U.S. Empire of Chaos Loses its Footing and Attempts to Topple Democratically Elected Philippine President Rodrigo Roa Duterte: Part One

Ferdinand Magellan Trip Around The World

On the 16^th of March 1521, Spaniard explorer Ferdinand Magellan, sailing from Spain, reached the archipelago of what was to become the Philippines. With the colonization that followed, the Philippines became part of the Spanish Empire, ending in 1898 when the U.S. Deep State targeted Cuba’s local gold (sugar) thanks to the 15th February 1898 dubious explosion of the U.S.S. Maine battleship in the harbor of Havana. This terrorist act did trigger the Spanish-American war and the beginning of the American Colonial Era of the Philippines. The Spanish-American war was followed by the 1899—1992 Philippine—American War and the Commonwealth period that was designed as a transitional administration in preparation for the country’s full achievement of independence.

Rodrigo Roa Duterte: Philippines 16th President

Rodrigo Roa Duterte, born in 1945 in Maasin, Southern Leyte, a law graduate, with a seven times Davos City’s Mayor proven track record, became the 16th President of the Philippines. Rodrigo Roa Duterte presents a potential threat to the Washington neocon leaders as he turned towards China and Russia and waved a French farewell “au revoir” to the Washington neocon thugs. The U.S. Empire of Chaos does not take this sort of loyalty shift lightly and many of us know what the Washington entourage is capable of when countries stop toeing the Washington neoconservative fascist line.

China President Xi Jinping with Philippine President Dutarte during official in China (October 2016)

During an October 2017 visit to Beijing China, Philippine President Rodrigo Roa Duterte, accompanied by 250 Philippine business leaders, made some remarkable comments that paved the way to what he called “a new commercial alliance as relations with longtime ally Washington deteriorate . . .In this venue, your honors, in this venue, I announce my separation from the United States.” Duterte told Chinese and Philippine business people, to applause, at a forum in the Great Hall of the People attended by Chinese Vice Premier Zhang. “Both in military, not maybe social, but economics also, America has lost.” Furthermore, President Dutarte added “For as long as I am here, do not treat us like a doormat because you’ll be sorry.” He added. “I will not speak with you. I can always go to China.”

Exercises in the disputed South China Sea have been put on hold, and 107 US troops operating drones surveilling Muslim militants will also have to leave the country soon, the Philippines Defense chief said. President Rodrigo Duterte said he wants an ongoing US-Philippine amphibious beach landing drill to be the last in his six-year presidency, with plans to halt all the 28 military exercises carried out with US forces every year.“This year would be the last,” Duterte pledged on Friday in Davao in the southern Philippines, AP reported. Dutarte also made some crude comments towards (former US. President) Barack Obama: the outspoken Philippines leader said his US counterpart Barack Obama, whom he has previously publicly called a “son-of-a-b***h,” should “go to hell.” Experts say the Philippines president’s plans to limit the presence of US troops will thwart Washington’s intention to beef up US forces in Southeast Asia in order to counter China. “President Duterte’s shoot-from-the-hip style of parochial democracy is deeply troubling,” Carl Thayer, an expert on the South China Sea, told AP. “If Duterte moves to curtail US rotational military presence from bases in the Philippines, this would undermine the US ability to deter China not only in defense of Philippines sovereignty, but regional security as well.”

Meanwhile the warmongering U.S. Empire of Chaos is remodeling Guantánamo Bay (Cuba) facilities and planning to invest a mere USD 500 million in new construction, from which USD 250 million for the hospital facilities: five additional beds: USD 50 million per bed.” Not bad for a Zimbabwe money printing style nation with twenty trillion USD debt!

Things are not doing well for the Anglo-American elite, The Bretton Woods Reserve Currency USD is losing its grip on an international community beginning to create and establish alternative competing financial products and institutions:

• BRICS: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa as an alternative to the Bretton Woods Western nations’ USD, GBP, EUR and ¥EN
• SCO: Shanghai Cooperation Organizationas as alternative to NATO
• AIIB: Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank as alternative to the IMF
• CIPS: Chinese inter-banking payment system as alternative to SWIFT
• Shanghai Gold Exchange as alternative to the fraudulent financial paper markets of London and New York
• CFFEX: China’s New China Financial Future Exchange

The AIIB or Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank is a major development in the international world of finances and a direct threat to US Dollar based institutions such as the Federal Reserve (FED), the IMF (International Monetary Fund), the World Bank, the Bank of England (BoE), the European Central Bank (ECB), the Bank of Japan (BoJ), and last but not least the Bank of International Settlements in Basel (BIS.)

Many of us may not have heard of the AIIB, but let’s not kid ourselves, The AIIB is a major financial threat to the 1944 Bretton Woods International Reserve Currency agreements. No less than 57 countries contributed to the start of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank; among others: The Philippines, France, Germany, Switzerland, Britain, South Korea, Canada, Belgium, Hungary, Ireland and Hong Kong.

