Tag Archives: Theodore N. Kaufman

France, Britain, Israel and U.S. deep rooted hatred towards Germany | Earnest Albert Hooton | Theodore N. Kaufman | Louis Nizer

An alliance between Russia and Germany has always made sense: German engineering, excellence of manufacturing to the minutest detail, German craftsmanship respectfully acknowledged by the French as the result of “la rigueur allemande”: German precision and exactness. But let’s look at the Larousse definition of the French word rigueur:

  • Trait of a person, or something that distinguishes himself/itself with exactitude, logic and perfect precision
  • Behaving with severity and inflexibility
  • Excessive as of a rule, obligation or action
  • Character, discipline, staying the course, uncompromising: my personal understanding of the French word rigueur in connection to Germany

I’d like to suggest: German precision with disciplined exactitude as an English translation for the French expression: la rigueur allemande.

The first three definitions came from the French Larousse dictionary (a French institution similar to l’Académie Française (French Academy). I don’t quite agree with excessive; however, severity and inflexibility are a possible negative side of “rigueur” as often perceived by the much more lenient and flexible French, who often are ready to compromise “to get a job done.” The word rigueur has also an intrinsic/built-in meaning of character, discipline, staying the course and not compromising; as opposed to the renowned French “system D” we seem to be so good at!

The French system D is probably the opposite of “la rigueur allemande!” The letter “D” being a charming French euphemism for the verb “se démerder” (French slang) which literally means de-shitting oneself or getting oneself out of a shitty situation one might have been suddenly confronted with! Possessing both cultures and more than 28 years of German residency (while pretending to be fluent in German), I perceive the French expression “la rigueur allemande” as a French (and international) acknowledgement of the high level of German industrial and technological workmanship.

Clipboard_Image 026The French army may not necessarily be an institution the international observer would perceive as having “German precision and disciplined exactitude!” There is a German joke about French tanks: “When do French tanks get to see the front line? With their rear view mirrors.” As a matter of fact the (unofficial) French Resistance (Résistance française) did more damage to the invading Nazis than the official French army. As a German neighbor told me once: “Do you know why France has trees along its roads? . . . “So we Germans can march in the shade.” There is a plethora of French army jokes such as:

  • How many Frenchmen does it take to defend Paris? Nobody knows, it’s never been tried.
  • Why don’t they have fireworks at Euro Disney? Because every time they shoot them off, the French try to surrender.
  • How many gears does a French tank have? Four reverse and one forward, in case the enemy attacks from the rear: my all time favorite.
  • What do you call 100,000 Frenchmen with their hands up? The Army.

“The French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror alert level from ‘Run’ to ‘Hide.’ The only two higher levels in France are ‘Collaborate’ and ‘Surrender.’ The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France’s white flag factory, effectively paralyzing the country’s military capability.” from Alert To Threats in Europe by John Cleese

When I was working as an Export Director for a mid size Bavarian (Franconian) company, not far from Nuremberg, I preferred the comfort of a French Citroën to the traditional Audi/Benz or BMW:  I once heard one of our managers telling someone: “Oh . . . Citroën . . . French cars . . . He [yours truly] should know . . . They already rust in the catalogue!…” Renault, Citroen or Peugeot don’t rust anymore (as they used to in the 70s) but never match(ed) the aura of a “Made in Germany” BMW, Audi or Mercedes Benz!

“Made in Germany” deserves a short visit. In the 1880s, Britain was Europe’s Industrial Revolution flagship. However, Britain was losing ground to Germany being inundated with “cheaper German goods,” similar to how we perceived “made in China” in the 80’s and 90’s. The 23rd of August 1887 marked the birth of “Made in Germany.” A British trademark law from the merchandise Marks Act imposed by Britain for all imported German products, which had to carry the label Made in Germany.” Britain meant this trademark as a mean to downgrade German goods but it eventually turned out to be the exact opposite! German industrialists owe the origin of Made in Germany to Britain.

