Tag Archives: Treaty of Versailles

Parallels between Pre-WWI and Pre-World-War Three | How France and Britain Were Threatened by the German Empire | Part One

One of the oldest currencies in the history of mankind is the British Pound going all the way back to Anglo Saxon times in the 8th Century A.D. “. . . From 760 onward till around 1158, pennies were made from the finest silver that the Crown could get, as opposed to today’s pennies made from copper or metal. The sterling pound (in French: £ivre Sterling), in terms of the word was introduced in 1158 because over 90% of it was made from silver itself. The first gold noble coin was introduced into Britain in 1344. The shilling was introduced in 1487, while a new version of the pound was revealed in 1489. As you can see the changes from the 760 to the 1489 shows how quick currency has evolved as the monarchy asserted itself as the leader of how currency should be used. Gold has always been an important part of British currency history as in this period; it was also used to finance whatever was needed in the country by the aristocracy and the gentry . . .credit: peachy.co.uk

By the end of the 19th century, after Germany finally clobbered France in the 1870-1871 Franco-Prussian war, the newly created German Empire started reuniting under Kaiser Wilhelm II’s leadership (1888 to 1918), thus creating an economic threat to globalists empire-hungry Britain and France.  As a reaction to this German-Austrian trade threat aka trade war, Britain, with its Merchandise Marks Act of 1887 gave birth to the “Made in Germany” label. “. . . This label was originally introduced in Britain . . . to mark foreign produce more obviously, as foreign manufactures had been falsely marking inferior goods with the marks of renowned British manufacturing companies and importing them into the United Kingdom. Most of these were found to be originating from Germany, whose government had introduced a protectionist policy to legally prohibit the import of goods in order to build up domestic industry.”

The British Law “Made in Germany” was initially supposed to achieve two things:

  1. Stamp imported German products as third rated and of inferior quality
  2. Promote “British Craftsmanship” to British citizenry 

___Screen Shot 08-17-17 at 04.01 PMbbbToday, very few Germans acknowledge the fact that Germany owes their world renowned “Made in Germany” stamp of quality, which initially was intended as a stamp of third-rateness, to Britain.  By the late 19th century, Britain was becoming an industrial cul-de-sac or a business dwarf compared to the newly created German Empire and its 1882 Triple Alliance with Austria and Italy.

It was the German economy that threatened Britain and France prior to the start of World War One and certainly not the other way around as French and British history books would like us to believe. It was Britain that was becoming a bankrupt “World Empire” as British Gold supplies (British Pound backed up by Gold until 1914) were melting like snow in the sun, to the profit of Germany’s economy, which became a threat to Britain.   

It is worth noticing that Britain had enjoyed a British Pound, first backed up by silver and later on by gold until the gold standards were removed first time in 1914.  By the end of the 19th century, Britain’s economy was going from bad to worse, forced to borrow from its Central Bank to finance a much needed war that was supposed, as Winston Churchill would later on say during World War One, ” [to] smash the strength of the German people once and for all.”

Due to late nineteen century inequality of trade between Britain and the new kid around the block Germany, Britain was losing much of its gold. thus threatening the British Empire to its very core. Why did Britain and France, via the Dictate of Versailles, claimed 132 billion gold marks  (USD 450 billion in today’s dollars) from Germany? Gold Marks: not paper money as issued by the Bank of England established in 1694. Britain’s five centuries of ongoing wars with France, from the Hundred Years War in 1337 to the 1815 Napoleonic wars, had already left major scars on its economy.  

Anti-Germanistic feelings have often been expressed by duplicitous France but also hypocritical Britain. “Even today, American and British media concentrates what scant attention it bestows on anything German almost completely from a negative perspective until the point where the very word “German” is synonymous with ‘bad.’ German historical figures of greatness are rarely mentioned or their contributions are ignored, “misappropriated” or minimized. We are subjected to hundreds of dated British serials and sit-coms on public television which obsess about evil ‘Germans.'” Source: www.revisionist.net

Let’s take a quick look at the British Automobile industry. Is there such a thing? Where are the fine “Made in Britain” Automobiles such as Daimler Benz, BMW (Bayerische Motor Werke), Audi, Volkswagen (VW) and Porsche? Where do we find “Made in England” craftsmanship in this 21st century?

Pre-WWI Britain became so fearful of the German Empire that its elite planned its utter destruction. Outrageous right? Well let Geopolitical News remind you of renowned World War I and II veteran and co-conspirator of the Lusitania’s sinking (Part One and Part Two) by the Germans: Winston Churchill’s quote on the Germans:  

Clipboard_Image 011_F

It is worth remembering that by the 1880’s, the newly create German Empire had caught up with the wealth of Britain, the 19th Century Industrial Revolution leader, to even surpass British steel production and the length of Britain’s railroad tracks. The German navy, thanks to the creation of its Imperial Navy started challenging the British one, thus the manufacturing of one of the world’s fastest sailing vessels at that time: the RMS Lusitania. Later on, the British navy transformed its RMS Lusitania into a warship that would end up being sunk by a German submarine near the coast of Ireland on May the seventh of 1915 (Part One and Part Two.)

Similar to Pre-WWI Britain and France struggling with their economies and threatened by industrial German powerhouse, London, Paris and Washington are again losing their industrial and financial footing; not only towards China (manufacturing most Western goods) and Russia (exporting raw materials) but also towards industrious and thrifty Germany. 

___Screen Shot 08-17-17 at 03.13 PMbbb

The US Dollar, which became the world reserve currency after the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreements is dying of a slow death as reflected by international crude oil prices.

The Petrodollar was introduced by the US to the Saudis in 1974 following an oil crisis induced a year earlier by U.S. Envoy Henry Kissinger with the quadrupling of oil prices from three US Dollar to twelve US Dollar a barrel.