But let’s get back to the Philippines, three archipelagos became of strategic importance for the geopolitical control of the U.S. Empire: the Philippines, Taiwan and Japan. As a footnote let’s not forget that following World War II, Japan and Germany remained to this very day two U.S. vassal states and US-occupied territories…

To be followed….

Bruno P. Gebarski for Geopoliticalnews.wordpress.com

 

 

 

Ukraine 22nd and 23rd of February 2014 U.S. Coup d’État | Viktor A. Yushchenko | Viktor F. Yanukovych | EU & U.S. NeoCons: Petro O. Poroshenko

To this day the bulk of German citizenry, spoon fed by German western propagandists such as Der Spiegel, Focus, Bild, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Die Welt and Süd Deutsche Zeitung, to name just a few, believes that Russian President Vladimir Putin is responsible for the Ukraine conflict. U.S. CIA fueled German drumbeat propaganda is loud and clear: As former (German) mainstream media journalist and whistle blower Udo Ulfkotte once said: “You either publish what is ‘expected of you’ or you’re pronto out of a job!” Welcome to (German) 21^st century western neocon journalism and this, mind you, on both sides of the pond!

A few golden nuggets preceding this Western Ukrainian Eurasian coup d’état ought to be reviewed. Here are some of the events that led to the climax of this well orchestrated western geopolitical fascist masquerade!

In his article:  “CIA: Undermining and Nazifying Ukraine Since 1953,” Wayne Madsen writes: “The recent declassification of over 3800 documents by the Central Intelligence Agency provides detailed proof that since 1953 the CIA operated two major programs intent on not only destabilizing Ukraine but Nazifying it with followers of the World War II Ukrainian Nazi leader Stepan Bandera.  The CIA programs spanned some four decades. Starting as a paramilitary operation that provided funding and equipment for such anti-Soviet Ukrainian resistance groups as the Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council (UHVR); its affiliates, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), all Nazi Banderists. The CIA also provided support to a relatively anti-Bandera faction of the UHVR, the ZP-UHVR, a foreign-based virtual branch of the CIA and British MI-6 intelligence services. The early CIA operation to destabilize Ukraine, using exile Ukrainian agents in the West who were infiltrated into Soviet Ukraine, was codenamed Project Aerodynamic.

Ukraine’s dramatic November and December 2004 Orange Revolution

Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko

Six months after the November December 2004 Orange Revolution, led by Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych, the Ukraine, and its Western-leaning president Viktor Andriyovych Yushchenko and charismatic Prime Minister Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko, who later ended up in jail for corruption, was on a firm Western-oriented course! Reforms however remained slow. While Viktor A. Yushchenko was celebrated as a hero, his leadership started drawing disapproval. The Kyiv Post was then urging its readers to “resist Orange depression.”

 

“In December 2004 US Congressman Ron Paul of Texas, a libertarian Republican and critic of the Iraq War, echoed President George W Bush’s words that ‘Any election (in Ukraine), if there is one, ought to be free from any foreign influence.’ He continued, ‘I agree with the president wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, it seems that several U.S. government agencies saw things differently and sent U.S. taxpayer dollars into Ukraine in an attempt to influence the outcome’” (Ron Paul 2004).

In late august 2006, President Viktor Andriyovych Yushchenko was forced to appoint Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych as prime minister after his own allies, including Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko failed to form a government. Interesting to notice that both Viktor A. Yushchenko and Yulia V. Tymoshenko accused each other of corruption!  Finally on the 7th of February 2010, Viktor F. Yanukovych, leader of the Region’s Party, won the Ukrainian presidential election with 48,95%, against 45,47% of the votes for Yulia V. Tymoshenko.

On the 22^nd and 23^rd of February 2014 and under the leadership and the baton of U.S. American neo con “diplomats:” Victoria Nuland and Jeffrey Pyatt, the Ukrainian Verkhovna Rada staged a coup d’état on its Ukrainian people: The Ukrainian parliament forced its president Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych to resign and replaced him with the former boss of its secret services Oleksandr Turchynov. The Ukrainian constitution that used to be parliamentary was repealed and transformed into a presidential type of régime similar to the United States of America: What a coincidence!

 

Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko

Democratically elected President Viktor F. Yanukovych was impeached and removed from office. Former Prime Minister and billionaire Yulia V. Tymoshenko (undergoing a seven-year prison sentence) was released and Oleksandr Valentynovych Turchynov was proclaimed acting (sic) president. The whole neo colonialism western bloody power grab (coup d’état) was then celebrated by Western Powers and its media propaganda stooges, under the control of the CIA dutifully filtering (pun intended) and spewing distorted information to its gullible smartphones hypnotized, sodomized, drugged up, decadent and morally lawless western zombie citizens, as a “return to democracy” (sic). Finally, on Mai the 25^th of 2014, Ukrainian corrupt chocolate magnate and oligarch Petro Oleksiyovych Poroshenko was “elected” President of the Ukraine! But it is all the fault of Russian “war mongering” Vladimir Putin right?

