Monthly Archives: February 2016

Britain & U.S. Pre-WWI “Terror Management” | The British and German Navies | The Lusitania Trap (Part One)

Background information is mandatory in order to better understand the astounding development (die großartige Entwicklung) of the German economy between 1871 and 1914: One of WWI forerunners was the development of the German Navy vis-à-vis the British one: A development not every one is familiar with!

“The seeds of World War One were not nurtured amid lofty principles of liberty, religious freedom or from a need to topple cruel despots. It was a conflict conceived in smoke-filled board rooms, political offices, stock exchanges and banks on both sides of the Atlantic [Federal Reserve: Max Moritz Warburg and his brother Paul Moritz Warburg] and carried to term by various parties who stood to gain politically or financially. Birthed into the waiting arms of jealousy, politics and greed, it was a banal, vile creation, an artificially inseminated monster that maimed and murdered a generation of young men and laid a direct pathway to another war. To achieve this goal, motivations and villains had to be artificially crafted. What ensued was the largest ethnic assault in human history.” Source: exulanten.com/hysteria

In an International Encyclopedia of the First World War article: Naval Race between Germany and Great Britain, 1898-1912,” Dirk Bönker writes: “The Anglo-German naval race was the most spectacular strand of the general maritime arms build-up before World War I. Often, albeit misleadingly, described as both the first and the prototypical arms race among modern industrial nations, this arms race resulted from and lent shape to the Anglo-German antagonism.

German antagonism or Germanophobia deserves careful attention. Thanks to resources such as Exulanten and Germanophobia.net we do get an alternative view of Pre-WWI (German) history.

Clipboard_Image 004_FGeorge Orwell (author of 1984) called Indian born British author Rudyard Kipling a “prophet of British Imperialism”. A pre-WWI British Germanophobic propagandist who did not mince words: “However the world pretends to divide itself, there are only two divisions in the world today: human beings and Germans.” More Germanophobic feelings were to follow with a quote from Walther Rathenau (1867–1922) a German statesman who served as Foreign Minister during the Weimar Republic:

“The towns of Germany will not stand in ruins, but will exist as semi-lifeless blocks of stone partially inhabited by a few poor wretches. The streets of certain quarters will be crowded, but all joy and brilliancy will have gone forever. Wearied figures will drag along the rotten pavement toward their slum dwellings. The country roads will be broken up, the forests cut down, and scanty crops be growing in the fields. Docks, railways and canals will have decayed and everywhere the weather-beaten buildings, the monuments of our greatness, will have become homes of sadness.” 

German Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel is no exception to this public display of Germanophobic outburst when recently caught putting away a German flag during a rally.

Europe_F_Triple.Entente_France.Britain.RussiaThe German Navy League (Deutscher Flottenverein) was formed by Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz in 1898. Tirpitz was the head of the German Naval Office (Reichsmarineamt). A Naval Race between Germany and Great Britain, started after the German Navy Bills of 1906 and 1908 were passed and the German Naval Office (Reichsmarineamt.) Between 1898 and 1908, the “Deutscher Flottenverein”, German Navy League grew from 78,762 to 1.036,329 members. In “Reshaping the German Right: Radical Nationalism and Political Change After Bismarck”, Author Eley Geoff relates how the “Deutscher Flottenverein (German Navy League) grew to more than one million members to become a threat to the British navy! Could this German navy development have been the reason for the formation of the Triple Entente of what could be perceived as an anti-German coalition including Britain, France and Russia?

The WWI Battle of Coronel took place on the first of November 1914 off the coast of central Chile near the city of Coronel. The German Kaiserliche Marine forces led by Vice-Admiral Graf Maximilian von Spee met and defeated a Royal Navy squadron commanded by Rear-Admiral Sir Christopher Cradock. The strength of the German navy was again put on display during The Battle of Jutland (German: Skagerrakschlacht, the Battle of Skagerrak) fought by the British Royal Navy’s Grand Fleet under Admiral Sir John Jellicoe, against the Imperial German Navy’s High Seas Fleet under Vice-Admiral Reinhard Scheer during the First World War.

__Untitled.FThe Triple Alliance and the competing German and British navies could have very well been the right “geopolitical powder keg” for the upcoming of one of Europe’s bloodiest wars. The ongoing race between British and German navies was most likely the backdrop for what was to become the Lusitania tragedy.

