2011 by imperialism to destroy the institutions of the nation-state was the smartphone. Thousands of smartphones were provided to US-funded ‘activists’ during Zionism’s ‘Arab Spring’. It is unsurprising, therefore, to see that smartphones are being supplied to thousands of migrants by NGOs once they arrive in Europe. This could become a nightmare for any nation-state refusing to cooperate with imperialism’s migration agenda.”

H) Upon arrival brief your Migrants onto “what to expect”, their “rights” and their “destinations” (Germany for the most part) using onsite NGOs such as Red Cross, Caritas or Amnesty International, perfectly knowing that police won’t be allowed to participate or interfere! Don’t forget to give them a complementary smartphone thanks to the support of oligarchs such as Soros or Carlos Slim. Smartphones will give you the flexibility to arrange flash-mobs should you ever need it! Remember German New Year’s Eve in Cologne, Hamburg, Frankfurt, Düsseldorf, Berlin.

I) After arrival, outsource your “migrating crowd” to private enterprises (NGOs) and turn your Migrant crisis investment into a “million EUR” business opportunity (Rothschild and the Migrant Industry) This should reimburse your initial investment costs: transportation and smartphones —plus interests of course!

ORS Services, a Swiss company running migrant reception centers, is doing well. Run by London-based private equity firm Equistone Partners Europe Ltd, an affiliate of the Rothschild-owned Barclays Bank, which is considered to be the most influential financial institutions in the world. German economist Wolfang Freisleben has described Barclays Bank as ‘Rothschilds slaughtership’. “It [ORS Services] now operates in Germany and Austria and recorded $99 million in revenue last year. ORS Service has thrived on Europe’s inability to cope with the refugee crisis.”

No more worries! From now on, costs will be picked up by German/Austrian taxpayers, since the bulk of migrants are headed towards Austria/Germany: “The Promise land” of the two last booming European economies.

As you can see, your self-created “Migrant crisis Investment circle” just closed itself!

Global Elite’s “ROI”: Return On Investment, boat fares towards Europe and smartphone delivery upon arrival, will have to be financed by gullible European tax payers being constantly brainwashed by mainstream media that political correctness obliges them (especially Germans) to support, accept and contribute! Beware of (German) citizens not supporting the migrant tidal wave; they shall be stamped as “right extremists”, “fascists” or even “Nazis.”

It would be silly to think that 100% of the German population swallows the local main stream media propaganda of the German presstitutes nicknamed Lying Media: Lügenpresse! German journalists, scholars and historians such as Eva Herman, Jürgen Elsässer, Gerhard Wisnewski and Prof. Dr. Michael Vogt (to name just a few) are bravely counteracting the German government propaganda backed up by German Mainstream media represented by personalities such as Sandra Maischberger.

Resurging German national patriotism

Please bear in mind that the following example is not about a lady “propagandist” or “right extremist” presenting herself “silly!” Eva Herman, a 57 years young German TV anchor, is a married lady with one child; she lives in Hamburg. For many years Eva has been successfully working for German Mainstream TV stations such as ARD and NDR. She’s been acclaimed as one of the most successful (German) TV Anchors. Eva was eventually stamped as “right extremist” because of her honest reporting. Here’s Eva’s striking blog header:

NO to the Federal Republic of Germany  (Nein zur BRD) | YES to the Kingdom of Germany (Ja zum Deutschen Reich)Clipboard_Image 001

I’ve lived and traveled through Germany extensively for almost 30 years: from Dresden to Saarbrücken, Flensburg to Munich, Passau to Freiburg: a fabulous bunch of loving, kind, jovial and humorous people. The last three generations have nothing to do whatsoever with the genocide that happened during WWII.

ISIS, the U.S., NATO and CIA-led, CIA-financed private mercenaries, are creating chaos in the name of “terrorism”. Soros, Rockefellers, Bushes, Tony Blair, U.S. Washington Régime, England, France and Israel are looking for trouble by poking the Germans in a way they should not. Germany was coerced to “welcome” 1.2 to 1.5 Million migrants in 2015. An additional million (at least) will have arrived to Germany by the end of 2016.

Clipboard_Image 062

The “Establishment” should not incite a German blueprint of what happened in Egypt, Tahrir Square on February the 4th of 2011. Right now the West is pushing Germany over the edge: beware!