Orange Revolution 2.0

Memorable U.S. Assistant Secretary of State to Secretary of State John Kerry Victoria Nuland is your typical American bubblegum-chewing mafia doll! Some sort of a neo-colonialist reincarnated neo-con cow-girl riding high the tsunami waves of U.S. and NATO’s Eurasian expansion! In a public speech, our Washington’s cloned female warmonger made the following fascist hypocritical and propagandist NATO statement: “Since the declaration of Ukrainian independence in 1991, the United States supported the Ukrainians in the development of democratic institutions and skills in promoting civil society and a good form of government – all that is necessary to achieve the objectives of Ukraine’s European. We have invested more than 5 billion dollars to help Ukraine to achieve these and other goals. ” Victoria Nuland added: “The United States will continue to promote Ukraine to the future it deserves.”

Neo-Nazi Svoboda’s reelected leader: Oleh Tyahnybok

In his article: “There are No Neo-Nazis in Ukraine. And the Obama Administration does not support Fascists,” Prof Michel Chossudovsky’s writes: Svoboda is a Neo-Nazi Party, Ukraine’s fourth biggest party holding 36 seats out of 450 in parliament. They’re also part of the Alliance of European National Movements along with the BNP and Jobbik. Svoboda is supported directly by Washington.  This is Svoboda and the “Right Sector”: the Neo-Nazi group which led the “protest movement” in Ukraine. These Neo-Nazis are armed gunmen.”

Just in case you missed it, here is Princess Nuland’s encore: An oratorio of suave vocabulary finesse and rhetorical skills caught in a “Nulandgate-style” statement she made during a phone conversation with U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Jeffrey Pyatt (02:32):

• Nuland: “OK… one more wrinkle for you Geoff. I can’t remember if I told you this, or if I only told Washington this, that when I talked to Jeff Feltman [United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs] this morning, he had a new name for the UN guy Robert Serry did I write you that this morning?”
• Pyatt: “Yeah I saw that.”
• Nuland: “OK. He’s now gotten both [Robert] Serry and [UN Secretary General] Ban Ki-moon to agree that [Robert] Serry could come in Monday or Tuesday. So that would be great, I think, to help glue this thing and to have the UN help glue it and, you know, f**k the EU (02:32).”

“Meet the new (cold) war,” wrote Pepe Escobar in his editorial: The New US-Russia Cold War:  ”. . . Same as the old (cold) war. Same, but different. One day, it’s the myriad implications of Washington’s ‘pivoting’ to Asia – as in the containment of China. The next day, it’s the perennial attempt to box Russia in. Never a dull moment in the New Great Game in Eurasia.” Escobar thinks that “’F**k the EU’ is essentially directed towards Berlin and Klitschko, its key protégé. Washington sees this going nowhere, as Germany, after all, has been slowly building a complex energy-investment partnership with Russia.”

Private Blackwater/Academi mercenaries to the Neo Nazi U.S. rescue

An alleged report by Jeremy Scahill (Investigating journalist and author of Blackwater) revealed that the largest mercenary army in the world, Blackwater (later called Xe Services and more recently “Academi”) clandestine intelligence services was sold to the multinational Monsanto. Blackwater was renamed in 2009 after becoming famous in the world with numerous reports of abuses in Iraq, including massacres of civilians. It remains the largest private contractor of the U.S. Department of State “security services,” that practices state terrorism by giving the government the opportunity to deny it.

About 400 elite mercenaries from the notorious US private security firm Academi (formerly Blackwater) were taking part in the Ukrainian military operation against anti-government protesters in southeastern regions of the country, German media reported. Der Bild am Sonntag (The Photo on Sunday) newspaper, citing a source in intelligence circles, wrote that Academi employees were involved in the Kiev military crackdown on pro-autonomy activists in the  Donetsk region. German Intelligence Service (BND: Bundesnachrichtendienst)  informed Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government about the mercenaries’ participation in the operation, the paper said, RIA Novosti reported.

Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet during a telephone conversation with Catherine Ashton Foreign Affairs and Security Policy discuss Ukraine over the phone and Umas Paet reporting the snipers shooting on both sides policemen and people on the street. Again this is strong evidence of the internal meddling by the United States, European Union and NATO into the sovereign affairs of the Ukraine.

2014 March the 10^th:  A 33 tons U.S. gold heist

http://iskra-news.info/news/segodnja_nochju_iz_borispolja_v_ssha_strarto…

At 2 a.m. this morning an unmarked transport plane was on the runway at Borispol Airport. According to airport staff, before the plane came to the airport, four trucks and two Volkswagen minibuses arrived, all the truck license plates missing. Fifteen people in black uniforms, masks, and body armor stepped out, some armed with machine guns. They loaded the plane with more than 40 heavy boxes. After that a mysterious men arrived and entered the plane. All loading was done in a hurry. The plane took off on an emergency basis. Those who saw this mysterious special operation immediately notified the airport officials, who told the callers not to meddle in other people’s affairs.  Later a returned call from a senior official of the former Ministry of Income and Fees reported that tonight, on the orders of one of the new leaders of Ukraine, the United States had taken custody of all the gold reserves in Ukraine.