(to be continued…)

Bruno Gebarski for Geopolitical News

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Central Banking, Corruption, Coup d'état, Fascism, France, Geopolitics, Geostrategy, Germany, IMF, Neo Con, Prussia, Russia, Uncategorized, USA, WWI, WWII, WWIII

U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part Two)

___screen-shot-09-12-16-at-12-31-amPolish-American political scientist and geostrategist Zbigniew Brzezinski and his monumental geopolitical work:The Grand Chessboard”, is a must read if we want to better understand 21st century U.S. Hegemon Unipolar World priorities. (Former) Imperialist Atlantic Europe (Portugal, Spain, France, Belgium, The Netherlands and Britain) did rule Europe and the world up to the 1870’s until Continental Europe: Italy (grandiose contributor to modern banking system and the Renaissance) and Germany  “showed up”most likely  feeling left out and wanting a piece of the geopolitical pie. In 1879, Germany and Austria-Hungary formed what is known as the Dual Alliance which became the Triple Alliance with the addition of Italy in 1882. In the late second half of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century (1880 — 1910), the German Empire was to become an economic powerhouse: Its economy rivaled and surpassed imperialistic Britain and France:

“The speed of Germany’s advance to industrial maturity after 1890 was breathtaking. The years from 1895 to 1907 witnessed a doubling of the number of workers engaged in machine building, from slightly more than one-half million to well over a million. An immediate consequence of expanding industrial employment was a sharp drop in emigration; from an average of 130,000 people per year in the 1880s, the outflow dropped to 20,000 per year in the mid-1890s. The surplus population continued to leave Prussia’s eastern provinces, but the destination was the growing and multiplying factories of Berlin and the Ruhr rather than the Americas. Earlier British fears of German competition were now fully justified. While Britain produced about twice as much steel as Germany during the early 1870s, Germany’s steel production exceeded Britain’s in 1893, and by 1914 Germany was producing more than twice as much steel as Britain. Moreover, only one-third of German exports in 1873 were finished goods; the portion rose to 63 percent by 1913. Germany came to dominate all the major Continental markets except France.”(Source: Encyclopedia Britannica)

___bpg_screen-shot-09-11-166-at-06-30-pmDue to its unbalance of trade payments towards Germany, Britain got so worried about losing its gold (The British Pound was then backed up by gold) that in 1887, it issued theMade in GermanyMerchandise Marks Act intended at degrading German products as shoddy compared to the renowned “British manufacturing standards” (sic). Obviously the unintended consequence is the fact that “Made in Germany” became, and remains to this very day, a worldwide seal of first class workmanship and quality. Where is the French, British or U.S. equivalent to Audi, Mercedes Benz, Porsche, Volkswagen, BMW (Bayerische Motor Werke) fine German automobiles? Was this one of the reasons why the Washington neocons have lassoed Volkswagen, for a while the first automobile manufacturer in the world, with a 15 billion USD fine and 3.000 of their cars were blown up in the Tianjin catastrophe?

At the turn of the 20th Century, the German Empire (with Austria, Hungary and Italy) had already become a Post-Industrial Revolution threat to Britain and France unchallenged Imperialists powers. I would like to  suggest that this could have been one of the core reasons why France and Britain needed Germany’s destruction (WWI) “once and for all” as stated by the great Sir Winston Churchill:

“You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest.”

___geopolitics_f_bankster_woodrow-wilson

Shortly after the newly (1913) created Private Federal Reserve, thanks to corrupt U.S. President Woodrow Wilson’s acquiescence, much evidence shows that taking down “German strength” could have very well been on the allies’ agenda:

  1. Germany’s industrial power and the talent of its people
  2. Germany not borrowing money from the central banks of England (BoE) or Federal Reserve

___bpg_screen-shot-09-11-166-at-10-31-pmWhat followed Germany’s 1918 defeat was the 11th of November 1919 humiliating Treaty of Versailles inflicted by Imperialists France and Britain (with the help of the U.S.) The combination of Germany’s WWI defeat and the Versailles dictate had just crushed a superb industrial nation by demanding an additional gold ransom (lost between 1871 and 1914 due to France and Britain’s trade unbalance) of 132 billion (gold) mark

“You see, the real value of a conflict, the true value is in the debt that it creates. You control the debt – you control everything. You find this upsetting, yes? But this is the very essence of the banking industry, to make us all – whether we [are] nations or individuals, slaves to debt.”

—Umberto Calvini, from the motion picture: The International (starring Clive Owen as Louis Sallinger and Naomi Watts as Eleanor Whitman.)

After re-entering the geopolitical chessboard in 1871, Germany’s post WWII-partition, into West-Germany or Western Federal Republic of Germany (FRG), and East Germany or German Democratic Republic (GDR), gave the birth to a bipolar world dominated by the United States of America (USA) and the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR | CCCP: Сою́з Сове́тских Социалисти́ческих Респу́блик). After the fall of the Soviet Union in December 1991, we returned to a Unipolar world dominated by the United States of America but increasingly challenged by the BRICS nations led by the Double Helix Russia and China.