When the Lusitania was launched, she was intended to be the largest, fastest ship ever built, doing better than 25 knots at top speed. Britain had enjoyed naval superiority since 1815, but was gravely impacted by the popularity and financial success of the German luxury liners of Hamburg-Amerika and Norddeutscher Lloyd, and she hoped that Lusitania would restore her sagging reputation. Her maiden voyage was on September 7, 1907 and for the next nine years, the Lusitania crossed the Atlantic 100 times. Her 101st voyage on May 7, 1915 would be her last.” (Source: http://exulanten.com/lucy.html)

On her last trip from New York to Liverpool it is relevant to point out that the Lusitania “had been withdrawn from passenger service for conversion to war before being returned to civilian status.” Edward Griffin writes in his marvelous work: “The Creature From Jekyll Island, “…She [The Lusitania] was virtually a floating ammunition depot.” The ship then had lost its non-military status to become a target of war. It was also known that the Lusitania had entered the Admiralty fleet register as an armed auxiliary cruiser and was listed in Jane’s fighting Ships.

The Germans knew that the Lusitania was carrying military supplies bound for Germany’s enemies on the Western Front. The German embassy in Washington even took the precaution of placing an advertisement in 50 U.S. newspapers warning civilians not to sail on the Lusitania. Due to the intervention of the State Department most of the notices were not published. However, the Des Moines Register carried the following advert which was placed beside an ad for the Lusitania:

“NOTICE!”

Clipboard Image_F“TRAVELLERS intending to embark on the Atlantic voyage are reminded that a state of war exists between Germany and her allies and Great Britain and her allies; that the zone of war includes the waters adjacent to the British Isles; that, in accordance with formal notice given by the Imperial German Government, vessels flying the flag of Great Britain, or any of her allies, are liable to destruction in those waters and that travellers sailing in the war zone on the ships of Great Britain or her allies do so at their own risk.”

In the next article, we’ll review the sinking of the Lusitania and how the Federal Reserve, the Warburg brothers, Britain, France and the U.S. turned a European conflict into World War One.

Bruno Gebarski

Further Reading:

  • Britain & U.S. Pre-WWI “Terror Management” | The British and German Navies | The Lusitania Trap (Part 10)
  • Western NATO and U.S.-led geopolitical duplicity (1949 — 2016) | MittelEuropa, Lebensraum and U.S.-Vassal State Germany (Link)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (part 9)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)
  • Will the abrupt change of U.S. policy towards Syria prove the demise of NATO’s Western Alliance? (link)
  • The Six-Step U.S. Strategy For Violent Regime Takeover (Link)

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Western NATO and U.S.-led geopolitical duplicity (1949 — 2016) | MittelEuropa, Lebensraum | U.S. Vassal State Germany

The Telegraph Europe’s Editor Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse are either geopolitical slapstick comedians or two knuckleheads (dummköpfchen in German) who have lost their political common sense and sold their journalistic raison d’être to a Western never ending anti-Russian media propaganda. Their recent article:”Russia accused of clandestine funding of European parties” and “UK warns of ‘new Cold War’ as Kremlin seeks to divide and rule in Europe.” is an insult to the sound mind and an additional contribution to the debris of geopolitical waste.

Clipboard_Image 019_F

Contrary to what vaudeville comics Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse report, the U.S. has never been interested in the welfare of the German and/or European people whatsoever: Quite the contrary! Germany has become U.S. (NATO) Central European’s dumping ground providing additional territorial space to nature’s oceanic buffer zone! The U.S. has turned our little European continent into a dangerous lethal playground: The result of an increasingly rogue and war mongering Washington régime. And no Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse, Russia did not annex Crimea. Please Gentlemen, do your homework, as we should expect from journalists doing their job accurately instead of the news presstitutes you’ve turned yourselves into.

Even German pro-U.S. propagandist “Der Spiegel” reported: Ukraine-Crisis:  400 U.S.-mercenaries from Academi [Blackwater] are fighting against separatists (Ukraine-Krise: 400 US-Söldner von Academi [Blackwater] kämpfen gegen Separatisten). Consider this hired Blackwater/Academi entity:  Positionened on rooftops, shooting both at police and public demonstrators. These US-based sniper elements were verified by Estonian Embassy translators. They appeared to have been hired by the Maidan Regime, supplied by the U.S. and Langley (CIA).