But as Chris Powell, Secretary and Treasurer of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc. writes:

“The first rule of mainstream financial journalism and particularly financial journalism about gold is never to put a specific critical question about the monetary metal to any of the primary participants in the gold market, central banks. That is, nearly all gold market reporting is, by design, irrelevant distraction at best, disinformation at worst.”

 “The true location and disposition of national gold reserves are secrets far more sensitive than the location and disposition of nuclear weapons.”

Maybe the gold looted by the U.S. will reimburse some of the costs neocon Victoria Nuland and her Ukrainian stooges have made in the first place! A western coup d’état that is aimed at separating Europe but particularly Germany from its main eastern trade partner Russia but also indirectly China.

Bruno P. Gebarski

 

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and US-led “Terror Management” | NATO’s Totalitarian Expansion | Neo-Conservatism | NGOs and Color Revolutions

In the previous blog article, we reviewed how post WWI U.S. replaced the British Empire with the start of the private Federal Reserve and post WWII 1944 Bretton Woods agreements with the establishment of the U.S. Dollar as world currency; the 1971 de-pegging of the USD from gold, the 1973 Rockefeller’s crude oil quadrupled price heist also known as “Oil Crisis”, the 1989 Berlin wall events that reunited Germany and triggered the destruction of the Union of the Socialist States of Russia (USSR) and the promise the United States made to the Soviet Union (now Russia) not to use German Reunification as an opportunity for NATO‘s expansion.

Totalitarian Democracies | Neocolonialism | Color Revolutions

Why would the United States of America embarrass its Western European allies and break its promise? A few months later, on March the 12^th of 1999, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland became full members of NATO. In 2004, on March the 29^th, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia joined the ranks of NATO, and last but not least, Albania and Croatia in 2009!

Color Revolution is a neocolonialism form of 21^st century warfare! I would like to suggest color revolutions as a  cyber- or net-centric digital warfare form of the old fashioned coup d’état. Why digital? Because the U.S. army, transnational crime organizations and NGOs, among others, use social media platforms such as Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, ask.fm, Tumblr in a highly sophisticated and coordinated manner (flashmobs) to disseminate their propaganda via social swarming:

Source: USACAC.Army

“Tweeting the Arab Spring? That’s so 2010. A future tactic in cyber-based-information warfare is built upon mobile-media wielding e-citizen soldiers employing social swarming tactics to overwhelm a system, a decision maker, or a critical node. These mobile networks are vital to starting and maintaining cyber-based insurgency, drawing physical and moral strength from super-empowered individuals, while also using super-connected-individual networks to spread information, move undetected, and muster support, constantly one step ahead of authorities. It is possible for this swarm to move from the online world into the real world where violence may ensue.” (source: usacac.army) It is one of the many venues Western totalitarian democracies (such as the U.S. and its EU vassal state) use. Totalitarian democracy is a term that F. William Engdahl coined in his challenging book: “Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order.”

In the article “Neo-Cons for human rights” Tony Cartalucci makes a very insightful statement about Neo-Conservatism: “As counter-intuitive as it may sound, a great deal of Neo-Conservatives are deeply involved in human rights. One may wonder in what capacity, since this war mongering clique of big-business connected scoundrels is renowned for its role in the most unprecedented, flagrant, and grievous human rights violations in American history.”

The United States of America, NATO and the European Union use some of the following tools and tactics (alphabetically ordered)

• Balkanisation of target countries and regions
• Central Banking such as the Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, Bank of England (BoE) and Bank of Japan (BoJ)
• Color Revolutions: Serbia/Kosovo, Georgia and Ukraine
• Media propaganda via Western Press under U.S. CIA control
• NATO as an international tool of neocolonialism expansion
• Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
• Social Media propaganda (Kosovo and Egypt) used by the military
• Social Swarming military techniques (flachmobs, e-citizens)
• War on Terror: a fictitious enemy that can be created any where any time with U.S. | Western | Saudi | Israeli army subsidiaries such as Al Qaeda, ISIS, IS, ISIL, Daesh or Blackwater: One of the many (170) private mercenaries firms employed by the U.S. during the war in Iraq.

to expand their geopolitical reach, sphere of “influence” and financial “thiefdom.” Just like the old communist iron curtain exemplified by the Berlin Wall, a similar “EU-Financial Wall” has been raised with the single European currency. As Prof. Dr. Wilhelm Hankel used to say: “Nineteen men of different heights and statures cannot expect a tailor to cut them one single suit to fit them all!” This is what the EUR is supposed to be; in the long term the EUR can only “survive” under the terms of financial fascism and slavery countries such as Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and France are already experiencing.