How is the U.S. profiling and securing its geopolitical, financial and industrial hegemony? What are the main geopolitical “building sites” the United States of America is trying to control and secure right now? We shall begin addressing some of these topics:

  • Controlling the Balkan via NATO-Kosovo territories (Camp Bondsteel)
  • Ukraine:  a fascist coup d’état led by the U.S. and EU
  • Syrian conflict and U.S. gas and crude oil control
  • Qatar vs. Iran: The Sunni—Shiite gas dilemma
  • Destabilization of the Eurasian Balkan

Bruno Gebarski

Additional Reading:

  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part One)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy (Part Two)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | September 11th 2001 and the Rise of U.S. Neocons (Part Three)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Preemptive Strike & Neocons Mainstream Media Propaganda (Part Four)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchy and Neocons Destructive Agenda (Part Five)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Oligarchy and Neocons Destructive Agenda (Part Six: coming soon)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | U.S.-NATO Serbian Genocide (Part Seven: planned)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Iraq the War for Oil and Control of the Middle East (Part Eight: planned)
  • U.S. Exceptionalism and U.S. Global Terror Management Strategy | Iraq the War for OIL and Control of the Middle East (Part Nine: planned)

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Al Nusra, Al Qaeda, Central Banking, Color Revolution, Coup d'état, Daesh, Fascism, France, Geopolitics, Geostrategy, Germany, IS, ISIL, ISIS, Islamic State, Migrant, NATO, Neo Con, NWO, Prussia, Refugees, Russia, Syria, Terrorism, Ukraine, USA, WWI, WWII

Versailles (1919): German-humiliating peace treaty from Allies France, Britain & US | Versailles Two: 1945 | Versailles Three: 1992 | Versailles Four: 2015

Interesting to review the cataclysmic and systemic breakdown the Kingdom of Prussia has been forced to face with ongoing warmongers criminals such as French King Louis the XIV, (Thirty-Year-War 1618 — 1848): One of the architects of the bloodiest war the European continent has ever faced with more casualties than WWI and WWII combined; followed years later by Napoleon Bonaparte’s defeat after Prussian General Commander Johan David Ludwig Graf Yorck von Wartenburg (1759 — 1830) finally switched from a French Alliance to a Russian alliance during the War of the Six Coalition that crushed the First French Empire in the famous battle of Waterloo and its victorious side mistakenly credited to Britain.

Germans and Jews have something in common: both folks could be seen as the scapegoats of history: One fitly squeezed in Mittel Europa while the other is entrenched in the Middle East! Both nations are hated and loved, admired and feared, respected but repeatedly destroyed by their allies: France (the most duplicitous of all), Britain and the United States of America. Is not Steve Crawshaw who said: “German suffering and Jewish suffering are not equal . . . They are, however, both real?” Let’s not forget German-British sociologist Ralf Gustav Dahrendorf’s profound words: “German problems are rarely German problems alone.”

I have been living in Germany for almost 30 years and can confirm that anything technical, scientific or musical Germans undertake turns out in a masterpiece of Excellency. The musical heritage of Johann Sebastian Bach, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (I personally consider German since he was born in Augsburg from German parents) and Ludwig van Beethoven is nothing less than the trait of three musical geniuses to whom Superstar Opera composer Richard Wagner should definitely be added. Giuseppe Verdi himself was discouraged about his own work when considering Richard Wagner’s phenomenal musical writing skills.

One might say that France had Hector Berlioz (symphony Fantastique) Maurice Ravel (of all things influenced [Piano Concerto in G] by U.S. composer George Gershwin and his masterwork: Rhapsody in Blue), and Claude Debussy:  Both masters of Impressionism. Britain might have had Benjamin Britten but the musical foundation goes back to Germany with Bach, Mozart and Beethoven. No way around them.

After Prussia finally defeated France, post 1870s did set the stage for the German industrial revolution that almost started 100 years after Britain! At the beginning of the 20th century Germany had more railway track than Britain or France, the German navy was challenging the British one which did not go well with our British and French neighbors feeling challenged and humiliated. So here we go: The stage was set for Germany to be destroyed, not because of its alleged “war mongering,” as western history propaganda would have us to believe, but because of the strength of the German people and most important of all, the fact that between 1870 and 1914

German wealth had NOT been borrowed from the Central Bank of England!

Remember what Churchill said about Germany? After the Lusitania ordeal and the deaths Churchill was also personally responsible for:

Clipboard_Image 011_F

Listening to Western Presstitutes propagandists, Der (The) Spiegel, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Le Monde, El Pais, The Guardian or The Daily Telegraph, one could think that the European fascists political parties are Marine Le Pen’s Front National, Nigel Farage’s UKIP or Geert Wilders‘ Partij voor de Vrijheid – PVV: Party for Freedom or German Pegida and AFD (Alternative für Deutschland) when actually the real danger comes directly from London, Paris, Berlin and particularly the non-elected EU-fascists in Brussels!

Thanks to the migrant crisis, initiated by the US, France and Britain, (see “Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led Terror management” part 3, part 4, part 5, part 6, part 7  and part 8) the social degradation of Germany will further the European fascist super state while causing great harm to our German (European) country(ies), bringing in violence (German New year’s Eve events) and the termination of our national sovereignty and democracies.

The German migrant crisis is completely staged and backed up by the Western propaganda machine, in particular the hired German Presstitutes. In all, expect 1.5 to 2.0 million of this human tsunami to hit Germany again this year. This year alone the arrival of migrants has increased by 132 per cent compared to 2015: They come from the Middle East and North Africa, but also Afghanistan. As in past episodes, France, Britain and the United States are behind this project. Notice that France and Britain are only accepting each twenty thousand for 2015 and another twenty thousand for 2016. What a coincidence!

Remember sociopath Dr. Thomas P. M. Barnett? Dr. Barnett advocates the “manufacturing of a European Negroid or Mongroid race: People too dumb to understand but strong enough to work but those who do not agree should be killed.” The whole project is financed by the Soros NGOs, as shown by Austrian Government Intelligence all this supported by German historian Professor Mag. Dr. Phil. Michael Vogt’s brilliant analysis (quer-denken.tv): “Destabilization with weapons of mass migration.” (Destabilisierung mittels der Migrationswaffe,) which strongly reminds us of Kelly M. Greehill’s work on the topic:  Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy (Cornell Studies in Security Affairs) 1st Edition.