There is so much liquid to be poured into a jug. Eventually the laws of physics take over:

It overflows!

Bruno P. Gebarski

Further Reading:

 

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

 

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, Fascism, Geopolitics, George Soros, Germany, Middle East, Migrant, Neo Con, NWO, Refugees, Rockefeller, Russia, Syria, USA

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part Three)

We are being told by (German) Main Stream Media that Migrants are warmly accepted by the Germans (obviously things changed after the violence that took place on New Year’s Eve in Cologne, Düsseldorf and Hamburg). But is it or was it really so? Boatloads of “refugees” are originating from Northern Africa’s U.S. war-torn zones such as Libya, Tunisia, Syria, Iraq and Eurasian Afghanistan.

This kind of mass migration acceptance would not be possible without the support (propaganda) of the German Main Stream Media as Udo Ulfkotte showed in his book “Gekaufte Journalisten – Bought Journalists”.  Interesting to notice that a survey results presented to the Germans: “Welcome Refugees to Germany“ never mentioned that

Clipboard_Image 050

Source: quer-denken.tv

19,2% of the tweets originated from the UK, 17% from the U.S. and 5% from Australia! How on earth can the UK, U.S. and Australia represent the veracity of the German‘s reaction and perception to the Migrant crisis when only 6,4% of the tweets originated from Germany?

We now know that 75%-80% of the migrants are healthy and vibrant young men being purposely sent to Germany and Austria! They arrive by boat mostly financed by the U.S.: do watch this excellent video breaking down what is happening between Libya and Europe. The „choice“ of „refugees“ moved to Germany/Austria must be carefully „chosen“ as the bulk of them are „healthy and full of vitality“ as we were able to witness in „New Year‘s Eve attacks on women“ in the second and fourth largest German cities of Hamburg and Cologne (Köln).

This „migration scheme“ seems well organized.  Austrian authorities know that “paperless migrants“ arrive without phones but are given a smartphone after going through “local authority procedures.”  It’s impossible to acquire a mobile phone in Austria or Germany without showing personal identification, a residential address and a bank account: “it’s for security reason” we have been told! So how can unregistered migrants be given smartphones?  Who is giving it to them including A1 Austrian Network SIM-cards? Who is footing the bill? Could it be the owner of Austrian A1, Carlos Slim the Mexican billionaire and second richest man in the world?

With smart phones not only can migrants call families back home, which is very understandable, of course, but also instantly organize flash mobs – or other joint activities that do not correspond to the practices of the local population!” Think New Year’s Eve (terrorist) attacks on women in Cologne and Hamburg.  Things are rarely given for free unless Return on Investment (ROI) is to be expected. So, what sort of ROI are we here talking about? Is the Establishment trying to create social tension within Germany and Austria’s while weakening the economic heartland of Europe?

Germany’s federal states are planning to spend around EUR 17 billion ($18.7 billion) on dealing with the refugee crisis in 2016, the newspaper Die Welt said on Tuesday, citing a survey it conducted among their finance ministries. The sum, bigger than the EUR 15.3 billion that the central government planned to allocate to its education and research ministry in 2015, is a measure of the strain that the influx is causing across the country as a whole.“

In 2015, the German government is going to spend more money on its Migrant crisis than on its education! Have the Germans been democratically asked about This? No! They have not. Dr. Prof. Michael Vogt from Quer-Denken TV is suggesting that the Migrant crisis is specifically targeted to Germany and Austria: Europe’s two strongest economies. The destructive results of mass migration will be felt on both sides for a long time to come. While Migrants will never feel home, Germans are being robbed of their homeland identity.

Dr. Thomas P. M. Barnett‘s bizarre geopolitical views could give the creeps to any sound minded individual listening to his material. Probably a derailed geostrategic genius! One of his strategies for Europe (to remain a U.S. vassal) could be very enhanced and accelerated by long term „Mingling of races“ – a targeted strategy of the New World Order.”

