Tag Archives: Presstitutes

Guest Article: “Trump’s Anti-Interventionism – Neocons Hate It As Anti-War Left Comes Around”

Original Link: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-22/trumps-anti-interventionism-neocons-hate-it-anti-war-left-comes-around

Submitted by John Walsh via LewRockwell.com,

Until recently the progressive mind has been resolutely closed and stubbornly frozen in place against all things Trump.

But cracks are appearing in the ice.  With increasing frequency over the last few months, some of the most thoughtful left and progressive figures have begun to speak favorably of aspects of Trump’s foreign policy.  Let us hear from these heretics, among them William Greider, Glen Ford, John Pilger, Jean Bricmont, Stephen F. Cohen and William Blum.  Their words are not to be construed as “endorsements,” but rather an acknowledgment of Trump’s anti-interventionist views, the impact those views are having and the alternative he poses to Hillary Clinton in the current electoral contest.

First, let’s consider the estimable William Greider, a regular contributor to The Nation and author of Secrets of the Temple.  He titled a recent article for the Nation, “Donald Trump Could be The Military Industrial Complex’s Worst Nightmare: The Republican Front Runner is Against Nation Building.  Imagine That.” 

Greider’s article is brief, and I recommend reading every precious word of it.  Here is but one quote: “Trump has, in his usual unvarnished manner, kicked open the door to an important and fundamental foreign-policy debate.”  And here is a passage from Trump’s interview with the Washington Post that Greider chooses to quote:

“‘I watched as we built schools in Iraq and they’d be blown up,’ Trump told the editors.  ‘And we’d build another one and it would get blown up. And we would rebuild it three times. And yet we can’t build a school in Brooklyn.… at what point do you say hey, we have to take care of ourselves. So, you know, I know the outer world exists and I’ll be very cognizant of that but at the same time, our country is disintegrating, large sections of it, especially in the inner cities.'”

Trump talks about building infrastructure for the inner cities, especially better schools for African American children, rather than bombing people of color halfway around the world!  That is hardly racism.  And it is not how the mainstream media wants us to think of The Donald.

Next, Glen Ford, the eloquent radical Left executive editor of Black Agenda Report, a superb and widely read outlet, penned an article in March 2016, with the following title: “Trump Way to the Left of Clinton on Foreign Policy – In Fact, He’s Damn Near Anti-Empire.” Ford’s piece is well worth reading in its entirety; here are just a few quotes :

“Trump has rejected the whole gamut of U.S. imperial war rationales, from FDR straight through to the present.”

 

“If Trump’s tens of millions of white, so-called ‘Middle American’ followers stick by him, it will utterly shatter the prevailing assumption that the American public favors maintenance of U.S. empire by military means.”

 

“Trump shows no interest in ‘spreading democracy,’ like George W. Bush, or assuming a responsibility to ‘protect’ other peoples from their own governments, like Barack Obama and his political twin, Hillary Clinton.”

 

“It is sad beyond measure that the near-extinction of independent Black politics has placed African Americans in the most untenable position imaginable at this critical moment: in the Hillary Clinton camp.

Next, let’s turn to John Pilger, the Left wing Australian journalist and documentary film maker who has been writing about Western foreign policy with unimpeachable accuracy and wisdom since the Vietnam War era.   Here are some of his comments on Trump:

“..Donald Trump is being presented (by the mass media) as a lunatic, a fascist.  He is certainly odious; but he is also a media hate figure.  That alone should arouse our skepticism.”

 

“Trump’s views on migration are grotesque, but no more grotesque than those of David Cameron. It is not Trump who is the Great Deporter from the United States, but the Nobel Peace Prize winner, Barack Obama.”

 

“In 1947, a series of National Security Council directives described the paramount aim of American foreign policy as ‘a world substantially made over in [America’s] own image’.  The ideology was messianic Americanism. We were all Americans. Or else. …”

 

“Donald Trump is a symptom of this, but he is also a maverick. He says the invasion of Iraq was a crime; he doesn’t want to go to war with Russia and China. The danger to the rest of us is not Trump, but Hillary Clinton. She is no maverick. She embodies the resilience and violence of a system whose vaunted ‘exceptionalism’ is totalitarian with an occasional liberal face.