“Colored revolutions always occur in a nation with strategic, natural resources: gas, oil, military bases and geopolitical interests. And they also take place in countries with socialist-leaning, anti-imperialist governments. The movements promoted by US agencies in those countries are generally anti-communist, anti-socialist, pro-capitalist and pro-imperialist.” writes international lawyer and consultant Eva Golinger In her article “Colored Revolutions, a New Form of Régime Change Made in the USA:”

“In 1983, the strategy of overthrowing inconvenient governments and calling it ‘democracy promotion’ was born. Through the creation of a private ‘foundations’ also known as Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs)” such as:

• Canva: Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies
• Albert Einstein Institution (AEI): Advancing freedom through non violent action”
• Freedom House: 75 years championing democracy
• International Center for Non-Violent Conflict (ICNC): “Nonviolent conflict is a way for people to fight for rights”
• International Republican Institute (IRI): “Advancing Democracy Worldwide” (Board of directors: John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Brent Scowcroft)
• National Democratic Institute (NDI): “Support and strengthen democratic institutions worldwide”
• National Endowment for Democracy (NED): “Supporting freedom around the world freedom, justice, self-determination, and accountable government, through the use of civil resistance”
• Project for the New American Century (PNAC)
• USAID: “We partner to end extreme poverty and promote resilient, democratic societies while advancing our security and prosperity”

” . . . The Washington régime filters funding and strategic aid to political parties and groups abroad that promotes U.S. agenda in nations with insubordinate governments.” Golinger goes on to say: “Behind all these ‘foundations’ and ‘institutes’ is the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the financial branch of the Department of State. Today, USAID has become a critical part of the security, intelligence and defense axis in Washington. In 2009, the Inter-agency Counterinsurgency Initiative became official doctrine in the US. Now, USAID is the principal entity that promotes the economic and strategic interests of the US across the globe as part of counterinsurgency operations. Its departments dedicated to transition initiatives, reconstruction, conflict management, economic development, governance and democracy are the main venues through which millions of dollars are filtered from Washington to political parties, NGOs, student organizations and movements that promote US agenda worldwide. Wherever a coup d’état, a colored revolution or a regime change favorable to US interests occurs, USAID and its flow of dollars is there.”

 So what are color revolutions? According Golinger: “. . . The procedure is often the same. Sponsored students and youth movements lead the way with a new face, attracting others to join in as though it were the fashion, the cool thing to do. There’s always a logo, a color, a marketing strategy. In Serbia, the group OTPOR, which led the overthrow of Slobodan Milosevic, hit the streets with t-shirts, posters and flags boasting a fist in black and white, their symbol of resistance. In Ukraine, the logo remained the same, but the color changed to orange. In Georgia, it was a rose-colored fist, and in Venezuela, instead of the closed fist, the hands are open, in black and white, to add a little variety.”

Vladimir Putting stated: “Today almost un-contained hyper use of military force in international relations is plunging the world into an abyss of permanent conflicts.” Adds Russian General L. Ivashov: “Terrorism is simply a new type of war in order to install a unipolar world, a pretext to establish the rule of a world élite.”

Bruno P. Gebarski

U.S. President Barack Obama’s Visit to Hannover | Brexit: End of the Anglosphere or Chinese Russian Threat to the London/Washington Financial Fiat Money Lords?

The end of the Anglo sphere as written recently in a Financial Times article should be attributed to a real Russia | China (SCO: Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, AIIB: Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and SGE: Shanghai Gold Exchange) threat to the Anglo-American Bankster Cabal fiat money trail (USD, GBP, EUR and YEN) hegemony; but certainly not to Britain’s [Br]exit from the European Union!

Is this the reason why the Establishment sent its Washington minion to Hannover (Germany) to make sure that vassal state Europe (and its leader Kanzler Merkel) obeys and dances to the tact of the Washington geopolitical chanson and neocolonialism agenda?

The fact that Britain has extended a financial arm towards China’s SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) and AIIB (Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank) is a thorn in the flesh of the Washington Régime struggling to defend its post-1971 USD fiat paper currency with “sister-paper-notes” EUR, GBP and YEN: more money cover-ups for the mighty king-dollar that could soon be dethroned by a gold backed Chinese Yuan!

Mayor of London Boris Johnson was accused of: “. . . ‘dog-whistle racism’ after suggesting that the ‘part-Kenyan’ Barack Obama has an ‘ancestral dislike of the British empire’ . . . Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP, said President [Barack Obama] should ‘butt out’, accusing him of being the most anti-British American president in history: ‘Mercifully, he won’t be in office for much longer.’”

I’ve often coined U.S President Barack Hussein Obama as the “Kenyan Squatter” but wrongly so! President Barack Obama, according the most official data, would have been born in Kenya in 1961 (was his U.S. birthcertificate forged?) A short overview of Kenya’s history is now à propos: Germans arrived in 1885 but handed the costal lines of former Kenyan territory to the British in 1888. “According to record, Kenya didn’t exist until 1963, two years after Obama was born and probably 27 years after his father’s birth . . . How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that didn’t yet exist and was known as “British East Africa Protectorate?” Kenyan Squatter ought to be renamed as: British East African Protectorate Squatter: Minutes stand as corrected!