„In his books ‘The Pentagon’s New Map‘ – meaning so to speak – the US-Defense-Ministry’s new version of the world map and ‘Blueprint for ActionDr. Thomas P. M. Barnett turns out to be a cynical supporter of globalization. He claims that the final goal of globalization is ‘the synchronization of all the countries on earth‘. To be achieved, as he says, through a ‘mingling of the races.'” “According to Barnett, In Europe a light-brown race would emerge this way with an average intelligence quotient of 90 – ideal working slaves. Barnett warns in his books against ‘irrational people who will fight against this mingling of races’. He continues in a threatening tone, pointing out that he certainly takes notice of the irrational arguments of their opponents. However if they should put up any resistance against the global world order – he demands ‘we should kill them.'”

So what could be the reasons for the Establishment to threaten Germany with this Weapon of Mass Migration? According Kelly M. Greenhill, Author of “Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy”, this type of asymmetrical warfare has been used more than fifty times in the second part of the 20th Century.

Clipboard_Image 053

So is Germany the recent victim of Weapons of Mass Migration? Is Angela Merkel, the German Kanzler(in) coerced by the U.S. (and her oath of allegiance) to accept this flood of migrants pouring in into Germany?  What is the geopolitical goal of this “organized” human tidal wave?  What are the possible reasons for Germany to be under U.S., Britain and  France’s geopolitical attack?

  1. The inner strength of the German (and Austrian) economies: the only two EU-candidates still resisting the destruction of the fascist Euro straitjacket and the EU’s financial looting?
  2. The renewed Nord Stream 2 pipeline Gazprom agreements between Germany and Russia from whom Germany imports 40% of its gas and 30% of its crude oil?
  3. A worse conceivable U.S. threat: Germany and Russia become allies again! The reason for a U.S. coup d’état in Ukraine and how the U.S. coerced Europe into imposing economic sanctions upon Russia?
  4. Angela Merkel’s CDU being reluctant to sign TTIP, the fascist, kleptocrat and oligarch U.S. agreement that would remove the little of what is left of our German/European sovereignty?
  5. Germany and France (François Hollande) turning their support towards Russia in their common fight against ISIS, the U.S. terror subsidiary led by the CIA?
  6. France and Germany creating a split within the Western Alliance of NATO by turning towards Russia in attacking ISIS?

The German leadership’s psychological game is evil, subtle and refined. It abuses its national shameful past: The WWII Jewish holocaust. This emotional shameful “weapon” is used by the government, institutions, medias and NGOs against its own people with the aim of marginalizing citizens expressing legitimate concerns about the migrants such as costs, violence (as exemplified during new year’s eve events in Cologne) and terrorism. They are automatically stamped as “intolerant”, “right extremist” or even “Nazi”: a feeling Germans do not want to be reminded of or associated with because of the difficult past of their national history.

Clipboard_Image 054

A final quote from Joschka Fischer former German Minister and Vice-Bundeskanzler

“The plundering of Germany; a raison d’état”

Germany is the problem, because the Germans are more diligent, disciplined and talented than the rest of Europe. This will always lead to inequalities. But it can be counter measured by moving as much money as possible outside of Germany. It does not matter for what it is, even if it is radically wasted – the main thing, the Germans do not have it and already the world is saved.” —Joseph Martin “Joschka” Fischer

Bruno P. Gebarski

Further Reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, Geopolitics, Germany, Middle East, Migrant, Refugees, Russia, Syria, USA

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part Two)

German Mainstream Media would have us believe that we are facing a crisis of refugees fleeing from their homeland because of persecution. They present emotional scenes of German U.S. vassal representative Angela Merkel taken with children when actually the bulk of the migrants (75-80%) are healthy young men coming from the U.S. war-torn countries of Libya, Tunisia, Iraq and Afghanistan.

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”—Marcus Tullius Cicero, Roman Philosopher (107 BC — 43 BC)

It can never be stressed enough how 911 was the fascist trigger and U.S. national coup d’état that opened the door and “legitimized” the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Under the forefront of “fighting terrorism” the rogue Babylonian Colonial U.S. Empire could now aggress whomever and wherever or whenever “terrorism” would apply! Remember General Wesley Clark Retired 4-star U.S. Army general, Supreme Allied Commander of NATO during the 1999 War on Yugoslavia? ““We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” Why? No reason for it whatsoever: “Nothing else to do.”