The money quote is: “The danger to the rest of us is not Trump, but Hillary Clinton.”  When Pilger submitted his article to the “progressive” magazine Truthout, this sentence was deleted, censored as he reported, along with a few of the surrounding sentences.  Such censorship had not been imposed on Pilger by Truthout ever before.  Truthout’s commitment to free speech apparently has limits in the case of The Donald versus Hillary, rather severe ones.  So one must read even the progressive press with some skepticism when it comes to Trump.

Trump has also been noticed by the Left in Europe, notably by the sharp minded Jean Bricmont, physicist and author of Humanitarian Imperialism who writes here:

 

(Trump) “is the first major political figure to call for ‘America First’ meaning non-interventionism.  He not only denounces the trillions of dollars spent in wars, deplores the dead and wounded American soldiers, but also speaks of the Iraqi victims of a war launched by a Republican President. He does so to a Republican public and manages to win its support. He denounces the empire of US military bases, claiming to prefer to build schools here in the United States. He wants good relations with Russia. He observes that the militarist policies pursued for decades have caused the United States to be hated throughout the world. He calls Sarkozy a criminal who should be judged for his role in Libya. Another advantage of Trump: he is detested by the neoconservatives, who are the main architects of the present disaster.”

And then there is Stephen F. Cohen, contributing editor for The Nation and Professor Emeritus of Russian History at Princeton and NYU.  Cohen makes the point that Trump, alone among the presidential candidates, has raised five urgent and fundamental questions, which all other candidates in the major parties have either scorned or more frequently ignored. The five questions all call into question the interventionist warlike stance of the US for the past 20 plus years. Cohen enumerates the questions here, thus:

“Should the United States always be the world’s leader and policeman?

 

“What is NATO’s proper mission today, 25 years after the end of the Soviet Union and when international terrorism is the main threat to the West?

 

“Why does Washington repeatedly pursue a policy of regime change, in Iraq, Libya, possibly in Ukraine, and now in Damascus, even though it always ends in “disaster”?

 

“Why is the United States treating Putin’s Russia as an enemy and not as a security partner?

 

“And should US nuclear weapons doctrine include a no-first use pledge, which it does not?”

Cohen comments in detail on these questions here. Whatever one may think of the answers Trump has provided to the five questions, there is no doubt that he alone among the presidential candidates has raised them – and that in itself is an important contribution.

At this point, I mention my own piece, which appeared late last year.  Entitled “Who is the Arch Racist, Hillary or The Donald”?  Like Cohen’s pieces, it finds merit with the Trump foreign policy in the context of posing a question.

Finally, let us turn to Bill Blum, who wrote an article entitled, “American Exceptionalism and the Election Made in Hell (Or Why I’d Vote for Trump Over Hillary).”  Again there is little doubt about the stance of Blum, who is the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II, a scholarly compendium, which Noam Chomsky calls “Far and away the best book on the topic.”

Blum begins his piece:

“If the American presidential election winds up with Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump, and my passport is confiscated, and I’m somehow FORCED to choose one or the other, or I’m PAID to do so, paid well … I would vote for Trump.”

 

“My main concern is foreign policy. American foreign policy is the greatest threat to world peace, prosperity, and the environment. And when it comes to foreign policy, Hillary Clinton is an unholy disaster. From Iraq and Syria to Libya and Honduras the world is a much worse place because of her; so much so that I’d call her a war criminal who should be prosecuted.”

And he concludes:

“He (Trump) calls Iraq ‘a complete disaster’, condemning not only George W. Bush but the neocons who surrounded him. ‘They lied. They said there were weapons of mass destruction and there were none. And they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction.’ He even questions the idea that ‘Bush kept us safe’, and adds that ‘Whether you like Saddam or not, he used to kill terrorists’.”

“Yes, he’s personally obnoxious. I’d have a very hard time being his friend. Who cares?”

I conclude with Blum’s words because they are most pertinent to our present situation.  The world is living through a perilous time when the likes of the neocons and Hillary Clinton could lead us into a nuclear Armageddon with their belligerence toward Russia and their militaristic confrontation with China.

The reality is that we are faced with a choice between Clinton and Trump, a choice which informs much of the above commentary.  Survival is at stake and we must consider survival first if our judgments are to be sane.