In all seriousness, there has been and still is an ongoing conspiracy against the German people, particularly prior to WWI and onward. Folks like Earnest Albert Hooton, Theodore N. Kaufman and Louis Nizer are three renowned Anglo Saxon “stars” who outwardly promoted and encouraged a German ethnic cleansing aka genocide.

Professor Earnest Albert Hooton (1887 — 1954) was a U.S. anthropologist and Professor at Harvard University.

In his article “Breed War Strain Out of Germans” in the New York daily newspaper P.M. from January 4, 1943, “Sir” Earnest Albert Hooton (also notorious for his anti-Semitic written rants) laid out an “out-breeding” plan that would destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities. Where did Hooton acquire such pathological and evil anti-German hatred: In the U.S.A. or while studying in Britain at Oxford University?

Clipboard_Image 023

New York daily newspaper P.M. from January 4, 1943

“Our distinguished” Harvard University professor’s proposal was calling for “genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, who would be brought into the country in large numbers [doesn’t this remind us of Germany’s 2015 migrant invasion?] and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies . . . The objects of this measure,” wrote Dr. Hooton, “include reduction of the birthrate of ‘pure’ Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by ‘out breeding’ and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals.”

Theodore N. Kaufman (1911 — 1986) and his publication: “Germany Must Perish”

Clipboard_Image 021“Theodore N. Kaufman, the author of Germany Must Perish, was a Manhattan-born Jewish [Zionist] businessman who was also chairman of a group that called itself the ‘American Federation for Peace (sic).’ [The following lines will prove the veracity of Kaufman’s understanding of the word peace.] The first edition of Germany Must Perish was published in 1940 or early 1941. A second, 96-page edition, which sold for 25 cents, was published in 1941 by Argyle Press of Newark, New Jersey. Both editions were issued when the United States was still officially neutral, that is, before the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941. Theodore N. Kaufman’s fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman’s plan a ‘sensational idea.’”

Theodore N. Kaufmann: Chairman of the “American Federation for Peace”: “The most practical and expeditious manner in which the ultimate penalty must be levied upon the German nation. Quite naturally, massacre and wholesale execution must be ruled out [how gracious and civilized of you Sir Kaufmann!]. In addition to being impractical when applied to a population of some seventy million, such methods are inconsistent with the moral obligations and ethical practices of civilization. There remains then but one mode of ridding the world forces of Germanism — and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind. This modern method, known to science as Eugenic Sterilization, is at once practical, humane and thorough. Sterilization has become a byword of science, as the best means of ridding the human race of its misfits: the degenerate, the insane, the hereditary criminal.”

Louis Nizer (1902 — 1994): American trial lawyer and senior partner of the law firm Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon.

Clipboard_Image 022‘In 1945 some particularly clever American Jews published the occupation guidebook What to do with Germany 1945, distributed by special service forces, army services forces, U.S. army.  The directive was based on a book of the same title by Louis Nizer  [What To Do With Germany], which was published in 1944 and is posted on the Internet. Louis Nizer, a wealthy Jewish lawyer from New York with close ties to the White House, was a colleague of Theodore Kaufmann, (author of Germany Must Perish), and of Henry Morgenthau, FDR’s [Franklin Delano Roosevelt] Secretary of the Treasury and the author of the Morgenthau Plan [more about the Morgenthau Plan in a following blog article] . . . Louis Nizer argued that ‘instead of de-industrializing Germany and reducing its population through starvation and sterilization, the USA should benevolently ‘lobotomize the Germans culturally, educationally and psychologically.'”