Clipboard_Image 031

German “Der Spiegel” Western Propaganda

  • Putin, the Dangerous Neighbor | Putin, der gefährliche Nachbarn
  • Stop Putin Now! | Stoppt Putin Jetzt!
  • Putin: the Arsonist/Firestarter | Putin, der Brandstifter
  • Obama Super Star | Obama Super Star
  • Obama, the World President | Obama, der Weltpräsident
  • Obama, the Messiah Factor | Obama, Der Messias Faktor

Wasn’t it bubblegum-chewing Mafia doll Victoria Nuland who said in a leaked private foul-mouthed indiscretion to U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt: “F**k the EU. . . . I think Yats [Arseny Yatsenyuk] is the guy who’s got the economic experience. . . . “I’ve got a five billion USD budget? Wasn’t it the same Victoria Nuland aiming at standing out in her political  career and sounding more macho, miserable and moronic than her male American counterparts? Wasn’t it German chancellor Angela Merkel who described Victoria Nuland’s remarks as “totally unacceptable”? How about the 33 tons of Ukraine central bank’s gold bullion removed, confiscated and stolen then quickly spirited back to New York for “Safe Keeping “and rehypothecation? All this for the sake of the United States “safeguarding” our European interests? Yeah sure!

Since 9/11, regardless of where U.S. agent provocateur has boots on the ground, chaos, destruction and squalor are left behind. In the name of “democracy”, self-created tailor-made terrorist schemes (Al Qaeda/ISIS/IS/ISIL/Daesh) have been applied to countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Mali, Yemen and now Germany (see migrant crisis parts three, four and five) leaving behind a destructive path of destabilization and destruction.

Geopolitics_Germany_Morgenthau.Plan_FSeveral months before the end of the war, General Patton had recognized the fearful danger to the West posed by the Soviet Union, and he had disagreed bitterly with the orders which he had been given to hold back his army and wait for the Red Army to occupy vast stretches of German, Czech, Rumanian, Hungarian, and Yugoslav territory, which the Americans could have easily taken instead.” Obviously, Russia must not have been presenting a threat to the U.S. and the security of its Allies! So why then would the West create such a communist threat hysteria while allowing the Red Army to enter Berlin in the first place? Or was it rather a repeat of a nefarious plan to carve out Germany? An updated version of the 1919 Versailles treaty?

Hungary’s Jobbik, Greece’s Golden Dawn, Italy’s Lega Nord, and France’s Front National are simply exposing EU’s corruption while the U.S. and NATO transform our continent into a warzone powder keg! Altruistic U.S. hegemon? U.S. concern about a potential European “Putin-threat” is a complete nonsense Washington and our European governments would want us to believe. Just like the U.S. post-WWII fabricated “communist threat” did not exist, the present imaginary “Russian threat” does not either. The real threat to European security does not come from Russia: The real threat to European security comes from the Washington Régime of the United States of America.

__Untitled

In an excellent read: Seventy years of harassing political establishment and people of Europe, Andrey Fomin raises the question:

“Why the hell do U.S. intelligence agencies care about challenges to Europe’s internal security? Aren’t they the same agents who finance, recruit, and control countless political organizations, individuals, and media outlets on the European continent? Why are they so brazenly revealing their dominion over Europe?” Andrey Fomin goes on to say: “A politically correct challenger would argue that the United States saved Europe from the “Communist threat” after the end of WWII, facilitated its speedy economic recovery, and is still safeguarding the continent under its nuclear umbrella. Perhaps. But a review of the historical background should not begin with the Marshall Plan. First of all, that was launched in April 1948. Since the Nazis capitulated in May 1945, a misinformed reader might deduce that the United States had been drafting a massive investment program for Europe for as long as three years, and … he would be wrong. At the Second “Octagon” Quebec Conference in September 1944, President Roosevelt and US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr. submitted to the British PM Winston Churchill their Post-Surrender Program for Germany. That strictly confidential document envisaged the partition and complete deindustrialization of the German state. According to the plan, Germany was to be divided into two independent states. Its epicenters of mining and industry, including the Saar Protectorate, the Ruhr Valley, and Upper Silesia were to be internationalized or annexed by France and Poland…”

Recommendation for a German-Program after Capitulation [“Morgenthau-Plan”] , September the 6th of 1944 (Document in English starting page three)

Clipboard_Image 030_FDemilitarization of Germany

It should be the aim of the [US] Allied Forces to accomplish the complete demilitarization of Germany in the shortest possible period of time after surrender. This means completely disarming the German Army and people (including the removal or destruction of all war material), the total destruction of the whole German armament industry, and the removal or destruction of other key industries which are basic to military strength.