Original Link: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-22/trumps-anti-interventionism-neocons-hate-it-anti-war-left-comes-around

Submitted by John Walsh via LewRockwell.com

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Al Nusra, Al Qaeda, Bolshevik Revolution, Color Revolution, Daesh, IS, ISIL, ISIS, Islamic State, Libya, Middle East, Migrant, NATO, Neo Con, NGO, NWO, Russia, Syria, Terrorism, Ukraine, USA, Vladimir Putin, WWIII

United States of America: the 21st century manufacturing “Hegemon” viewed from Germany!

A few weeks ago a German friend and I were summarizing USA’s twenty first century contribution to the international community:

  1. USA: World Champion in the manufacturing of sodomy, pornography of the worst type coming out of the world renowned “San Fer(Por)nando Valley in Los Angeles Californi
  2. USA: World Champion in the rate of abortion and the +60 million lives that have been snuffed out since its inception
  3. USA: World Champion in the manufacturing of fiat currency money printed out of nothing and at the speed of several hundred billion USD every month by the Federal Reserve’s private banking criminals as opposed to Russia and China: More than 80% of Wal-Mart’s product range is made in China!
  4. USA: World Champion in the manufacturing of terrorism and its export via Al-Qaeda, ISIS, ISIL, IS or Daesh (Made in the United States of America) nefarious terror-subsidiaries sponsoring violence and turning countries such as Egypt, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine, Yemen and soon Germany into failed states.
  5. USA: World Champion in manufacturing genetically modified organisms while destroying our international agricultural heritage and forcing its nefarious seeds of death all around the planet (Monsanto.)
  6. USA: World Champion in manufacturing fiat products with hedge funds derivative portfolio valued at a minimum of 600 trillion USD.
  7. USA: World Champion in destroying families, Christian values, Father, Mother, God, the 10 commandments and morals while supporting sodomy and endangering the safety of our children and grandchildren for generations to come.
  8. USA: World Champion in destroying western economies while importing by theft while paying its bills with fiat money printed out of thin air.
  9. USA: World Champion in drug manufacturing with more than 70% of US-cocaine sourced from Afghanistan where the US-CIA criminals control its export via NATO airbases in Ramstein Germany and Incirlik Turkey
  10. USA: World Champion in Arms Export Industry  (2014: figures in million USD)

How long will the international community accept to deliver goods and services to a country that not only promotes sodomy, destroys the environment, our heritage and our families but also settles its bills with US-Treasuries printed out of thin air? This will have to come to an end soon and it will!

Bruno P. Gebarski

Leave a comment

Filed under Central Banking, Corruption, Fascism, Geopolitics, George Soros, Germany, NATO, NWO, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Russia, Syria, Ukraine, USA, USD, WWIII

Ukraine 22nd and 23rd of February 2014 U.S. Coup d’État | Viktor A. Yushchenko | Viktor F. Yanukovych | EU & U.S. NeoCons: Petro O. Poroshenko

To this day the bulk of German citizenry, spoon fed by German western propagandists such as Der Spiegel, Focus, Bild, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Die Welt and Süd Deutsche Zeitung, to name just a few, believes that Russian President Vladimir Putin is responsible for the Ukraine conflict. U.S. CIA fueled German drumbeat propaganda is loud and clear: As former (German) mainstream media journalist and whistle blower Udo Ulfkotte once said: “You either publish what is ‘expected of you’ or you’re pronto out of a job!” Welcome to (German) 21st century western neocon journalism and this, mind you, on both sides of the pond!

Clipboard_Image 110

A few golden nuggets preceding this Western Ukrainian Eurasian coup d’état ought to be reviewed. Here are some of the events that led to the climax of this well orchestrated western geopolitical fascist masquerade!

__clipboard_image_16In his article:  CIA: Undermining and Nazifying Ukraine Since 1953,” Wayne Madsen writes: “The recent declassification of over 3800 documents by the Central Intelligence Agency provides detailed proof that since 1953 the CIA operated two major programs intent on not only destabilizing Ukraine but Nazifying it with followers of the World War II Ukrainian Nazi leader Stepan Bandera.  The CIA programs spanned some four decades. Starting as a paramilitary operation that provided funding and equipment for such anti-Soviet Ukrainian resistance groups as the Ukrainian Supreme Liberation Council (UHVR); its affiliates, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), all Nazi Banderists. The CIA also provided support to a relatively anti-Bandera faction of the UHVR, the ZP-UHVR, a foreign-based virtual branch of the CIA and British MI-6 intelligence services. The early CIA operation to destabilize Ukraine, using exile Ukrainian agents in the West who were infiltrated into Soviet Ukraine, was codenamed Project Aerodynamic.