Sir Louis Nizer went on to say: “The French were accustomed to saying, ‘we must destroy Germany or make peace with her and to destroy her is an absurdity.’ But as the French have since learned, it is not easy to make peace with her. Others, stirred to consuming hatred by German brutalities, suggest that they be destroyed as a race by eugenic sterilization. They argue that . . . sterilization of the German people might similarly be considered a protective measure to immunize the world forever against the virus of Germanism . . . Vasectomy, the operation on the male, simply requires a slight incision since the sperm duct lies just beneath the skin. The operation takes only ten minutes to perform and the patient may resume work immediately afterwards . . . There are about 25 million German men and women within the procreation ages, and it is estimated that twenty thousand surgeons performing about twenty-five operations daily could sterilize the entire male population of Germany within three months. At the normal death rate of two per cent per annum or one and a half million people yearly, the German people would practically disappear within two generations.”

In the following installment, we shall review the war crimes of (Western) leaders such as Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Additional  reading:

  • Versailles (1919): German-humiliating peace treaty from Allies France, Britain & US | Versailles Two: 1945 | Versailles Three: 1993 | Versailles Four: 2015 (Part 12)
  • Britain & U.S. Pre-WWI “Terror Management” | Winston Churchill | The Reichsbank, The Federal Reserve & The Lusitania Trap (Part 11)
  • Britain & U.S. Pre-WWI “Terror Management” | The British and German Navies | The Lusitania Trap (Part 10)
  • Western NATO and U.S.-led geopolitical duplicity (1949 — 2016) | MittelEuropa, Lebensraum and U.S.-Vassal State Germany (Link)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (part 9)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)
  • Will the abrupt change of U.S. policy towards Syria prove the demise of NATO’s Western Alliance? (link)
  • The Six-Step U.S. Strategy For Violent Regime Takeover (Link)

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, Earnest Albert Hooton, Eugenics, Fascism, France, French Resistance, Germany, Louis Nizer, Migrant, NATO, NWO, Paris, Prussia, Theodore N. Kaufman, USA, Winston Churchill, WWI, WWII

Western NATO and U.S.-led geopolitical duplicity (1949 — 2016) | MittelEuropa, Lebensraum | U.S. Vassal State Germany

The Telegraph Europe’s Editor Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse are either geopolitical slapstick comedians or two knuckleheads (dummköpfchen in German) who have lost their political common sense and sold their journalistic raison d’être to a Western never ending anti-Russian media propaganda. Their recent article:”Russia accused of clandestine funding of European parties” and “UK warns of ‘new Cold War’ as Kremlin seeks to divide and rule in Europe.” is an insult to the sound mind and an additional contribution to the debris of geopolitical waste.

Clipboard_Image 019_F

Contrary to what vaudeville comics Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse report, the U.S. has never been interested in the welfare of the German and/or European people whatsoever: Quite the contrary! Germany has become U.S. (NATO) Central European’s dumping ground providing additional territorial space to nature’s oceanic buffer zone! The U.S. has turned our little European continent into a dangerous lethal playground: The result of an increasingly rogue and war mongering Washington régime. And no Peter Foster and Matthew Holehouse, Russia did not annex Crimea. Please Gentlemen, do your homework, as we should expect from journalists doing their job accurately instead of the news presstitutes you’ve turned yourselves into.

Even German pro-U.S. propagandist “Der Spiegel” reported: Ukraine-Crisis:  400 U.S.-mercenaries from Academi [Blackwater] are fighting against separatists (Ukraine-Krise: 400 US-Söldner von Academi [Blackwater] kämpfen gegen Separatisten). Consider this hired Blackwater/Academi entity:  Positionened on rooftops, shooting both at police and public demonstrators. These US-based sniper elements were verified by Estonian Embassy translators. They appeared to have been hired by the Maidan Regime, supplied by the U.S. and Langley (CIA).