As a centerpiece to this hypothesis. Remember the Treaty of Versailles in 1919. It brought great humiliation to Germany because of France, Britain, and the US with coordinated actions. I hereby suggest that to date, Germany has had three additional Versailles-type events on the historical record.

— 1. Versailles (Original 1919 Version): set the stage for the German Nazi regime and World War II

— 2. Versailles Two (1945) and the final replacement of the Morgenthau plan with the Marshall Plan. The partitioning of Germany by the US and Russia. In its aftermath, U.S. Military General Patton was murdered because he did not agree with waiting for the Soviets to reach Berlin.

— 3. Versailles Three with the inaction of the 1992 Treaty of Maastricht French President François Mitterrand declared: “Maastricht is Versailles without the war.” (Maastricht c’est Versailles sans la guerre. —French President François Mitterrand)

— 4. Versailles Four on September the fourth of 2015 as the corrupt globalist tool German Chancellor Angela Merkel, on EU Commission instructions opened the German boarders unilaterally without any legislative accord. Merkel’s action was a pure fascist deed, like most actions done by the European leaders in Brussels.

Angela Merkel has thus declared the German State obsolete and shattered; she has destroyed the German constitution without any legislative consultation while supporting a  German (and European) genocide as promoted by Dr. Thomas P. M. Barnett in his two macabre books: The Pentagon’s New Map and Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating. Kelly M. Greehill:  Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy (Cornell Studies in Security Affairs) sheds more light on a war practice that has has been used many times before.

Clipboard_Image 005

Much more material needs to be written about France and Britain’s duplicity and treacherous behavior towards Germany (and Israel) throughout their respective history! Germany is not disappearing fast enough; the “melting process” as envisaged by Post World War II fascist monolithic EU-supporters did not suddenly die with the Marshall plan! Many fascists disguising themselves as democrats have pleaded in favor of a European fascist super state as we have it today: Alfred Toepfer, Tony Blair, Edward Heath, Roy Jenkins, Angela Merkel, all have contributed to the fascist European super-state as thoroughly covered in Rodney Atkinson’s excellent presentation: Fascist origins of the EU super state.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Further Reading:

  • Britain & U.S. Pre-WWI “Terror Management” | Winston Churchill | The Reichsbank, The Federal Reserve & The Lusitania Trap (Part 11)
  • Britain & U.S. Pre-WWI “Terror Management” | The British and German Navies | The Lusitania Trap (Part 10)
  • Western NATO and U.S.-led geopolitical duplicity (1949 — 2016) | MittelEuropa, Lebensraum and U.S.-Vassal State Germany (Link)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (part 9)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)
  • Will the abrupt change of U.S. policy towards Syria prove the demise of NATO’s Western Alliance? (link)
  • The Six-Step U.S. Strategy For Violent Regime Takeover (Link)

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Fascism, France, Geopolitics, George Soros, Geostrategy, Germany, Migrant, Morgenthau Plan, Prussia, Refugees, Russia, USA, Winston Churchill, WWI, WWII

Britain & U.S. Pre-WWI “Terror Management” | Winston Churchill | The Reichsbank, The Federal Reserve & The Lusitania Trap (Part Two)

After having won the 1871 war against France, Germany transformed its 300 entities, duchies and city states into a more unified country. In 1876. Germany also started its own central bank, the Reichsbank issuing a Goldmark independently from the Rothschild and Rockefeller central banks criminals of London and Paris. This rapidly allowed Germany to grow enough financial and industrial wealth to become a major European geopolitical and geo-financial power thus threat to both France and Britain.

By 1900, Germany had become the largest steel producer in Europe (1913 steel production: Germany: 19,3 million tons. Britain: 10.4 million tons) with more railway tracks than Britain or France. In 1903, the Naval race between Britain and Germany led the British Navy to build the Lusitania: Coined the “Greyhound of the Seas”, the Lusitania was to become the fastest Atlantic Crossing and to compete with the German Hapag, which dated back to 1847, and Norddeutscher Lloyd (NDL) or North German Lloyd (NGL) formed in 1856.

The Lusitania made her first trip from Liverpool to New York in September 1907. Right before WWI the Lusitania had been transformed for war. Ammunition magazines and concealed gun mounts were fitted on her teak deck standing by for the addition of guns whenever it would be needed.

___1920px-The_Lusitania_at_end_of_record_voyage_1907_LC-USZ62-64956_F

On May 1, 1915, the ship departed New York City bound for Liverpool. Unknown to her passengers but probably no secret to the Germans, almost all her hidden cargo consisted of munitions and contraband destined for the British war effort. As the fastest ship afloat, the luxurious liner felt secure in the belief she could easily outdistance any submarine. Nonetheless, the menace of submarine attack reduced her passenger list to only half her capacity.

___Geopolitics_P_Lusitania_F

On May 7th, 1915, the Lusitania approached within 12 miles of the southern Irish coast. Winston Churchill, the Lord of the Admiralty, knew that German U-boats were operating in the area after three ships had been sunk in the previous 2 days. Not only did Churchill not come to the assistance of the Lusitania but he ordered her planned escort, the destroyer Juno, to return to Queenstown harbor. Earlier, the Lusitania had been ordered to reduce speed by shutting down one of her four boilers (ostensibly to save coal). She was a sitting duck and the entire Admiralty [Winston Churchill] knew it.

___lusitania-u-boat_FAt 2:10 in the afternoon a torpedo fired by the German submarine U 20 slammed into her side. A mysterious second explosion ripped the liner apart. One thousand one hundred nineteen of the 1,924 aboard died. The dead included 114 Americans which enraged the American public opinion. The political fallout was immediate. President Wilson protested strongly to the Germans. Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan, a pacifist, resigned. However, the seeds of American animosity towards Germany were sown.” Within two years after Woodrow Wilson waited for his second term reelection before sending America to war in April 2017.