Barack Obama’s (and Merkel) plaidoyer for Britain to remain in a “strong EU” is such of hypocritical duplicity! The United States agree to a “Strong Europe”, while at the same time promoting (with the help of Britain and France) the genocide of Europe’s strongest economy with an organized, and NGO financed, migrant German genocide? Maybe President Obama just wanted to reassure himself that Germany’s destruction was well under way! Let’s bear in mind that part of Washington’s geopolitical credo is to make sure that a Russian German entente Cordiale and rapprochement never takes place:  It is classified by geopolitical observer George Friedman as one of U.S. top geopolitical threats for ongoing 21st century U.S. hegemony. It is also the reason why the U.S. has “destabilized” Ukraine and offered Europe a vile coup d’état with the help of Erik Prince’ private Blackwater | Academi mercenaries!

Consider Blackwater as the new privatized face of the U.S. war machine, a classified group of mercenaries that handles “special U.S. assignments” such as the “Baghdad Bloody Sunday.” Prince’s Blackwater, that was awarded over a $1 billion in contracts from the U.S. State Department, is presently under Fed’s investigation! In the meanwhile, Erik Prince, former owner of Blackwater, whom we shall revisit in future installments, turned his back on Washington after he was thrown under the bus! he now offers his services to China (mostly in Africa) via Frontier Service Group. Further more, Erik Prince’ private forces would now operate in Libya “for the stated purpose of stopping the flow of refugees to Europe. Libya is one of the main routes from migrants trying to enter Europe from eastern Africa and parts of the central Sahel region. Prince has also long been interested in raising private military force to battle Islamic militant groups in a variety of countries.” Very much counterproductive to the U.S. (British and French) destabilization program in Northern Africa, part of the Middle East, the Ukraine, Georgia, the seven “Stans” (Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) and now Germany! One can obviously see why Eric Prince’ undertakings would be considered by Washington’s rogue régime as two military “faux-pas.”

President Obama’s preaching against Brexit: What sort of duplicity and hypocrisy is this? Public Relation nonsense! Would the U.S. let itself have its constitution written in Venezuela, a country that has been additionally destroyed from within thanks to the back-up of a U.S. (led and financed) color revolution? Remember the 1992 uprising in Serbia? OTPOR was backed up by NGO’s (National Endowment for ‘Democracy’?) by the tune of millions? Wasn’t it the same logo that was found roughly 11 years later in the street of Cairo? A coincidence? I let you be the judge:

OTPUR/Serbia: US backed-up Color Revolution | Cairo: US backed-up Color Revolution

More (Obama/Merkel) propaganda: “And he [Obama] also recalled the devastating consequences of ‘intolerance and extreme nationalism’ that drenched Europe in blood during the 20th century. ‘In the last century, just twice in 30 years, the forces of empire and intolerance and extreme nationalism consumed this continent and cities like this one were largely reduced to rubble,’ Obama said.” When I read those lines, it reminds me of 70’s Soviet Union communist propaganda. Our “On tour” Obama neo-con must obviously promote that Britain remains in the fascist EU alliance: What else? Much easier to control: A single phone call to Jean-Claude Juncker!

Geert Wilders (Partij voor de Vrijheid – PVV, NL), Nigel Farage (British UKIP) or Marine Le Pen (French Front National) or German AFD (Alternative für Deutschland) are just a few popular voices coming from the people who are fed up with the fascist financial lords that have overtaken both sides of the Atlantic.

The danger in Europe and the U.S. is not Russia but our own brand of politician traitors such as Kanzler Angela Merkel, Barack Obama, Jean Claude Juncker, Martin Schulz, François Hollande and David Cameron:  these are the neo con fascists who are endangering the peace on our European Continent. Would Vladimir Putin behave the same way Berlin, Brussels and Washington do, we could be now in a full-fledged WWIII military conflict!

Bruno P. Gebarski

Western NATO and U.S.-led geopolitical duplicity (1949 — 2016) | MittelEuropa, Lebensraum | U.S. Vassal State Germany

The Telegraph Europe’s Editor Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse are either geopolitical slapstick comedians or two knuckleheads (dummköpfchen in German) who have lost their political common sense and sold their journalistic raison d’être to a Western never ending anti-Russian media propaganda. Their recent article:”Russia accused of clandestine funding of European parties” and “UK warns of ‘new Cold War’ as Kremlin seeks to divide and rule in Europe.” is an insult to the sound mind and an additional contribution to the debris of geopolitical waste.