Clipboard_Image 031

German “Der Spiegel” Western Propaganda

  • Putin, the Dangerous Neighbor | Putin, der gefährliche Nachbarn
  • Stop Putin Now! | Stoppt Putin Jetzt!
  • Putin: the Arsonist/Firestarter | Putin, der Brandstifter
  • Obama Super Star | Obama Super Star
  • Obama, the World President | Obama, der Weltpräsident
  • Obama, the Messiah Factor | Obama, Der Messias Faktor

Wasn’t it bubblegum-chewing Mafia doll Victoria Nuland who said in a leaked private foul-mouthed indiscretion to U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt: “F**k the EU. . . . I think Yats [Arseny Yatsenyuk] is the guy who’s got the economic experience. . . . “I’ve got a five billion USD budget? Wasn’t it the same Victoria Nuland aiming at standing out in her political  career and sounding more macho, miserable and moronic than her male American counterparts? Wasn’t it German chancellor Angela Merkel who described Victoria Nuland’s remarks as “totally unacceptable”? How about the 33 tons of Ukraine central bank’s gold bullion removed, confiscated and stolen then quickly spirited back to New York for “Safe Keeping “and rehypothecation? All this for the sake of the United States “safeguarding” our European interests? Yeah sure!

Since 9/11, regardless of where U.S. agent provocateur has boots on the ground, chaos, destruction and squalor are left behind. In the name of “democracy”, self-created tailor-made terrorist schemes (Al Qaeda/ISIS/IS/ISIL/Daesh) have been applied to countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Mali, Yemen and now Germany (see migrant crisis parts three, four and five) leaving behind a destructive path of destabilization and destruction.

Geopolitics_Germany_Morgenthau.Plan_FSeveral months before the end of the war, General Patton had recognized the fearful danger to the West posed by the Soviet Union, and he had disagreed bitterly with the orders which he had been given to hold back his army and wait for the Red Army to occupy vast stretches of German, Czech, Rumanian, Hungarian, and Yugoslav territory, which the Americans could have easily taken instead.” Obviously, Russia must not have been presenting a threat to the U.S. and the security of its Allies! So why then would the West create such a communist threat hysteria while allowing the Red Army to enter Berlin in the first place? Or was it rather a repeat of a nefarious plan to carve out Germany? An updated version of the 1919 Versailles treaty?

Hungary’s Jobbik, Greece’s Golden Dawn, Italy’s Lega Nord, and France’s Front National are simply exposing EU’s corruption while the U.S. and NATO transform our continent into a warzone powder keg! Altruistic U.S. hegemon? U.S. concern about a potential European “Putin-threat” is a complete nonsense Washington and our European governments would want us to believe. Just like the U.S. post-WWII fabricated “communist threat” did not exist, the present imaginary “Russian threat” does not either. The real threat to European security does not come from Russia: The real threat to European security comes from the Washington Régime of the United States of America.

__Untitled

In an excellent read: Seventy years of harassing political establishment and people of Europe, Andrey Fomin raises the question:

“Why the hell do U.S. intelligence agencies care about challenges to Europe’s internal security? Aren’t they the same agents who finance, recruit, and control countless political organizations, individuals, and media outlets on the European continent? Why are they so brazenly revealing their dominion over Europe?” Andrey Fomin goes on to say: “A politically correct challenger would argue that the United States saved Europe from the “Communist threat” after the end of WWII, facilitated its speedy economic recovery, and is still safeguarding the continent under its nuclear umbrella. Perhaps. But a review of the historical background should not begin with the Marshall Plan. First of all, that was launched in April 1948. Since the Nazis capitulated in May 1945, a misinformed reader might deduce that the United States had been drafting a massive investment program for Europe for as long as three years, and … he would be wrong. At the Second “Octagon” Quebec Conference in September 1944, President Roosevelt and US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr. submitted to the British PM Winston Churchill their Post-Surrender Program for Germany. That strictly confidential document envisaged the partition and complete deindustrialization of the German state. According to the plan, Germany was to be divided into two independent states. Its epicenters of mining and industry, including the Saar Protectorate, the Ruhr Valley, and Upper Silesia were to be internationalized or annexed by France and Poland…”

Recommendation for a German-Program after Capitulation [“Morgenthau-Plan”] , September the 6th of 1944 (Document in English starting page three)

Clipboard_Image 030_FDemilitarization of Germany

It should be the aim of the [US] Allied Forces to accomplish the complete demilitarization of Germany in the shortest possible period of time after surrender. This means completely disarming the German Army and people (including the removal or destruction of all war material), the total destruction of the whole German armament industry, and the removal or destruction of other key industries which are basic to military strength.