  1. Partitioning of Germany.
  • (a) Poland should get that part of East Prussia which doesn’t go to the U.S.S.R. and the southern portion of Silesia as indicated on the attached map,
  • (b) France should get the Saar and the adjacent territories bounded by the Rhine and the Moselle Rivers.
  • (c) As indicated in part 3 an International Zone should be created containing the Ruhr and the surrounding industrial areas.
  • (d) The remaining portion of Germany should be divided into two autonomous, independent states, (1) a South German state comprising Bavaria, Wuerttemberg, Baden and some smaller areas and (2) a North
  • German state comprising a large part of the old state of Prussia, Saxony, Thuringia and several smaller states. There shall be a custom union between the new South German state and Austria, which will be restored to her pre-1938 political borders.
  1. The Ruhr Area.
  • (The Ruhr, surrounding industrial areas, as shown on the attached map, including the Rhineland, the Keil Canal, and all German territory north of the Keil Canal.) Here lies the heart of German industrial power, the cauldron of wars. This area [The Ruhr] should not only be stripped of all presently existing industries but so weakened and controlled that it can not in the foreseeable future become an industrial area. The following steps will accomplish this:
  • (a) Within a short period, if possible not longer than 6 months after the cessation of hostilities, all industrial plants and equipment not destroyed by military action shall either be completely dismantled and removed from the area or completely destroyed. All equipment shall be removed from the mines and the mines shall be thoroughly wrecked. It is anticipated that the stripping of this area would be accomplished in three stages:
  • (i) The military forces immediately upon entry into the area shall destroy all plants and equipment which cannot be removed.
  • (ii) Removal of plants and equipment by members of the United Nations as restitution and reparation (Paragraph 4).
  • (iii) All plants and equipment not removed within a stated period of time, say 6 months, will be completely destroyed or reduced to scrap and allocated to the United Nations.
  • (b) All people within the area should be made to understand that this area will not again be allowed to become an industrial area. Accordingly, all people and their families within the area having special skills or technical training should be encouraged to migrate permanently from the area and should be as widely dispersed as possible.
  • (c) The area should be made an international zone to be governed by an international security organization to be established by the United Nations. In governing the area the international organization should be guided by policies designed to further the above stated objectives.

Clipboard_Image 028This was the original postwar proposed Magnus Opus recovery program for Germany, known as the Morgenthau Plan. It is well worth reminding the reader that the Germanophobic psychopath, Theodore Newman Kaufman, author of “Germany Clipboard_Image 032must perish” is most likely the one who provided the framework to the Morgenthau plan. However, the Morgenthau plan did not take into account Europe’s propensity towards socialism dating back to the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution that initiated the spread of communism/socialism throughout Europe. Most likely, the Morgenthau Plan could have caused a Soviet (USSR) threat to a fragile post-WWII European continent thus it was replaced by the Marshall plan: A plan made to “revive” the economies of Europe away from any Soviet industrial sphere of influence.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Additional sources in alphabetical order:

Additional Reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (part 9)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Academi, Angela Merkel, Blackwater, Bolshevik Revolution, Coup d'état, Fascism, Geopolitics, Geostrategy, Germany, Karl Haushofer, Morgenthau Plan, NATO, Neo Con, Russia, Theodore N. Kaufman, Ukraine, Uncategorized, USA, Victoria Nuland, Winston Churchill, WWI, WWII

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (Part Nine)

”Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” Jorge Agustín Nicolás Ruiz de (George) Santayana, Spanish-born philosopher  (1863 — 1952)

“War is the continuation of politics by other means.” Carl von Clausewitz, Prussian General (1780 — 1831)

Relying on Western Mainstream media is often connected to propaganda and geopolitical lies such as:

  • 9/11 was an Al Qaeda “terror attack” on America (which in some way it was because Al Qaeda is a U.S. CIA asset in the first place!)
  • Russia is alone to be blamed for the Ukrainian conflict
  • Crimea “was invaded” by Vladimir Putin
  • Libya was freed from Muammar al-Gaddafi for “democratic” reasons
  • Egypt and its Arab Spring was the outburst of a “democratic” revolution

Many things are not what they appear to be and many historical events, we were taught at schools/universities or read about, rarely recount the truth of what happened!  Wars are (often) initiated by financial institutions and their bankster cabal!

Could this have been the case when, on June the 28th of 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, were shot dead in Sarajevo (Serbia)? Shortly after their assassination, Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Britain, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Italy, Serbia, Russia, Turkey and the U.S. got involved in a cataclysmic chain of events that would make up for one of the bloodiest wars in European history.

How could a European conflict (and World War One) end up with Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles, often known as the War Guilt Clause, and Germany bearing alone the full moral responsibility for this (European) catastrophe?