Central banking: the tri-polar pre-WWI financial tension: The Bank of England, the Reichbank and the Federal Reserve.

Politic_P_Bank_Children.Waking.Up.Homless_1

The propagandist idea behind the Federal Reserve was that the U.S. needed a “powerful banking” entity such as the Bank of England (BoE) as American financiers thought that New York needed to develop its own commercial trading system that could handle bills of exchange in the same way as the London market. The Federal Reserve was founded in 1913 in Jekyll Island and “legalized” by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson’s government not too long after.

Clipboard_Image 002The “Fed” is a private banking institution that has become a U.S and international financial tapeworm parasite as describe by Catherine Austin Fitts. It destroys markets, capital, middle class, societies and families thus, the very foundation of a healthy and thriving society! Since Post WWII Bretton Woods agreements, its parasite tentacles have expended globally and connected itself to the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank with even more looting organizations such as the IMF (International Monetary Fund). the World Bank and the BIS (Bank of International Settlements), all having one single basic currency packaged into four different “names”: USD, GBP, EUR & ‎¥EN. The CHF (Swiss Franc) should be added to the list since the BIS in Basel is very much part of this international banking cartel. It is very relevant to refer again to G. Edward Griffin’s monumental work on the Federal Reserve: “The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve.”

Paul Moritz Warburg (1868 – 1932) was one of the original founders of this “US financial private banking cartel” who drew up the institutional design of the Federal Reserve System. His older brother Max Moritz Warburg (1867 – 1946), a close adviser of Kaiser Wilhelm II. was the German Jewish banker who assisted Germany into financing its WWI expenses. Max Moritz Warburg and his younger brother Paul Moritz were both in favor of an American German financial version of the French-British “Entente Cordiale” in order to erode the British financial and industrial monopoly.

The creation of the German Reichsbank established in 1876. was seen by Britain as a financial threat likely to compete with the Bank of England. From 1873 to 1914 the German Empire introduced the German Goldmark.  At the beginning of WWI the Goldmark was turned into a “Papermark” to become one of the most disastrous financial crisis in German history! The Allies were shrewd enough to demand “Goldmark” payments for WWI compensation and not the fiat “Papermark” legal tender. The German Goldmark became a threat to the London and Washington central bankers: An additional reason why Germany had “to be destroyed.” It would be  worthwhile reading Peter Williamson Campbell‘s work: Britain Was Responsible For WWI, WWII & The Holocaust: Aided And Abetted By The USA And The Vatican to shed more light on the topic of western banking criminality.

The carving out of Germany following WWI by the allies was obvious!  France and Britain wanted to do away with a possible ”German threat” and blend Germany into a European context that should never allow the country, financially and economically, to ever stand up again. Much more was to follow after WWII and the 1992 Treaty of Maastricht coined by French Président François Mitterrand as: “A Versailles Without The War.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Leave a comment

Filed under Central Banking, Geopolitics, Geostrategy, NATO, Prussia, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Rothschild, Rockefeller, USA, Winston Churchill, WWI

Western NATO and U.S.-led geopolitical duplicity (1949 — 2016) | MittelEuropa, Lebensraum | U.S. Vassal State Germany

The Telegraph Europe’s Editor Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse are either geopolitical slapstick comedians or two knuckleheads (dummköpfchen in German) who have lost their political common sense and sold their journalistic raison d’être to a Western never ending anti-Russian media propaganda. Their recent article:”Russia accused of clandestine funding of European parties” and “UK warns of ‘new Cold War’ as Kremlin seeks to divide and rule in Europe.” is an insult to the sound mind and an additional contribution to the debris of geopolitical waste.

Clipboard_Image 019_F

Contrary to what vaudeville comics Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse report, the U.S. has never been interested in the welfare of the German and/or European people whatsoever: Quite the contrary! Germany has become U.S. (NATO) Central European’s dumping ground providing additional territorial space to nature’s oceanic buffer zone! The U.S. has turned our little European continent into a dangerous lethal playground: The result of an increasingly rogue and war mongering Washington régime. And no Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse, Russia did not annex Crimea. Please Gentlemen, do your homework, as we should expect from journalists doing their job accurately instead of the news presstitutes you’ve turned yourselves into.

Even German pro-U.S. propagandist “Der Spiegel” reported: Ukraine-Crisis:  400 U.S.-mercenaries from Academi [Blackwater] are fighting against separatists (Ukraine-Krise: 400 US-Söldner von Academi [Blackwater] kämpfen gegen Separatisten). Consider this hired Blackwater/Academi entity:  Positionened on rooftops, shooting both at police and public demonstrators. These US-based sniper elements were verified by Estonian Embassy translators. They appeared to have been hired by the Maidan Regime, supplied by the U.S. and Langley (CIA).

Clipboard_Image 031

German “Der Spiegel” Western Propaganda

  • Putin, the Dangerous Neighbor | Putin, der gefährliche Nachbarn
  • Stop Putin Now! | Stoppt Putin Jetzt!
  • Putin: the Arsonist/Firestarter | Putin, der Brandstifter
  • Obama Super Star | Obama Super Star
  • Obama, the World President | Obama, der Weltpräsident
  • Obama, the Messiah Factor | Obama, Der Messias Faktor

Wasn’t it bubblegum-chewing Mafia doll Victoria Nuland who said in a leaked private foul-mouthed indiscretion to U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt: “F**k the EU. . . . I think Yats [Arseny Yatsenyuk] is the guy who’s got the economic experience. . . . “I’ve got a five billion USD budget? Wasn’t it the same Victoria Nuland aiming at standing out in her political  career and sounding more macho, miserable and moronic than her male American counterparts? Wasn’t it German chancellor Angela Merkel who described Victoria Nuland’s remarks as “totally unacceptable”? How about the 33 tons of Ukraine central bank’s gold bullion removed, confiscated and stolen then quickly spirited back to New York for “Safe Keeping “and rehypothecation? All this for the sake of the United States “safeguarding” our European interests? Yeah sure!