Ukraine’s dramatic November and December 2004 Orange Revolution

Geopolitics_Ukraine_F_Yulia.Tymoshenko

Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko

Six months after the November December 2004 Orange Revolution, led by Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych, the Ukraine, and its Western-leaning president Viktor Andriyovych Yushchenko and charismatic Prime Minister Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko, who later ended up in jail for corruption, was on a firm Western-oriented course! Reforms however remained slow. While Viktor A. Yushchenko was celebrated as a hero, his leadership started drawing disapproval. The Kyiv Post was then urging its readers to “resist Orange depression.”

 

Geopolitics_Ukraine_F_Yushchenko_Yanukovyth_Poroshenko“In December 2004 US Congressman Ron Paul of Texas, a libertarian Republican and critic of the Iraq War, echoed President George W Bush’s words that ‘Any election (in Ukraine), if there is one, ought to be free from any foreign influence.’ He continued, ‘I agree with the president wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, it seems that several U.S. government agencies saw things differently and sent U.S. taxpayer dollars into Ukraine in an attempt to influence the outcome’” (Ron Paul 2004).

In late august 2006, President Viktor Andriyovych Yushchenko was forced to appoint Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych as prime minister after his own allies, including Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko failed to form a government. Interesting to notice that both Viktor A. Yushchenko and Yulia V. Tymoshenko accused each other of corruption!  Finally on the 7th of February 2010, Viktor F. Yanukovych, leader of the Region’s Party, won the Ukrainian presidential election with 48,95%, against 45,47% of the votes for Yulia V. Tymoshenko.

On the 22nd and 23rd of February 2014 and under the leadership and the baton of U.S. American neo con “diplomats:” Victoria Nuland and Jeffrey Pyatt, the Ukrainian Verkhovna Rada staged a coup d’état on its Ukrainian people: The Ukrainian parliament forced its president Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych to resign and replaced him with the former boss of its secret services Oleksandr Turchynov. The Ukrainian constitution that used to be parliamentary was repealed and transformed into a presidential type of régime similar to the United States of America: What a coincidence!

 

Clipboard_Image 109

Yulia Volodymyrivna Tymoshenko

Democratically elected President Viktor F. Yanukovych was impeached and removed from office. Former Prime Minister and billionaire Yulia V. Tymoshenko (undergoing a seven-year prison sentence) was released and Oleksandr Valentynovych Turchynov was proclaimed acting (sic) president. The whole neo colonialism western bloody power grab (coup d’état) was then celebrated by Western Powers and its media propaganda stooges, under the control of the CIA dutifully filtering (pun intended) and spewingGeopolitics_Ukraine_F_Yulia.Tymoshenko_2 distorted information to its gullible smartphones hypnotized, sodomized, drugged up, decadent and morally lawless western zombie citizens, as a “return to democracy” (sic). Finally, on Mai the 25th of 2014, Ukrainian corrupt chocolate magnate and oligarch Petro Oleksiyovych Poroshenko was “elected” President of the Ukraine! But it is all the fault of Russian “war mongering” Vladimir Putin right?

Orange Revolution 2.0

Geopolitics_Ukraine_Nuland-PyattMemorable U.S. Assistant Secretary of State to Secretary of State John Kerry Victoria Nuland is your typical American bubblegum-chewing mafia doll! Some sort of a neo-colonialist reincarnated neo-con cow-girl riding high the tsunami waves of U.S. and NATO’s Eurasian expansion! In a public speech, our Washington’s cloned female warmonger made the following fascist hypocritical and propagandist NATO statement: “Since the declaration of Ukrainian independence in 1991, the United States supported the Ukrainians in the development of democratic institutions and skills in promoting civil society and a good form of government – all that is necessary to achieve the objectives of Ukraine’s European. We have invested more than 5 billion dollars to help Ukraine to achieve these and other goals. ” Victoria Nuland added: “The United States will continue to promote Ukraine to the future it deserves.”