“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.” (Treaty of Versailles, Article 231)

Books_Christopher.Clark_The.SleepwalkersAustralian historian and scholar Christopher Clark, author of “The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914, makes an insightful statement: “Those who think that my book is about an acquittal of Germany’s great responsibility for the conflict are on the wrong path. This book does not set Germany free from its shared responsibility of the outbreak of this war whatsoever. It is an attempt at considering and understanding the origin of this war as a European problem. It is not striving to ‘de-Germanize’ the war but to ‘Europeanize’ it.”

“Wer meint in meinem Buch einen Freispruch für die deutsche Staatsführung damals zu erlesen ist auf dem falschen Weg. . . . Das Buch spricht die deutschen überhaupt nicht von einer starken und großen Mitverantwortung an den Ausbruch dieses Krieges frei, sondern versucht die Entstehung dieses Krieges als europäisches Problem zu verstehen und zu betrachten. Es ist ein Versuch die Geschichte dieses Krieges nicht zu ‘entdeutschen’ sondern zu europäisieren.Christopher Clark

Germany never initiated nor started this war in the first place: Austria-Hungary did! So, why were the Allies (France in particular) so keen at accusing and humiliating Germany when France, Britain, Russia, Serbia, Austria-Hungary and the U.S. should have also been held accountable? Why Germany?

DBP_1988_1378_Made_in_GermanyTo answer this question, we need to review the geopolitical circumstances that transformed Prussia from a fractured kingdom (post Napoleonic wars) to a united German nation. How was Germany able to accumulate so much wealth from 1850 to 1914? Germany’s industrial strength was nothing short of an “Industrial Miracle.” Despite the fact that this Industrial Revolution started 100 years later than in Britain, the Netherlands and Flemish (north) Belgium, by 1900, Germany had become Europe’s number one economy. How did it happen?Clipboard_Image 008_F

The quintessential reason for Germany’s industrial revival (1871-1900) was the establishment of a German Currency (Mark) backed by Gold! Germany’s national wealth Clipboard_Image 014was rapidly created because their gold backed currency was not borrowed from central banks. This is geopolitically and geofinancially crucial because both (private) Bank of England (BoE) and newly created (private) U.S. Federal Reserve (1913 in Jekyll Island) did not have “monetary control” over Germany. As a nation, Germany was free to issue interest free money. Just like Adolf Hitler did with Germany’s development of what would become the world’s finest Autobahn (highway) network, Germany’s “interest free” money speeded up the expansion of its industrial wealth.

Germany’s late nineteen century industrialization was also speeded up thanks to:

  • The 1832 creation of a Zollverein (customs union) that promoted free trade between all German States
  • The 1870 German defeat over France and Otto von Bismarck‘s 1871 creation of a united Germany (from its initial 25 German-speaking states, city-states and duchies) that  stimulated its industrialization even further
  • The new politically united Germany could now exploit the rich iron-fields of Lorraine taken from France
  • The development of a national railway network especially after 1830. By 1850 Germany had constructed half as much as Britain and twice as much as France
  • The extraction of coal from the Silesian, Rhineland and Ruhr fields
  • Germany becoming Europe’s leading steel-producing nation in the late 19th century
  • The emergence of larger companies such as Alfred Krupp (railway, locomotives and armament production) and Werner Siemens

___Geopolitics_Afraid.of.GermanyIncidentally, the 23rd of August 1887 marked the birth of Made in Germany: A trademark law from the “Merchandise Marks Act” imposed by Britain on all German imported goods, which had to bear the Made in Germanylabel. Britain’s obvious intention was to downgrade German products as of “lesser quality” thus “lesser price,” which, as we know, turned out in Germany’s favo(u)r!

We are beginning to see how German currency (gold Mark) and German economy lead us again to the central banksters! London, New York and Paris did not like Germany issuing free money and feared (France especially) the threat that such an economic powerhouse could cause!  Winston Churchill, appointed First Lord of the Admiralty before the start of World War I, would eventually make this revealing tatement:

Clipboard_Image 011_F“You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism but against the economic strength of the German people, which must be smashed once and for all, regardless whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest“. —Winston Churchill

In part 10 of this series, we shall see how French Premier Minister Georges Clémenceau was instrumental into forging the disastrous Treaty of Versailles that would eventually “humiliate” and “flatten” Germany not only economically but also as a nation.