Since 9/11, regardless of where U.S. agent provocateur has boots on the ground, chaos, destruction and squalor are left behind. In the name of “democracy”, self-created tailor-made terrorist schemes (Al Qaeda/ISIS/IS/ISIL/Daesh) have been applied to countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Mali, Yemen and now Germany (see migrant crisis parts three, four and five) leaving behind a destructive path of destabilization and destruction.

Geopolitics_Germany_Morgenthau.Plan_FSeveral months before the end of the war, General Patton had recognized the fearful danger to the West posed by the Soviet Union, and he had disagreed bitterly with the orders which he had been given to hold back his army and wait for the Red Army to occupy vast stretches of German, Czech, Rumanian, Hungarian, and Yugoslav territory, which the Americans could have easily taken instead.” Obviously, Russia must not have been presenting a threat to the U.S. and the security of its Allies! So why then would the West create such a communist threat hysteria while allowing the Red Army to enter Berlin in the first place? Or was it rather a repeat of a nefarious plan to carve out Germany? An updated version of the 1919 Versailles treaty?

Hungary’s Jobbik, Greece’s Golden Dawn, Italy’s Lega Nord, and France’s Front National are simply exposing EU’s corruption while the U.S. and NATO transform our continent into a warzone powder keg! Altruistic U.S. hegemon? U.S. concern about a potential European “Putin-threat” is a complete nonsense Washington and our European governments would want us to believe. Just like the U.S. post-WWII fabricated “communist threat” did not exist, the present imaginary “Russian threat” does not either. The real threat to European security does not come from Russia: The real threat to European security comes from the Washington Régime of the United States of America.

__Untitled

In an excellent read: Seventy years of harassing political establishment and people of Europe, Andrey Fomin raises the question:

“Why the hell do U.S. intelligence agencies care about challenges to Europe’s internal security? Aren’t they the same agents who finance, recruit, and control countless political organizations, individuals, and media outlets on the European continent? Why are they so brazenly revealing their dominion over Europe?” Andrey Fomin goes on to say: “A politically correct challenger would argue that the United States saved Europe from the “Communist threat” after the end of WWII, facilitated its speedy economic recovery, and is still safeguarding the continent under its nuclear umbrella. Perhaps. But a review of the historical background should not begin with the Marshall Plan. First of all, that was launched in April 1948. Since the Nazis capitulated in May 1945, a misinformed reader might deduce that the United States had been drafting a massive investment program for Europe for as long as three years, and … he would be wrong. At the Second “Octagon” Quebec Conference in September 1944, President Roosevelt and US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr. submitted to the British PM Winston Churchill their Post-Surrender Program for Germany. That strictly confidential document envisaged the partition and complete deindustrialization of the German state. According to the plan, Germany was to be divided into two independent states. Its epicenters of mining and industry, including the Saar Protectorate, the Ruhr Valley, and Upper Silesia were to be internationalized or annexed by France and Poland…”

Recommendation for a German-Program after Capitulation [“Morgenthau-Plan”] , September the 6th of 1944 (Document in English starting page three)

Clipboard_Image 030_FDemilitarization of Germany

It should be the aim of the [US] Allied Forces to accomplish the complete demilitarization of Germany in the shortest possible period of time after surrender. This means completely disarming the German Army and people (including the removal or destruction of all war material), the total destruction of the whole German armament industry, and the removal or destruction of other key industries which are basic to military strength.

  1. Partitioning of Germany.
  • (a) Poland should get that part of East Prussia which doesn’t go to the U.S.S.R. and the southern portion of Silesia as indicated on the attached map,
  • (b) France should get the Saar and the adjacent territories bounded by the Rhine and the Moselle Rivers.
  • (c) As indicated in part 3 an International Zone should be created containing the Ruhr and the surrounding industrial areas.
  • (d) The remaining portion of Germany should be divided into two autonomous, independent states, (1) a South German state comprising Bavaria, Wuerttemberg, Baden and some smaller areas and (2) a North
  • German state comprising a large part of the old state of Prussia, Saxony, Thuringia and several smaller states. There shall be a custom union between the new South German state and Austria, which will be restored to her pre-1938 political borders.
  1. The Ruhr Area.
  • (The Ruhr, surrounding industrial areas, as shown on the attached map, including the Rhineland, the Keil Canal, and all German territory north of the Keil Canal.) Here lies the heart of German industrial power, the cauldron of wars. This area [The Ruhr] should not only be stripped of all presently existing industries but so weakened and controlled that it can not in the foreseeable future become an industrial area. The following steps will accomplish this:
  • (a) Within a short period, if possible not longer than 6 months after the cessation of hostilities, all industrial plants and equipment not destroyed by military action shall either be completely dismantled and removed from the area or completely destroyed. All equipment shall be removed from the mines and the mines shall be thoroughly wrecked. It is anticipated that the stripping of this area would be accomplished in three stages:
  • (i) The military forces immediately upon entry into the area shall destroy all plants and equipment which cannot be removed.
  • (ii) Removal of plants and equipment by members of the United Nations as restitution and reparation (Paragraph 4).
  • (iii) All plants and equipment not removed within a stated period of time, say 6 months, will be completely destroyed or reduced to scrap and allocated to the United Nations.
  • (b) All people within the area should be made to understand that this area will not again be allowed to become an industrial area. Accordingly, all people and their families within the area having special skills or technical training should be encouraged to migrate permanently from the area and should be as widely dispersed as possible.
  • (c) The area should be made an international zone to be governed by an international security organization to be established by the United Nations. In governing the area the international organization should be guided by policies designed to further the above stated objectives.