Neo-Nazi Svoboda’s reelected leader: Oleh Tyahnybok

Clipboard_Image 107In his article: “There are No Neo-Nazis in Ukraine. And the Obama Administration does not support Fascists,” Prof Michel Chossudovsky’s writes: Svoboda is a Neo-Nazi Party, Ukraine’s fourth biggest party holding 36 seats out of 450 in parliament. They’re also part of the Alliance of European National Movements along with the BNP and Jobbik. Svoboda is supported directly by WashingtonThis is Svoboda and the “Right Sector”: the Neo-Nazi group which led the “protest movement” in Ukraine. These Neo-Nazis are armed gunmen.”

Just in case you missed it, here is Princess Nuland’s encore: An oratorio of suave vocabulary finesse and rhetorical skills caught in a “Nulandgate-style” statement she made during a phone conversation with U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Jeffrey Pyatt (02:32):

  • Nuland: “OK… one more wrinkle for you Geoff. I can’t remember if I told you this, or if I only told Washington this, that when I talked to Jeff Feltman [United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs] this morning, he had a new name for the UN guy Robert Serry did I write you that this morning?”
  • Pyatt: “Yeah I saw that.”
  • Nuland: “OK. He’s now gotten both [Robert] Serry and [UN Secretary General] Ban Ki-moon to agree that [Robert] Serry could come in Monday or Tuesday. So that would be great, I think, to help glue this thing and to have the UN help glue it and, you know, f**k the EU (02:32).

“Meet the new (cold) war,” wrote Pepe Escobar in his editorial: The New US-Russia Cold War:  ”. . . Same as the old (cold) war. Same, but different. One day, it’s the myriad implications of Washington’s ‘pivoting’ to Asia – as in the containment of China. The next day, it’s the perennial attempt to box Russia in. Never a dull moment in the New Great Game in Eurasia.” Escobar thinks that “’F**k the EU’ is essentially directed towards Berlin and Klitschko, its key protégé. Washington sees this going nowhere, as Germany, after all, has been slowly building a complex energy-investment partnership with Russia.”

Private Blackwater/Academi mercenaries to the Neo Nazi U.S. rescue

An alleged report by Jeremy Scahill (Investigating journalist and author of Blackwater) revealed that the largest mercenary army in the world, Blackwater (later called Xe Services and more recently “Academi”) clandestine intelligence services was sold to the multinational Monsanto. Blackwater was renamed in 2009 after becoming famous in the world with numerous reports of abuses in Iraq, including massacres of civilians. It remains the largest private contractor of the U.S. Department of State “security services,” that practices state terrorism by giving the government the opportunity to deny it.

Clipboard_Image 014About 400 elite mercenaries from the notorious US private security firm Academi (formerly Blackwater) were taking part in the Ukrainian military operation against anti-government protesters in southeastern regions of the country, German media reported. Der Bild am Sonntag (The Photo on Sunday) newspaper, citing a source in intelligence circles, wrote that Academi employees were involved in the Kiev military crackdown on pro-autonomy activists in the  Donetsk region. German Intelligence Service (BND: Bundesnachrichtendienst)  informed Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government about the mercenaries’ participation in the operation, the paper said, RIA Novosti reported.

Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet during a telephone conversation with Catherine Ashton Foreign Affairs and Security Policy discuss Ukraine over the phone and Umas Paet reporting the snipers shooting on both sides policemen and people on the street. Again this is strong evidence of the internal meddling by the United States, European Union and NATO into the sovereign affairs of the Ukraine.

2014 March the 10th:  A 33 tons U.S. gold heist

http://iskra-news.info/news/segodnja_nochju_iz_borispolja_v_ssha_strarto…

At 2 a.m. this morning an unmarked transport plane was on the runway at Borispol Airport. According to airport staff, before the plane came to the airport, four trucks and two Volkswagen minibuses arrived, all the truck license plates missing. Fifteen people in black uniforms, masks, and body armor stepped out, some armed with machine guns. They loaded the plane with more than 40 heavy boxes. After that a mysterious men arrived and entered the plane. All loading was done in a hurry. The plane took off on an emergency basis. Those who saw this mysterious special operation immediately notified the airport officials, who told the callers not to meddle in other people’s affairs.  Later a returned call from a senior official of the former Ministry of Income and Fees reported that tonight, on the orders of one of the new leaders of Ukraine, the United States had taken custody of all the gold reserves in Ukraine.