 Bruno P. Gebarski

Further reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (Part 9)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (Part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

Leave a comment

Filed under Central Banking, France, Germany, Prussia, USA, WWI

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)

German citizens are being coerced by the Establishment, the mainstream media and their own government to “willingly” accept a societal genocide or be labeled as right intolerant extremists, racists and even Nazis. This emotional „tour de force” could have never been possible without the backup of mainstream media propaganda. “On the ground”, migrant campaigns are structured with a push and pull migration strategy:

  • Push Strategy: NGOs push migrants to leave their countries of origin with incentives such as free transportation, prospect of better financial and employment opportunities, traveling tips in form of printed and digital material and even free smartphones upon arrival.  Migrant support to be found at site such as: Welcome To Europe w2eu.info, Watchthemed and WatchTheMed-Alarmphone.
  • Pull Strategy: NGOs and profit oriented organizations such as Amnesty International, Caritas and ORS “pull” migrants upon arrival with groups like Fluchhelfer encouraging EU citizens to illegally smuggle migrants into their country.

Remember unsavory George Soros’ reply to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban? “His [Viktor Orban] plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the  [migrants] as an obstacle, . . . [o]ur plan treats the protection of  [migrants] as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.” To complete Soros’ statement just add Dr. Thomas P.M. Barnett’s “mingling of races” geopolitical diatribe: “In Europe a light-brown race would emerge this way with an average intelligence quotient of 90 – ideal working slaves. . . . [I]rrational people who will fight against this mingling of races. . . . [W]e should kill them.”  As a reader you now should have an obvious overview of what is happening to our European Continent under massive attack.Clipboard_Image 006_F

George Soros’ Welcome to Europe (w2eu.info) platform states: “For freedom of movement: Independent information for refugees and migrant coming to Europe” but also “We welcome all travelers on their difficult trip and wish you all a good journey” and “Because freedom of movement is everybody’s right.”

Clipboard Image (14)_F

Sky Finds ‘Handbook’ For EU-Bound Migrants: “Refugees arriving in Greece on people smugglers’ boats are given a ‘migrants handbook’ packed with tips, maps, phone numbers and advice about getting across Europe. . . . The ‘rough guide’ is written in Arabic and contains phone numbers of organizations which might help refugees making the journey, such as the Red Cross and UNHCR. Among those behind the booklet are organizations called WatchTheMed-Alarmphone and w2eu, which means ‘Welcome To Europe.'” http://live.w2eu.info/category/germany/ gives additional and updated information on most (traveling and arriving) issues faced by migrants.

Clipboard Image (4)_FSonia, who did not want to give her surname, is a volunteer with WatchTheMed and told Sky News: ‘Activists from our network distribute the guides for free in Turkey’. The guide is distributed to refugees as they come ashore on the Aegean Islands and in Athens and other Greek cities. She added that other leaflets about safety at sea were distributed to would be migrants before they set out on their journeys with advice on what to do if they get into trouble on the water. The guide Sky News found also contained a 24-hour hotline number for migrants to call so volunteers can then pass their details to the relevant coastguard. ‘We are a big group of about 100 people’ she said. ‘We are based across Europe and North Africa.’ The pocket-sized guide has a handy map of Europe detailing the areas boats tend to land in. Marked in red are what it describes as ‘detention/reception/screening sites.'”

Clipboard_Image 007_F

Fluchthelfer.in or in English “Become an escape agent” is a German platform that encourages European citizens to break the constitutional laws of their countries’ sovereignty to “become an escape agent.” The German intro video of two and a half minutes features a white elderly couple driving and discussing the smuggling of a refugee inside the EU.  The elderly gentleman replies to his wife: “What we are doing here is not quite legal.” Fluchthelfer.in is an internet platform that also gives Migrants “the latest information” on lots of different legal and “not so legal tips and tricks” on how to “manage arrival” into their country of destination.

ORS Services, a Swiss company running migrant reception centers, is doing well. Run by London-based private equity firm Equistone Partners Europe Ltd, an affiliate of the Rothschild-owned Barclays Bank, which is considered to be the most influential financial institutions in the world.  German economist Wolfang Freisleben has described Barclays Bank as ‘Rothschilds slaughtership’. “It [ORS Services] now operates in Germany and Austria and recorded $99 million in revenue last year. ORS Service has thrived on Europe’s inability to cope with the refugee crisis.”

Clipboard_Image 005_FSilvia Wirnberger breaks down a report on Caritas: An organization helping the poor and needy (one would think) or a profit center belonging to the Catholic Church and mostly financed by German and Austrian taxpayers’ money? To most Austrians and Germans Caritas sounds “altruistic and generous” until one starts digging a big deeper! Caritas is an organization that churned out 712 Million EUR of mostly German and Austrian taxpayers’ money plus diverse government grants and state support. Caritas Austria gets a daily allowance of up to €77 for the care of a minor unaccompanied refugee. Austrian Caritas Secretary Klaus Schwertner claims that “similar care of Austrian children runs from €150 to €300 per day! He demands that the daily rates for refugee children should therefore be urgently increased to be able to ensure an ‘adequate and age-appropriate car.’ Caritas may well be a profit oriented organization disguising itself as an “altruistic Catholic institution.”