  1. Partitioning of Germany.
  • (a) Poland should get that part of East Prussia which doesn’t go to the U.S.S.R. and the southern portion of Silesia as indicated on the attached map,
  • (b) France should get the Saar and the adjacent territories bounded by the Rhine and the Moselle Rivers.
  • (c) As indicated in part 3 an International Zone should be created containing the Ruhr and the surrounding industrial areas.
  • (d) The remaining portion of Germany should be divided into two autonomous, independent states, (1) a South German state comprising Bavaria, Wuerttemberg, Baden and some smaller areas and (2) a North
  • German state comprising a large part of the old state of Prussia, Saxony, Thuringia and several smaller states. There shall be a custom union between the new South German state and Austria, which will be restored to her pre-1938 political borders.
  1. The Ruhr Area.
  • (The Ruhr, surrounding industrial areas, as shown on the attached map, including the Rhineland, the Keil Canal, and all German territory north of the Keil Canal.) Here lies the heart of German industrial power, the cauldron of wars. This area [The Ruhr] should not only be stripped of all presently existing industries but so weakened and controlled that it can not in the foreseeable future become an industrial area. The following steps will accomplish this:
  • (a) Within a short period, if possible not longer than 6 months after the cessation of hostilities, all industrial plants and equipment not destroyed by military action shall either be completely dismantled and removed from the area or completely destroyed. All equipment shall be removed from the mines and the mines shall be thoroughly wrecked. It is anticipated that the stripping of this area would be accomplished in three stages:
  • (i) The military forces immediately upon entry into the area shall destroy all plants and equipment which cannot be removed.
  • (ii) Removal of plants and equipment by members of the United Nations as restitution and reparation (Paragraph 4).
  • (iii) All plants and equipment not removed within a stated period of time, say 6 months, will be completely destroyed or reduced to scrap and allocated to the United Nations.
  • (b) All people within the area should be made to understand that this area will not again be allowed to become an industrial area. Accordingly, all people and their families within the area having special skills or technical training should be encouraged to migrate permanently from the area and should be as widely dispersed as possible.
  • (c) The area should be made an international zone to be governed by an international security organization to be established by the United Nations. In governing the area the international organization should be guided by policies designed to further the above stated objectives.

Clipboard_Image 028This was the original postwar proposed Magnus Opus recovery program for Germany, known as the Morgenthau Plan. It is well worth reminding the reader that the Germanophobic psychopath, Theodore Newman Kaufman, author of “Germany Clipboard_Image 032must perish” is most likely the one who provided the framework to the Morgenthau plan. However, the Morgenthau plan did not take into account Europe’s propensity towards socialism dating back to the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution that initiated the spread of communism/socialism throughout Europe. Most likely, the Morgenthau Plan could have caused a Soviet (USSR) threat to a fragile post-WWII European continent thus it was replaced by the Marshall plan: A plan made to “revive” the economies of Europe away from any Soviet industrial sphere of influence.

Bruno P. Gebarski

Additional sources in alphabetical order:

Additional Reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany 1871 – 1914 | German Gold Mark | German Industrial Revolution (part 9)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Organized Migrant invasion | Asylum Industry | NGOs‘ Online Traveling Advice & Migrant Handbooks (Part 8)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management” | Germany’s Migrant Sexual Crimes: unintended consequences or organized consequence? (part 7)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Academi, Angela Merkel, Blackwater, Bolshevik Revolution, Coup d'état, Fascism, Geopolitics, Geostrategy, Germany, Karl Haushofer, Morgenthau Plan, NATO, Neo Con, Russia, Theodore N. Kaufman, Ukraine, Uncategorized, USA, Victoria Nuland, Winston Churchill, WWI, WWII