But as Chris Powell, Secretary and Treasurer of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc. writes:

“The first rule of mainstream financial journalism and particularly financial journalism about gold is never to put a specific critical question about the monetary metal to any of the primary participants in the gold market, central banks. That is, nearly all gold market reporting is, by design, irrelevant distraction at best, disinformation at worst.”

 “The true location and disposition of national gold reserves are secrets far more sensitive than the location and disposition of nuclear weapons.”

Maybe the gold looted by the U.S. will reimburse some of the costs neocon Victoria Nuland and her Ukrainian stooges have made in the first place! A western coup d’état that is aimed at separating Europe but particularly Germany from its main eastern trade partner Russia but also indirectly China.

Bruno P. Gebarski

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Academi, Blackwater, Color Revolution, Coup d'état, Jeffrey Pyatt, Orange Revolution, Russia, Ukraine, USA, Victoria Nuland, Vladimir Putin

Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror Management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part Three)

We are being told by (German) Main Stream Media that Migrants are warmly accepted by the Germans (obviously things changed after the violence that took place on New Year’s Eve in Cologne, Düsseldorf and Hamburg). But is it or was it really so? Boatloads of “refugees” are originating from Northern Africa’s U.S. war-torn zones such as Libya, Tunisia, Syria, Iraq and Eurasian Afghanistan.

This kind of mass migration acceptance would not be possible without the support (propaganda) of the German Main Stream Media as Udo Ulfkotte showed in his book “Gekaufte Journalisten – Bought Journalists”.  Interesting to notice that a survey results presented to the Germans: “Welcome Refugees to Germany“ never mentioned that

Clipboard_Image 050

Source: quer-denken.tv

19,2% of the tweets originated from the UK, 17% from the U.S. and 5% from Australia! How on earth can the UK, U.S. and Australia represent the veracity of the German‘s reaction and perception to the Migrant crisis when only 6,4% of the tweets originated from Germany?

We now know that 75%-80% of the migrants are healthy and vibrant young men being purposely sent to Germany and Austria! They arrive by boat mostly financed by the U.S.: do watch this excellent video breaking down what is happening between Libya and Europe. The „choice“ of „refugees“ moved to Germany/Austria must be carefully „chosen“ as the bulk of them are „healthy and full of vitality“ as we were able to witness in „New Year‘s Eve attacks on women“ in the second and fourth largest German cities of Hamburg and Cologne (Köln).

This „migration scheme“ seems well organized.  Austrian authorities know that “paperless migrants“ arrive without phones but are given a smartphone after going through “local authority procedures.”  It’s impossible to acquire a mobile phone in Austria or Germany without showing personal identification, a residential address and a bank account: “it’s for security reason” we have been told! So how can unregistered migrants be given smartphones?  Who is giving it to them including A1 Austrian Network SIM-cards? Who is footing the bill? Could it be the owner of Austrian A1, Carlos Slim the Mexican billionaire and second richest man in the world?

With smart phones not only can migrants call families back home, which is very understandable, of course, but also instantly organize flash mobs – or other joint activities that do not correspond to the practices of the local population!” Think New Year’s Eve (terrorist) attacks on women in Cologne and Hamburg.  Things are rarely given for free unless Return on Investment (ROI) is to be expected. So, what sort of ROI are we here talking about? Is the Establishment trying to create social tension within Germany and Austria’s while weakening the economic heartland of Europe?

Germany’s federal states are planning to spend around EUR 17 billion ($18.7 billion) on dealing with the refugee crisis in 2016, the newspaper Die Welt said on Tuesday, citing a survey it conducted among their finance ministries. The sum, bigger than the EUR 15.3 billion that the central government planned to allocate to its education and research ministry in 2015, is a measure of the strain that the influx is causing across the country as a whole.“

In 2015, the German government is going to spend more money on its Migrant crisis than on its education! Have the Germans been democratically asked about This? No! They have not. Dr. Prof. Michael Vogt from Quer-Denken TV is suggesting that the Migrant crisis is specifically targeted to Germany and Austria: Europe’s two strongest economies. The destructive results of mass migration will be felt on both sides for a long time to come. While Migrants will never feel home, Germans are being robbed of their homeland identity.