Clipboard_Image 028This was the original postwar proposed Magnus Opus recovery program for Germany, known as the Morgenthau Plan. It is well worth reminding the reader that the Germanophobic psychopath, Theodore Newman Kaufman, author of “Germany Clipboard_Image 032must perish” is most likely the one who provided the framework to the Morgenthau plan. However, the Morgenthau plan did not take into account Europe’s propensity towards socialism dating back to the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution that initiated the spread of communism/socialism throughout Europe. Most likely, the Morgenthau Plan could have caused a Soviet (USSR) threat to a fragile post-WWII European continent thus it was replaced by the Marshall plan: A plan made to “revive” the economies of Europe away from any Soviet industrial sphere of influence.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Additional sources in alphabetical order:

Additional Reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (part 9)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Academi, Angela Merkel, Blackwater, Bolshevik Revolution, Coup d'état, Fascism, Geopolitics, Geostrategy, Germany, Karl Haushofer, Morgenthau Plan, NATO, Neo Con, Russia, Theodore N. Kaufman, Ukraine, Uncategorized, USA, Victoria Nuland, Winston Churchill, WWI, WWII

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (Part Nine)

”Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” Jorge Agustín Nicolás Ruiz de (George) Santayana, Spanish-born philosopher  (1863 — 1952)

“War is the continuation of politics by other means.” Carl von Clausewitz, Prussian General (1780 — 1831)

Relying on Western Mainstream media is often connected to propaganda and geopolitical lies such as:

  • 9/11 was an Al Qaeda “terror attack” on America (which in some way it was because Al Qaeda is a U.S. CIA asset in the first place!)
  • Russia is alone to be blamed for the Ukrainian conflict
  • Crimea “was invaded” by Vladimir Putin
  • Libya was freed from Muammar al-Gaddafi for “democratic” reasons
  • Egypt and its Arab Spring was the outburst of a “democratic” revolution

Many things are not what they appear to be and many historical events, we were taught at schools/universities or read about, rarely recount the truth of what happened!  Wars are (often) initiated by financial institutions and their bankster cabal!

Could this have been the case when, on June the 28th of 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, were shot dead in Sarajevo (Serbia)? Shortly after their assassination, Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Britain, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Italy, Serbia, Russia, Turkey and the U.S. got involved in a cataclysmic chain of events that would make up for one of the bloodiest wars in European history.

How could a European conflict (and World War One) end up with Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles, often known as the War Guilt Clause, and Germany bearing alone the full moral responsibility for this (European) catastrophe?

“The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.” (Treaty of Versailles, Article 231)

Books_Christopher.Clark_The.SleepwalkersAustralian historian and scholar Christopher Clark, author of “The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914, makes an insightful statement: “Those who think that my book is about an acquittal of Germany’s great responsibility for the conflict are on the wrong path. This book does not set Germany free from its shared responsibility of the outbreak of this war whatsoever. It is an attempt at considering and understanding the origin of this war as a European problem. It is not striving to ‘de-Germanize’ the war but to ‘Europeanize’ it.”

“Wer meint in meinem Buch einen Freispruch für die deutsche Staatsführung damals zu erlesen ist auf dem falschen Weg. . . . Das Buch spricht die deutschen überhaupt nicht von einer starken und großen Mitverantwortung an den Ausbruch dieses Krieges frei, sondern versucht die Entstehung dieses Krieges als europäisches Problem zu verstehen und zu betrachten. Es ist ein Versuch die Geschichte dieses Krieges nicht zu ‘entdeutschen’ sondern zu europäisieren.Christopher Clark

Germany never initiated nor started this war in the first place: Austria-Hungary did! So, why were the Allies (France in particular) so keen at accusing and humiliating Germany when France, Britain, Russia, Serbia, Austria-Hungary and the U.S. should have also been held accountable? Why Germany?

DBP_1988_1378_Made_in_GermanyTo answer this question, we need to review the geopolitical circumstances that transformed Prussia from a fractured kingdom (post Napoleonic wars) to a united German nation. How was Germany able to accumulate so much wealth from 1850 to 1914? Germany’s industrial strength was nothing short of an “Industrial Miracle.” Despite the fact that this Industrial Revolution started 100 years later than in Britain, the Netherlands and Flemish (north) Belgium, by 1900, Germany had become Europe’s number one economy. How did it happen?Clipboard_Image 008_F

The quintessential reason for Germany’s industrial revival (1871-1900) was the establishment of a German Currency (Mark) backed by Gold! Germany’s national wealth Clipboard_Image 014was rapidly created because their gold backed currency was not borrowed from central banks. This is geopolitically and geofinancially crucial because both (private) Bank of England (BoE) and newly created (private) U.S. Federal Reserve (1913 in Jekyll Island) did not have “monetary control” over Germany. As a nation, Germany was free to issue interest free money. Just like Adolf Hitler did with Germany’s development of what would become the world’s finest Autobahn (highway) network, Germany’s “interest free” money speeded up the expansion of its industrial wealth.

Germany’s late nineteen century industrialization was also speeded up thanks to:

  • The 1832 creation of a Zollverein (customs union) that promoted free trade between all German States
  • The 1870 German defeat over France and Otto von Bismarck‘s 1871 creation of a united Germany (from its initial 25 German-speaking states, city-states and duchies) that  stimulated its industrialization even further
  • The new politically united Germany could now exploit the rich iron-fields of Lorraine taken from France
  • The development of a national railway network especially after 1830. By 1850 Germany had constructed half as much as Britain and twice as much as France
  • The extraction of coal from the Silesian, Rhineland and Ruhr fields
  • Germany becoming Europe’s leading steel-producing nation in the late 19th century
  • The emergence of larger companies such as Alfred Krupp (railway, locomotives and armament production) and Werner Siemens

___Geopolitics_Afraid.of.GermanyIncidentally, the 23rd of August 1887 marked the birth of Made in Germany: A trademark law from the “Merchandise Marks Act” imposed by Britain on all German imported goods, which had to bear the Made in Germanylabel. Britain’s obvious intention was to downgrade German products as of “lesser quality” thus “lesser price,” which, as we know, turned out in Germany’s favo(u)r!