€300 daily allowance or €109K per year and per child? How can a German social worker survive on a €20K (per annum) income when having to entertain apartment, food, expenses and children going to school? As a footnote it is interesting to notice that the Industrial Revolution never took place in Catholic countries (Portugal, Spain, Italy and France) but in the Protestant ones (England, Germany, Flemish Belgium and The Netherlands). German Philosopher Max Weber: Die Protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus; The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is a must read if you have not done so yet.

German pharmaceutical industry is expecting EUR 13 billion additional business through products such as hepatitis C medical preparations with daily medication costs of an Iphone and a family house by the end of the treatment. Source: Udo Ulfkotte; Frubi TV | The Business of the (Rothschild) asylum industry

Udo Ulfkotte compares Siemens, the German industrial giant and its €70 Billion turnover with subsidiaries in 160 countries, to the national German social and asylum industries that represents a yearly turnover of €140 billion with a 2.5 million workforce. Compare those figures to the 700.000 workers the German automobile industry employs and it sure looks like the German governing coalition seems much more interested in financing the “misery business” than the manufacturing sector.

As a final thought let’s notice that the 3.000 German Mosques including Muslim clubs and Muslim associations have not shown much sign of “providing help” to the bulk of Muslim Migrants pouring in into Germany? Why? Udo Ulfkotte: “They prefer to have costs picked up by the unbelievers.”

In the German article: No solidarity for the refugees [migrants] (Keine Solidarität für die Flüchtlinge), Ali Ertan Toprak, Federal Chairman of the German Kurdish Association, is “proud of the fact that thousands of people have volunteered to welcome the refugees in their local communities. . . . In the administration of the [migrant] crisis Toprak observes that the Islamic associations and clubs have completely disappeared, something Toprak finds incomprehensible since 38% of the migrants are coming from Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Iran and Turkey (all Moslem countries).” This should not be a surprise since five of the wealthiest Gulf Nations: Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain have so far refused to take a single Syrian refugee.

Lots of institutions will derive profit from the migrant crisis: Health, pharma, food, larger corporation and politicians except for the German average working citizen who is forced to swallow an expensive pill while keeping his mouth shut for the better or for the worst.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Further Reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, Fascism, Geopolitics, George Soros, Geostrategy, Germany, Migrant, NWO, Refugees, Syria, USA

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part seven)

Let’s briefly review the legal difference between Migrant and Refugees in order to assess the present German crisis and avoid being swayed by ongoing western mainstream media propaganda.

“[A] Refugee [is a person who is] forced to leave [his] country because [he is] at risk of, or ha[s] experienced persecution. The concerns of refugees are human rights and safety, not economic advantage. They leave behind their homes, most or all of their belongings, family members and friends. Some are forced to flee with no warning and many have experienced significant trauma or been tortured or otherwise ill-treated. The journey to safety is fraught with hazard and many refugees risk their lives in search of protection. They cannot return unless the situation that forced them to leave improves.“

“A migrant is a person who makes a conscious choice to leave their country to seek a better life elsewhere. Before they decide to leave their country, migrants can seek information about their new home, study the language and explore employment opportunities. They can plan their travel, take their belongings with them and say goodbye to the important people in their lives. They are free to return home at any time if things don’t work out as they had hoped, if they get homesick or if they wish to visit family members and friends left behind.”

Some Migrants coming from Hungary and arriving in Austria even hire taxis: “Before this all started, [taxi] drivers would be lucky to earn 150 EUR in a 12-hour shift in Vienna. I don’t mind waiting sometimes five or six hours at a time because I know I will get a fare.” . . .  “Here at the Nickelsdorf crossing point, a long line of between 130 and 140 taxis snakes back from the border, waiting for the next train to disgorge its latest cargo of people on the Hungarian side, who then walk across.” Refugees do not hire cabs; they usually are content with food and shelter: those migrants are on the move for financial reasons.

1,2 to 1.5 million refugees migrants were “invited” by Kanzlerin Angela Merkel after unilaterally opening the German borders on September the fourth of 2015. Many German citizens are still wondering how could the leadership of one of the most powerful economies in the world do such an insane act of treason towards its own citizens?  Angela Merkel doesn’t have the legal (constitutional) right to remove Germany‘s national borders and jeopardize its sovereignty! What could be the reasons that led reluctant Hegemon Angela Merkel to become one of the worst post WWII self-destructing German kamikaze?