Contrary to what vaudeville comics Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse report, the U.S. has never been interested in the welfare of the German and/or European people whatsoever: Quite the contrary! Germany has become U.S. (NATO) Central European’s dumping ground providing additional territorial space to nature’s oceanic buffer zone! The U.S. has turned our little European continent into a dangerous lethal playground: The result of an increasingly rogue and war mongering Washington régime. And no Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse, Russia did not annex Crimea. Please Gentlemen, do your homework, as we should expect from journalists doing their job accurately instead of the news presstitutes you’ve turned yourselves into.

Even German pro-U.S. propagandist “Der Spiegel” reported: Ukraine-Crisis:  400 U.S.-mercenaries from Academi [Blackwater] are fighting against separatists (Ukraine-Krise: 400 US-Söldner von Academi [Blackwater] kämpfen gegen Separatisten). Consider this hired Blackwater/Academi entity:  Positionened on rooftops, shooting both at police and public demonstrators. These US-based sniper elements were verified by Estonian Embassy translators. They appeared to have been hired by the Maidan Regime, supplied by the U.S. and Langley (CIA).

German “Der Spiegel” Western Propaganda

• Putin, the Dangerous Neighbor | Putin, der gefährliche Nachbarn
• Stop Putin Now! | Stoppt Putin Jetzt!
• Putin: the Arsonist/Firestarter | Putin, der Brandstifter
• Obama Super Star | Obama Super Star
• Obama, the World President | Obama, der Weltpräsident
• Obama, the Messiah Factor | Obama, Der Messias Faktor

Wasn’t it bubblegum-chewing Mafia doll Victoria Nuland who said in a leaked private foul-mouthed indiscretion to U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt: “F**k the EU. . . . I think Yats [Arseny Yatsenyuk] is the guy who’s got the economic experience. . . . “I’ve got a five billion USD budget?” Wasn’t it the same Victoria Nuland aiming at standing out in her political  career and sounding more macho, miserable and moronic than her male American counterparts? Wasn’t it German chancellor Angela Merkel who described Victoria Nuland’s remarks as “totally unacceptable”? How about the 33 tons of Ukraine central bank’s gold bullion removed, confiscated and stolen then quickly spirited back to New York for “Safe Keeping “and rehypothecation? All this for the sake of the United States “safeguarding” our European interests? Yeah sure!

Since 9/11, regardless of where U.S. agent provocateur has boots on the ground, chaos, destruction and squalor are left behind. In the name of “democracy”, self-created tailor-made terrorist schemes (Al Qaeda/ISIS/IS/ISIL/Daesh) have been applied to countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Mali, Yemen and now Germany (see migrant crisis parts three, four and five) leaving behind a destructive path of destabilization and destruction.

“Several months before the end of the war, General Patton had recognized the fearful danger to the West posed by the Soviet Union, and he had disagreed bitterly with the orders which he had been given to hold back his army and wait for the Red Army to occupy vast stretches of German, Czech, Rumanian, Hungarian, and Yugoslav territory, which the Americans could have easily taken instead.” Obviously, Russia must not have been presenting a threat to the U.S. and the security of its Allies! So why then would the West create such a communist threat hysteria while allowing the Red Army to enter Berlin in the first place? Or was it rather a repeat of a nefarious plan to carve out Germany? An updated version of the 1919 Versailles treaty?

Hungary’s Jobbik, Greece’s Golden Dawn, Italy’s Lega Nord, and France’s Front National are simply exposing EU’s corruption while the U.S. and NATO transform our continent into a warzone powder keg! Altruistic U.S. hegemon? U.S. concern about a potential European “Putin-threat” is a complete nonsense Washington and our European governments would want us to believe. Just like the U.S. post-WWII fabricated “communist threat” did not exist, the present imaginary “Russian threat” does not either. The real threat to European security does not come from Russia: The real threat to European security comes from the Washington Régime of the United States of America.

In an excellent read: Seventy years of harassing political establishment and people of Europe, Andrey Fomin raises the question:

“Why the hell do U.S. intelligence agencies care about challenges to Europe’s internal security? Aren’t they the same agents who finance, recruit, and control countless political organizations, individuals, and media outlets on the European continent? Why are they so brazenly revealing their dominion over Europe?” Andrey Fomin goes on to say: “A politically correct challenger would argue that the United States saved Europe from the “Communist threat” after the end of WWII, facilitated its speedy economic recovery, and is still safeguarding the continent under its nuclear umbrella. Perhaps. But a review of the historical background should not begin with the Marshall Plan. First of all, that was launched in April 1948. Since the Nazis capitulated in May 1945, a misinformed reader might deduce that the United States had been drafting a massive investment program for Europe for as long as three years, and … he would be wrong. At the Second “Octagon” Quebec Conference in September 1944, President Roosevelt and US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr. submitted to the British PM Winston Churchill their Post-Surrender Program for Germany. That strictly confidential document envisaged the partition and complete deindustrialization of the German state. According to the plan, Germany was to be divided into two independent states. Its epicenters of mining and industry, including the Saar Protectorate, the Ruhr Valley, and Upper Silesia were to be internationalized or annexed by France and Poland…”

Recommendation for a German-Program after Capitulation [“Morgenthau-Plan”] , September the 6^th of 1944 (Document in English starting page three)

Demilitarization of Germany

It should be the aim of the [US] Allied Forces to accomplish the complete demilitarization of Germany in the shortest possible period of time after surrender. This means completely disarming the German Army and people (including the removal or destruction of all war material), the total destruction of the whole German armament industry, and the removal or destruction of other key industries which are basic to military strength.