Dr. Thomas P. M. Barnett‘s bizarre geopolitical views could give the creeps to any sound minded individual listening to his material. Probably a derailed geostrategic genius! One of his strategies for Europe (to remain a U.S. vassal) could be very enhanced and accelerated by long term „Mingling of races“ – a targeted strategy of the New World Order.”

„In his books ‘The Pentagon’s New Map‘ – meaning so to speak – the US-Defense-Ministry’s new version of the world map and ‘Blueprint for ActionDr. Thomas P. M. Barnett turns out to be a cynical supporter of globalization. He claims that the final goal of globalization is ‘the synchronization of all the countries on earth‘. To be achieved, as he says, through a ‘mingling of the races.'” “According to Barnett, In Europe a light-brown race would emerge this way with an average intelligence quotient of 90 – ideal working slaves. Barnett warns in his books against ‘irrational people who will fight against this mingling of races’. He continues in a threatening tone, pointing out that he certainly takes notice of the irrational arguments of their opponents. However if they should put up any resistance against the global world order – he demands ‘we should kill them.'”

So what could be the reasons for the Establishment to threaten Germany with this Weapon of Mass Migration? According Kelly M. Greenhill, Author of “Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy”, this type of asymmetrical warfare has been used more than fifty times in the second part of the 20th Century.

Clipboard_Image 053

So is Germany the recent victim of Weapons of Mass Migration? Is Angela Merkel, the German Kanzler(in) coerced by the U.S. (and her oath of allegiance) to accept this flood of migrants pouring in into Germany?  What is the geopolitical goal of this “organized” human tidal wave?  What are the possible reasons for Germany to be under U.S., Britain and  France’s geopolitical attack?

  1. The inner strength of the German (and Austrian) economies: the only two EU-candidates still resisting the destruction of the fascist Euro straitjacket and the EU’s financial looting?
  2. The renewed Nord Stream 2 pipeline Gazprom agreements between Germany and Russia from whom Germany imports 40% of its gas and 30% of its crude oil?
  3. A worse conceivable U.S. threat: Germany and Russia become allies again! The reason for a U.S. coup d’état in Ukraine and how the U.S. coerced Europe into imposing economic sanctions upon Russia?
  4. Angela Merkel’s CDU being reluctant to sign TTIP, the fascist, kleptocrat and oligarch U.S. agreement that would remove the little of what is left of our German/European sovereignty?
  5. Germany and France (François Hollande) turning their support towards Russia in their common fight against ISIS, the U.S. terror subsidiary led by the CIA?
  6. France and Germany creating a split within the Western Alliance of NATO by turning towards Russia in attacking ISIS?

The German leadership’s psychological game is evil, subtle and refined. It abuses its national shameful past: The WWII Jewish holocaust. This emotional shameful “weapon” is used by the government, institutions, medias and NGOs against its own people with the aim of marginalizing citizens expressing legitimate concerns about the migrants such as costs, violence (as exemplified during new year’s eve events in Cologne) and terrorism. They are automatically stamped as “intolerant”, “right extremist” or even “Nazi”: a feeling Germans do not want to be reminded of or associated with because of the difficult past of their national history.

Clipboard_Image 054

A final quote from Joschka Fischer former German Minister and Vice-Bundeskanzler

“The plundering of Germany; a raison d’état”

Germany is the problem, because the Germans are more diligent, disciplined and talented than the rest of Europe. This will always lead to inequalities. But it can be counter measured by moving as much money as possible outside of Germany. It does not matter for what it is, even if it is radically wasted – the main thing, the Germans do not have it and already the world is saved.” —Joseph Martin “Joschka” Fischer

Bruno P. Gebarski

Further Reading:

  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration | Libyan Gold | The Trail of a French Tale (Part 6)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Coercion and Weapons of Mass Migration: coming Full Circle (Part 5)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, and Weapons of Mass Migration, Forced Displacement and Eugenics (Part 4)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement and Coercion (Part 3)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, Al Qaeda and ISIS as secret U.S. CIA assets (Part 2)
  • Fifteen Years of Western NATO and U.S.-led “Terror management”, 911 and Afghanistan (Part 1)

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Angela Merkel, Corruption, Geopolitics, Germany, Middle East, Migrant, Refugees, Russia, Syria, USA