The U.S. war machine has military personnel in 130 nations and 900 overseas bases. This geopolitical monster grants itself the unilateral right to fight terrorism wherever or whenever it decides to do so. If the “Western Coalition” cannot find terrorism, it just creates it (Al Qaeda and ISIS aka Al Qaeda 2.0) and then justifies boots on the ground to combat the very terrorism it itself created!  Attack any country under the excuse of protecting democracy when actually the alleged “rogue nation” is “taken down” step by step and transformed into a failed state.

Clipboard_Image_16_F

Under the leadership of Muammar Gaddafi, Libya became one of the most prosperous northern African countries until the U.S. and its coalition turned it into a failed state quietly bombing the country after obtaining a no flying zone from the U.N.

The U.S. hopped for a repeat in Syria but Russia and China (having learned their lesson from the U.S. invasion in Libya) stepped in and gave the U.S. a stop sign! This led the U.S. to create ISIS (Al Qaeda 2.0): a Langley CIA subsidiary led by General Petraeus: His own group of hired, financed and led mercenaries/terrorists working on behalf of the CIA and the United States of America!

“[One] can’t discuss the birth of ISIS without crediting former CIA director and now convicted felon, General Petraeus.  It was Petraeus, as U.S. military commander in Iraq in 2005 that agreed to “dance with the devil.”  [General] Petraeus suggested that the U.S. side with Wahhabist groups warring on the U.S. backed Shiite government as a “quick and dirty” fix to Iraq’s American induced civil war which had taken over 5000 American lives and killed two million Iraqis. Though [General] Petraeus and the U.S. billions spent organizing and financing Sunni extremists in Iraq that would make up the core of ISIS leadership may predate involvement of John McCain and American generals such as Vallely and MacInerney…”

The irony of the ISIS U.S. debacle happened when Vladimir Putin offered to “fight ISIS” alongside the U.S.! A diplomatic embarrassment for the Washington rogue régime. “We’ll fight ISIS until its complete annihilation’ said Russian FM Lavrov in a meeting with John Kerry in Zurich on January the 20th of 2016.

The best sort of enemy is the one we create ourselves: It is the easiest one to combat: we know its exact position at all time, what military equipment it uses (since we are the one delivering it to him), its man power since we are the one who hired its mercenaries / terrorists in the first place” —Gerhard Wisnewski (German Journalist)

As a footnote, it is worth reminding ourselves that Al Qaeda has already been established by the U.S. in 1979 to combat the Soviet Union during the war in Afghanistan. Pretending afterwards that Al Qaeda has turned into an “enemy asset” to be destroyed is nothing less than absurd and nonsensical!

Part 3 will detail how Washington uses most likely a Migrant Crisis to destabilize the two most powerful economies in Europe: Germany and Austria.

Further Reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

Leave a comment

Filed under Corruption, Fascism, Geopolitics, Germany, Migrant, Refugees, Russia, Syria, USA

Fifteen Years of U.S.-led and (Western) NATO “Terror Management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part One)

A few days ago Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump made an intriguing statement:

“We have a little situation that could be a Trojan horse. You look at what is happening in Germany. Cologne never had a problem. Cologne, Germany. Everything’s fine. No problem. Now they are having riots, they’re having rapes. Have you heard about the New Year’s Eve [attack]? It was like a disaster. And the German people are going to riot. The German people are going to end up overthrowing [Angela Merkel]. I don’t know what the hell she is thinking. But they have millions of people pouring into Germany, now they’re not stopping them. Now I guess they are going to have to stop them because the German people aren’t going to put up [with it].”

Clipboard_Image 036

I entertain a solid relationship with good friends of mine who own a superb atelier restoring furniture here in the center of Hamburg, Germany’s second largest city in the quiet Jewish neighborhood of Grindelhof, near the international tennis venue of Rothenbaum Chaussee.  Suzanne and Thomas Balzuweit (owners) are nervous; and they have reasons to be.  Chatting with the both of them, while sipping on a superb German lager, helped me realized that both of them are CDU advocates: Christian Democratic Union and its leader Angela Merkel who became Bundeskanzlerin in 2005.