2. Partitioning of Germany.

• (a) Poland should get that part of East Prussia which doesn’t go to the U.S.S.R. and the southern portion of Silesia as indicated on the attached map,
• (b) France should get the Saar and the adjacent territories bounded by the Rhine and the Moselle Rivers.
• (c) As indicated in part 3 an International Zone should be created containing the Ruhr and the surrounding industrial areas.
• (d) The remaining portion of Germany should be divided into two autonomous, independent states, (1) a South German state comprising Bavaria, Wuerttemberg, Baden and some smaller areas and (2) a North
• German state comprising a large part of the old state of Prussia, Saxony, Thuringia and several smaller states. There shall be a custom union between the new South German state and Austria, which will be restored to her pre-1938 political borders.

3. The Ruhr Area.

• (The Ruhr, surrounding industrial areas, as shown on the attached map, including the Rhineland, the Keil Canal, and all German territory north of the Keil Canal.) Here lies the heart of German industrial power, the cauldron of wars. This area [The Ruhr] should not only be stripped of all presently existing industries but so weakened and controlled that it can not in the foreseeable future become an industrial area. The following steps will accomplish this:
• (a) Within a short period, if possible not longer than 6 months after the cessation of hostilities, all industrial plants and equipment not destroyed by military action shall either be completely dismantled and removed from the area or completely destroyed. All equipment shall be removed from the mines and the mines shall be thoroughly wrecked. It is anticipated that the stripping of this area would be accomplished in three stages:
• (i) The military forces immediately upon entry into the area shall destroy all plants and equipment which cannot be removed.
• (ii) Removal of plants and equipment by members of the United Nations as restitution and reparation (Paragraph 4).
• (iii) All plants and equipment not removed within a stated period of time, say 6 months, will be completely destroyed or reduced to scrap and allocated to the United Nations.
• (b) All people within the area should be made to understand that this area will not again be allowed to become an industrial area. Accordingly, all people and their families within the area having special skills or technical training should be encouraged to migrate permanently from the area and should be as widely dispersed as possible.
• (c) The area should be made an international zone to be governed by an international security organization to be established by the United Nations. In governing the area the international organization should be guided by policies designed to further the above stated objectives.

This was the original postwar proposed Magnus Opus “recovery program” for Germany, known as the Morgenthau Plan. It is well worth reminding the reader that the Germanophobic psychopath, Theodore Newman Kaufman, author of “Germany must perish” is most likely the one who provided the framework to the Morgenthau plan. However, the Morgenthau plan did not take into account Europe’s propensity towards socialism dating back to the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution that initiated the spread of communism/socialism throughout Europe. Most likely, the Morgenthau Plan could have caused a Soviet (USSR) threat to a fragile post-WWII European continent thus it was replaced by the Marshall plan: A plan made to “revive” the economies of Europe away from any Soviet industrial sphere of influence.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Additional sources in alphabetical order:

• —docs.fdrlibrary.marist.edu (link)
• —German History Docs (link)
• —German History Docs (link)
• —Justice 4 Germans: the Kaufman & Morgenthau Plans to Exterminate the Germans prior to during and after WWII (link)
• —http://protest-muenchen.sub-bavaria.de/artikel/90
• —http://www.1000dokumente.de/pdf/dok_0104_mop_de.pdf
• —http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957
• —http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2573923/Estonian-Foreign-Ministry-confirms-authenticity-leaked-phone-call-discussing-Kiev-snipers-shot-protesters-possibly-hired-Ukraines-new-leaders.html
• —http://www.globalresearch.ca/ukraines-gold-reserves-secretely-flown-out-and-confiscated-by-the-new-york-federal-reserve/5373446
• —http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37599.htm
• —http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37599.htm
• —http://www.rense.com/general88/patton.htm
• —http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/ukraine-krise-400-us-soeldner-von-academi-kaempfen-gegen-separatisten-a-968745.html
• —http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/12103602/America-to-investigate-Russian-meddling-in-EU.html
• —http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/feb/07/eu-us-diplomat-victoria-nuland-phonecall-leaked-videohttp://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/feb/07/eu-us-diplomat-victoria-nuland-phonecall-leaked-video
• —http://www.voltairenet.org/article190171.html
• —http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-11/400-blackwater-mercs-deployed-ukraine-against-separatists-german-press-reports
• —https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1951v03p2/d341
• —https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Germany_Must_Perish.pdf

Additional Reading:

• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (part 9)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
• Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)