  • Corruption/Money incentives?
  • Possible (death) threats?
  • Possible promotion as United Nations Secretary-General or President of the European Council?
  • Childless German citizen succumbing to the renowned „pride“of the German holocaust shame?

A million of displaced citizens searching asylum for better economic conditions do not qualify as “refugees” as the western (German) propaganda would have us to believe but as migrants. Should we perceive this migrant crisis as the “sovereign protection” of the German citizens or the global protection of the Migrants?

Global oligarch Zionist cover-up “philanthropist” and “donor” George Soros clarifies the issue:  [Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s] plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees [migrants] as an obstacle, . . . [o]ur plan treats the protection of refugees [migrants] as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.” George Soros, a global citizen worth to be matched to U.S. geopolitical psychopath Dr. Thomas P.M. Barnett’s own words: “. . . In Europe a light-brown race would emerge this way with an average intelligence quotient of 90 – ideal working slaves. . . . [I]rrational people who will fight against this mingling of races. . . . [W]e should kill them.”

It is more than legitimate to suggest that migrants did cause the bulk of the sexual crimes committed on Germany’s 2015’s New Years Eve celebrations. Countless reports of sexual attacks and crimes were registered in Germany’s largest cities.

Mobs of nonwhite invader [migrants] took part in mass sex attacks in towns and cities all across Germany, Austria, and even Switzerland on New Year’s Eve; it has emerged as the controlled media’s censorship of refugee-crime collapses in the face of Internet and social media.”

  • Berlin
  • Bielefeld: where 150 “North African” refugee-criminals sexually harassed women on the main street and in a discotheque in the town;
  • Cologne
  • Düsseldorf
  • Frankfurt am Main (there is also a Frankfurt an der Oder)
  • Freiburg: In Freiburg there were a number of violent attacks on homosexuals in the city center. According to police reports, a large mob of refugee-criminals attacked, punched, and kicked the homosexuals outside one of their clubs in the town.
  • Hamburg
  • Leipzig
  • Munich: where groups of migrants harassed women in the city center on New Year’s Eve
  • Stuttgart

Austria: Salzburg: According to the Austrian OE24 news service, there were at least seven sex attacks in Salzburg, where there is a large invader center. And the list goes on and on: Austria: Vienna; Finland: Helsinki; Sweden: Kalmar, Switzerland: Zurich!

According German Journalist Gerhardt Wienewski, epic migration year 2015 represents a 1.2 to 1.5 million migrants  i n v a s i o n  for Germany. Not only should this invasion be analyzed as a potential societal and sociological suicide but considered in terms of military strategy.  You might think: over the top conspiracy theory? I thought “may be this time” Gerhard Wienewski did go an “extra geopolitical mile” but let’s reflect on Gerhard and Kelly M. Greenhill’s brilliant military analysis and consider this migration in military terms:

  • Occupation of the targeted country
  • Operational military base occupation
  • Weapon of mass migration
  • Forced Migration as “Non-Military” instrument of coercion
  • Extract political, military and/or economic concessions from target states
  • Hypocrisy costs via NGOs “protecting migrant’s safety”
  • 75 to 80 percent of migrants are young adult males
  • German Spring” 2016 and sexual crimes: women as the spoil of war

In Kelly M. Greenhill’s book “Weapons of Mass Migration”, Kelly examines the idea of how nations and non-state actors use forced migration as a non-military instrument of coercion. According Kelly M. Greenhill: “If traditional military coercion involves the use of threats or the use of force in order to extract changes in behavior, engineered migration by extension entails the threatened or the actual mass movement of people in order to extract political, military, and/or economic concessions from target states. Quite often this a tool that’s used by actors that are, relatively speaking, weaker than their targets and the threat to use demographic bombs or use people as weapons can help, unfortunately, level the playing field and give weak actors a sense of leverage to pressure target states in a way that allows them to punch above their weight from a strict capabilities standpoint. Unfortunately, this means that some of the world’s most vulnerable populations end up being pawns in this game between states and their targets.”

In part eight of this series, I will attempt to show how Germany and Austria have become the two targeted culprits of a vicious Western (U.S.) mass migration attack.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Further Reading

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)
  • Will the abrupt change of U.S. policy towards Syria prove the demise of NATO’s Western Alliance?
  • The Six-Step U.S. Strategy For Violent Regime Takeover

Additional Sources of information in English:

Additional Source of information in German:

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, Fascism, Geopolitics, George Soros, Germany, Migrant, NWO, Refugees, USA