We are beginning to see how German currency (gold Mark) and German economy lead us again to the central banksters! London, New York and Paris did not like Germany issuing free money and feared (France especially) the threat that such an economic powerhouse could cause!  Winston Churchill, appointed First Lord of the Admiralty before the start of World War I, would eventually make this revealing tatement:

Clipboard_Image 011_F“You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism but against the economic strength of the German people, which must be smashed once and for all, regardless whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest“. —Winston Churchill

In part 10 of this series, we shall see how French Premier Minister Georges Clémenceau was instrumental into forging the disastrous Treaty of Versailles that would eventually “humiliate” and “flatten” Germany not only economically but also as a nation.

 Bruno P. Gebarski

Further reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (Part 9)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (Part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

Leave a comment

Filed under Central Banking, France, Germany, Prussia, USA, WWI

The Six-Step U.S. Strategy For Violent Regime Takeover

The Establishment or New World Order is leading our democracies towards the worst fascist path ever since World War Two. WWI was followed by the bloody 1939-1944 encore and a “German answer” to the despicable 1919 treaty of Versailles! Were the globalists already planning to “push” Germany into World War Two right off the bat?

330px-Treaty_of_Versailles_Reparations_--_Let's_see_you_collect_F

Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve‘s legalized private banking criminality in 1913 in Jekyll Island thanks to Woodrow Wilson,  one of the three statesmen including  David Lloyd George and Georges Clemenceau who forced the Treaty of Versailles outcome upon Germany, this criminal institution and its fractional banking practices, have managed to turn the U.S. Dollar of the American People into a worthless piece of paper that has lost more than 95% of its initial value. Meanwhile the American folks have had to finance countless wars and coups d’état from South America, Asia (Vietnam and Laos) all the way to Europe (Kosovo) and the Middle East.

Politic_1.F.jpg

“Recently” we have been treated to the following U.S.color revolutions / coups d’état: Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, Ukraine, Syria and who knows if the U.S. will engage in Saudi Arabia in a desperate move to save the remains of a crumbling U.S. Dollar backed up by the 1971 agreement when President Nixon de-pegged the U.S. Dollar from Gold and “reattached it” two years later (1973) via Saudi Arabia to crude oil thus creating the Petrodollar and forcing it unilaterally upon the world community.

Two main U.S. geopolitical routes are to be accounted for when looking at the present situation of our world:

1. Europe axis of U.S. and NATO nefarious geopolitical activism

By “offering” us a fascist U.S. (with EU participation) led coup d’état in Ukraine in 2014, the U.S. geopolitical aim of this maneuver was and is to weaken Europe’s economy and especially Germany while derailing the Gazprom energy supply from Russia towards the European Union.

The news nonsense reporting offered by the Western Media Presstitutes about an alleged Russian power grab is utterly ludicrous and perfectly showcasing western propaganda at its worst! Sevastopol and Crimea have been viewed by the Russian as their own version of Jerusalem! Rarely mentioned by the Western Press is the fact that Crimea voted to 93% to remain Russian!  To add to the agony of Europe’s aching economies, The U.S. regime forced an economic coup d’état upon Europe by sanctioning EU exports (especially the German ones) towards Russia thus jeopardizing even more the receding financial state of the EU economies already affected by the fascist Euro straitjacket.

2. Middle East axis of nefarious U.S. geopolitical activism

The war terrain is multiple, so we shall limit the crisis to Syria for now! The war in Syria is not about chemical weapons whatsoever but the theater of an energy war concerning the South Pars | North Dome Gas-Condensate field shared between Qatar and Iran.

330px-SouthParsLocationMap_F

The U.S. interests are to stop cheap energy delivery coming from the Iran side (South Pars) towards Europe and favor the Qatari (North Dome) route via Saudi Arabia | Jordan | Syria and Turkey.  Since Syria favors the Russo-Chinese Gazprom connection from Iran | Iraq | Syria and Lebanon thus the U.S. CIA (Langley boys) private mercenary (ISIS) military involvement!  This is the real geopolitical dichotomy of the Syrian war in one paragraph and one additional image thanks to a  brilliant Zero Hedge contribution:

QatarTurkeyGasLine_01_F

The Six-Step U.S. Strategy has been thoroughly described by the International Consultant and Author Adrian Salbuchi:

  1. Target a country by calling it first a “rogue state.”
  2. Support “local terrorists” and call them “freedom fighters.”
  3. Destroy local infrastructure (Syria) and kill citizens via “UN sanctions.”
  4. Spread lies and propaganda via the “international community” thanks to the Western Presstitutes.
  5. Liberate “democratically” the rogue nation (Ukraine) via color revolutions and U.S. invasions.
  6. Steal local assets such as theft of Gold in Libya (144 tons) and Ukraine (33 tons) while calling it “foreign investment and reconstruction.”

Clipboard_Image_16_F

The NATO confusion goes on as Germany, France and England support the economic sanctions towards Russia but assist Russia against Langley U.S. made ISIS’ private army of mercenaries financed via narcotic money coming mostly from Afghanistan and the theft of crude oil in the Syrian and Iraqi fields!

A crucial geopolitical year ahead in a world were the drumbeat of World War Three is getting louder and louder…

Bruno P. Gebarski

 

3 Comments

Filed under Central Banking, Geopolitics, Middle East, Syria