“This cannot go on like this,” Suzanne said, “something must happen and this time ‘hell is going to break lose!’” … “Our government is forgetting and betraying us … Angela Merkel is not representing our interests anymore.” I asked Suzanne: “how many refugees could be pouring in into Hamburg?” She answered: “…About a couple of hundred daily,” while adding passionately: “… And this is going to have to end otherwise our upper-class clientele is going to stop restoring…”

Jürgen Elsässer, who wants Angela Merkel to be arrested, estimates the amount of refugees that have poured in into Germany last year to be around two million (for a German population of roughly 82,6 Million).  How did it all get started? The West (England, U.S. France) has been looting and stealing from poor countries with institutions such as IMF (conceived at a UN conference in Bretton Woods, in July 1944.) for decades: nothing new under the sun of Western Imperialism!

So what triggered this intercontinental migration of races towards Europe? Who is sponsoring the migration of peoples that have very little in common with the Judeo-Christian background of our European Continent?

I’d like to suggest that 2011/911 was the trigger; an internal U.S. coup d’état; a theatrical Orwellian production, an 180° turnaround repeat of our French Bastille Day staged by a corrupt fascist criminal elite willing to sacrifice 2.500 innocent lives for the political aim of destabilizing the U.S. and the Western geopolitical terrain going on forward.  911 was a diabolically planned and orchestrated attack! A thermite implosion, (including Hollywood pyrotechnical effects) of both World Trade Center Towers with an egregious 47 storey Salomon Brothers Building collapse “encore” via “live” BBC anchor Jane S. Stanley reporting.  Stanley and her British Radio Broadcasting were caught lying since airing the collapse twenty three minutes before it even happened!

Is it terrorism that led the U.S. to attack Afghanistan and start a war in Iraq? Or was it about the nefarious geofinancial interests in London / Washington / Paris and the control of the “Big-Five” worldwide cartels: Financial, Media, Energy, Military and Pharmacy / Chemical / Health / Food?

General Wesley Clark, retired 4-star U.S. Army general, Supreme Allied Commander of NATO during the 1999 War on Yugoslavia, shed some light on the background of what is about to follow: “We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.”

What were the reasons? none! No new development on the terror front!

The Mainstream Media “terrorism” smokescreen and its “Al Qaeda/Isis/Isil/Is/Daesh” CIA-hired, financed and led mercenaries from the U.S. Embassy Command Center in Ankara (Turkey) has little to do with what is going on! It is all about “business as usual” or the geofinancial control of the “Big-Five” and central banking command and control!

Did you know that since the 1776 establishment of the United States of America, there’s never been a single day without U.S. involvement in at least one war?

According Prof. Dr. Michael Friedrich Vogt, profit and share-value of larger U.S. Military Corporations have increased by 2700% in the last ten years! 

A cascade of U.S. color revolutions and coup d’états to follow: 2001 Afghanistan:

The U.S. invaded Afghanistan (already there as early as 2000) for the main purpose of controlling the cocaine trade circulating directly via NATO airbases: Incirlik (Turkey) and Ramstein (Germany).  According John F. Abbotsford, a 38-year old Afghan war veteran, and former CIA analyst: “The CIA has been dealing drugs since its creation. They’ve been smuggling drugs everywhere in the world for the past 60 years, in Taiwan in 1949 to support Chiang Kai-shek against the Chinese commies, in Vietnam, in Nicaragua, and that’s just the tip of the iceberg” he launched out during the court trial. “We helped the Mujahideen develop poppy cultivation to fight the Soviets, but we took back matters in our own hands in 2001 when we invaded Afghanistan under Bush.”

After 911, the US military-industrial complex quickly invaded Afghanistan and began facilitating the reinstatement of the country’s poppy industry. According to the United Nations Drug Control Program (UNDCP), opium cultivation increased by 657 percent in 2002 after the US military invaded the country under the direction of then-President George W. Bush.

Clipboard_Image 037

In 2015 Zeroe Hedge reported: “…Opium production is stronger than ever in Afghanistan, which now produces 90 percent of the world’s supply of the plant that’s refined to create heroin. This rise in production would have been impossible prior to the U.S.-led invasion, and it comes despite some $8.4 billion spent in counternarcotics efforts by the U.S., specifically designated to wipe out opium production in Afghanistan.”

In part two we will strive to give you an overview of what triggered the U.S. and British coalition to invade the sovereign nation of Iraq.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Further Reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, Fascism, Geopolitics, Germany, Middle East, Refugees, Syria